Accepting a Nuclear India
Image Credit: White House

Accepting a Nuclear India

0 Likes
48 comments

The international community is now looking at how best to bring India into multilateral nuclear export control regimes. During his November 2010 visit to India, US President Barack Obama delivered a number of speeches and issued a joint statement with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that contained some significant policy pronouncements, particularly over the accommodation of India in US and multilateral export control regimes.

Obama announced, for example, that the United States would support India’s candidature in the four multilateral export control regimes—the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), the Australia Group and the Wassenaar Arrangement. India meets all the criteria for membership of the MTCR, although it may have to add a few items to its dual use technology control list to meet the criteria for the Australia Group. But for membership in the strategically key NSG and Wassenaar Arrangement, there’s a significant sticking point in the form of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

After Obama’s announcement supporting India’s membership, France and Russia also offered their support, and the idea that India might be given membership incrementally gained some traction. It was generally believed that the Australia Group would come first, followed by the MTCR and the NSG and the Wassenaar Arrangement in that order. However, the Indian establishment wants membership to come as a package, a position broadly supported by the Indian strategic community. As this message has been sent out around the world, concerned global players have two options: either deny or accept India’s membership of all regimes.

And, with India’s economy performing well even during the global financial crisis (and with it being an equally important producer, client and consumer of advanced technology) other nations may well have no choice but to accommodate India. Indeed, the process of accommodation seems to have already begun. Analysts and non-governmental experts are being consulted over how India might best be included in the regimes, and although there’s so far little news on official interactions, the fact that the non-governmental community has been sounded out has prompted much speculation.

Unfortunately, the ongoing counter-arguments to accommodating India’s position were given voice in a short essay entitled ‘NSG Membership: A Criteria-based Approach for Non-NPT States,’ penned by Pierre Goldschmidt for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Although the essay maintains a semblance of objectivity, it sadly reflects the prejudice prevalent in parts of the US non-proliferation community. The very first paragraph, for example, opens with the cliché: ‘The nuclear policy community widely believes this (the 2008 NSG guidelines) exemption undermines the credibility of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime.’ But while some point to the China-Pakistan deal for building additional reactors at the Chashma complex as an example of what US accommodating of India has led to, even a novice in the field should know that Pakistan and China would have cut the deal irrespective of the India-specific exemptions. After all, the Pakistan-China deal was made on the basis of a grandfather clause of a previous unseen agreement, while it’s hard to believe that Pakistan's blocking of negotiations for the Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty at last year’s Conference on Disarmament wouldn’t have happened anyway.

Comments
48
Adam
January 19, 2013 at 20:16

we can't accept nuclear weapon in India. it will cause a precedent and definetely won't be good for total disarmament which should be a goal of international community

the great one
July 3, 2011 at 03:31

@ Frank u CCP keyboard warrior get some job. India have far more advance nuclear program than u toyland has . If u have fantasies about taking out Indian nukes Let me inform u that China does not have the capabilities . And there is no such thing as the chinese nuclear shield . The indian anti ballistic program is miles ahead of ur chinese.

Lumiere
June 21, 2011 at 15:06

India lied through its teeth to use Canadian Nuclear Technology for bomb building, and their signature on any sheet of paper is worthless, just like the promises they used to get the Canadian Technology.

Siddharth
June 13, 2011 at 19:54

India’s nuclear weapons are very advanced.
Moreover, India already has thermonuclear devices. Therefore, stop speaking the language of anti-India clique.

Frank
June 12, 2011 at 12:25

You are right.

Only permanent UN security council members can have nukes.

hk
June 12, 2011 at 06:40

When your Communist Party of China disarms its Nuclear weapons….India will do.

Pakistan is china’s Vassal and whole world knows about it.

Terex
June 12, 2011 at 04:25

China communist government is biggest proliferator of nuclear weapons to world.

India will become member of NSG and NPT by end of 2011.

Even china cant stop india…

hk
June 11, 2011 at 05:15

@John Chan June 10, 2011 at 4:38 am ….. let all the readers see here how biased you are towards your master Communist Party of China. Not that you don’t know the facts, but your job is to write half-truths to glorify The Communist Party of China. I hope that the administrator of this site will note this.

stop kissing up your Master CP of China and see the facts below:
(@John Chan…June 8, 2011 at 11:07 pm)

The Real facts are….

1. As signatory of NPT, China must not proliferate to other nations. China gave nuclear and missile technologies to North Korea and Pakistan. CHINA GIFTED WEAPONS GRADE URANIUM TO PAKISTAN.
SEE:– http://southasiantribune.com/china-gifted-50-kgs-of-weapon-grade-uranium-bomb-design-to-pakistan-in-the-’70s/

If you Google “CHINA GIFTED WEAPONS GRADE URANIUM TO PAKISTAN” …. you will find many more facts on sinister motives of the The Communist Party of China.

2. China is a ‘Dictatorship’…. nothing less than this. China must learn from their neighbors Taiwan and Japan on Democracy.

3. China does not do humanitarian help to any country. China only conducts business with poor nations(and Like-minded mineral/oil rich Dictatorships) making deals beneficial to China.
CHINA GIFTED WEAPONS GRADE URANIUM TO PAKISTAN. That is not for power supply.

4. India’s Nuclear Weapons are only as deterrent against China’s Nuclear weapons build-up and its nuclear weapons supply to its vassal Pakistan.

5. India is not signatory of NPT, but more responsible than The Communist Party of China. When China dismantles all its Nuclear Weapons, India too will.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
required
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment
required

Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief