Beijing Air Pollution Brouhaha
Image Credit: Flickr / Bell and Jeff

Beijing Air Pollution Brouhaha

0 Likes
5 comments

Smog recently forced the cancellation of almost 700 flights at Beijing airport, igniting a mini media firestorm. Since flights at Beijing’s airport have been canceled on any number of occasions over the past two decades because of pollution, why all the attention now?

Several reasons:

First, the flight cancellations have generally occurred in the spring as a result of the yellow dust storms that sweep across China’s northern plain. The city of Beijing has little ability to control these choking clouds of dust. This time, however, the pollution was all Beijing’s doing.

Second, the Beijing government is already under enormous popular pressure for its inability and/or unwillingness to tackle its air quality problems head on. Everyone in Beijing knows that on a daily basis the air quality ranges from fair to fairly awful. How else did it earn the distinction of being one of the world’s dirtiest capitals? But the local government simply refuses to acknowledge the reality of the problem. Thus, while it regularly reports blue sky days, the people in Beijing live in an almost perpetual state of gray.

But the real catalyst for the current contretemps is the U.S. Embassy. If Beijing citizens were once resigned to living in this alternative state of reality, then that’s no longer the case. The U.S. Embassy has changed the way the game is played. On a daily basis, the embassy tweets data reflecting the real air quality for the area in which the embassy resides. Last Sunday, for example, as NPR reported, the pollution recorded by the embassy hit a level described as “beyond index.” The Beijing Municipal Bureau of Environmental Protection, in contrast, reported the air pollution as “light.”

There are important differences in the pollutants on which Beijing reports (PM 10) and those on which the U.S. Embassy reports (PM 2.5 and Ozone) and how each rates air quality (the United States has much stricter standards for clean air). Environmental expert Steven Q. Andrews provides an excellent analysis comparing the two sets of measurements and standards. (Steven is a personal hero of mine having been the person who, a few years ago, uncovered the Chinese government’s habit of moving air pollution monitoring equipment to less heavily trafficked areas in order to improve the air quality ratings.)

Beijing has pledged to report on additional pollutants by 2016. Why 2016? My guess is that they are waiting for the 12th Five Year Plan to kick into gear in the vain hope that the government’s investment in alternative energies and alternative fuel vehicles will come to fruition and help them out.

I don’t think the people will wait that long. They know that the government has the capacity to measure and report on the additional statistics now. Real estate billionaire Pan Shiyi conducted an online poll and discovered that 91 percent of the more than 40,000 respondents believed that the government should monitor particle levels at the 2.5 micrometer level this year – people in Beijing care about their health and the health of their children. According to a deputy director of the Beijing Health Bureau, the lung cancer rate in Beijing over the past decade has increased by 60 percent, even though the rate of smoking hasn’t increased.

It doesn’t help the Beijing public to know that their own leaders have air purifiers in their offices and other government buildings.

Even as Beijing struggles to address the popular discontent with the city’s air pollution, it appears to be trying to get ahead of the curve on water issues. The Global Times announced that people in Beijing will be able to access daily an online system to check their water quality. Of course, they will be receiving information not about the water they drink, but rather about the quality of the water at the pumping station. As the article also notes, what happens as the water travels through “broken pipes” and “aging storage tanks” is anybody’s guess.

Elizabeth C. Economy is C.V. Starr Senior Fellow and Director for Asia Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. She is an expert on Chinese domestic and foreign policy and U.S.-China relations and author of the award-winning book, 'The River Runs Black: The Environmental Challenge to China's Future.' She blogs at Asia Unbound, where this piece originally appeared.

Comments
5
Grant
December 14, 2011 at 03:54

There is still the underlying problem of energy need, the fuel used, low and poorly enforced standards. You can monitor all you like and it won’t change the facts.

Grant
December 14, 2011 at 03:51

While it would obviously be difficult for Beijing’s government to inspect every single home, it could provide home measurement devices at discount prices and demand that buildings built after 2015 (giving companies three years to make what should be a simple change) have devices installed at sinks.

gregw
December 9, 2011 at 23:10

What!!!!China is NOT DEVELOPED to such a HIGH …..u know know the rest. OK hhyap, then, how on earth can a country NOT as DEVELOPED send people into space, plan on building its own space station, have WMD, host a world EXPO and Olympic games(both done very well too I may add)…….China is the world’s number ONE copier, so why OH WHY don’t they, they being the CCP governments at ALL LEVELS force ALL companies Chinese or Overseas owned to start using NON-POLLUTING methods to supply the required power needed? The EVIL WEST can do it, why not China.
OH, by the way, the provincial governments of New Zealand and Australia can measure the water quality at someones home address……all U have to do is ASK them to do it…and they will and CAN.

hhyap
December 9, 2011 at 13:31

There are things ordinary people can hope for, such as power, air and food.
China is not developed to such a high standard as the developed nations.
It could only afford to bring sufficient electricity with coal power and this pollute immensely. You gain a status in such a quick way in the power generation but there is a weakness in pollution from such facilities.
Next is for the Chinese to reduce the polluting chimneys…one way would be to feed cleaner coal into burning furnaces.

As to water cleanliness measurement, no government can have the capacity to test the water at each household. Why the hypocritical comment?

shen liang
December 9, 2011 at 03:37

Ah, delays and cancelations in Beijing

We could make the biggest airport in the world, but we couldn’t enlarge the sky.
We could change the weather, but we couldn’t change the murk.
Such is the quality of government planning.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
required
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment
required

Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief