Economy Key to Burma's Democracy
Image Credit: Flickr / Magical World

Economy Key to Burma's Democracy

0 Likes
4 comments

Nearly a year since his government took office in Burma last March, President Thein Sein’s program of political reforms continues to surprise and win over critics. In January alone, the government concluded a ceasefire with the Karen National Union, one of the country’s main ethnic insurgent groups, released a second batch of political prisoners, and agreed to the full normalization of relations with the United States. In a press conference in Bangkok ahead of his visit to Burma, U.S. Senator John McCain even let slip the regime’s preferred “Myanmar” rather than “Burma” – a subtle signal of just how far things have shifted.

Amid the optimism about this “Burmese Spring,” investors have turned their eyes towards the potential of the Burmese economy – Southeast Asia’s slumbering giant. As others in these pages have noted, interest is gathering in this untapped market of 50 million, stunted for decades by colossal mismanagement and Soviet-style central planning. Recent visits by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and British Foreign Secretary William Hague have raised the prospect that economic sanctions banning Western trade with Burma will soon be scaled back or removed. In the meantime, Asian investors are already making moves into the market, and a Japanese business delegation led by Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Yukio Edano traveled to the country this month.

The country offers massive potential in just about every imaginable sector, from banking, telecommunications, and power generation to agriculture, natural resources, and construction. Douglas Clayton, founder and CEO of Leopard Capital, which operates in emerging markets, wrote recently that “an epic economic catch up marathon seems set to start, and could morph into a sprint if Burma creates the right investment framework.”

Of course, there’s still a long way to go before that framework is firmly in place. As many have pointed out, the country still lacks the foreign investment rules and predictable governing apparatus necessary to attract investors. The banking system is in disarray – most of the country’s overwhelmingly rural population lacks any access to credit – and the local currency, the kyat, is still set artificially at a value more than a hundred times higher than that available on the black market. Import restrictions mean that buying a car – even a battered 1980s Toyota – can still cost tens of thousands of dollars.

Ultimately, however, the health of the Burmese economy should be of interest not just to investors and economists; it could also have a crucial bearing on the country’s political reforms and the long-term sustainability of the “Burmese Spring.” Historically, economic hardship and political unrest have been closely linked in Burma: in September 1987, the government’s decision to demonetize 25-, 35- and 75-kyat notes wiped out the savings of thousands, providing ready kindling for the following year’s seismic anti-government protests. The “Saffron Revolution” of 2007 was similarly sparked, at least in part, by hikes in the price of gas and diesel fuel.

Assuming the government can negotiate the thickets of currency reform and other basic structural changes, the longer-term economic challenges are thorny. Much of the country’s economic dysfunction is a result of the massive fiscal distortions created by the Burmese military, an institutional behemoth that consumes just under a quarter of the national budget, according to official figures. David Scott Mathieson, a Burma researcher for Human Rights Watch, says that while the current political changes have so far been more or less frictionless, few people are willing to discuss this “ultimate reform.”

Military personnel, according to some, are still embedded throughout the country’s governing apparatus.“In the most fundamental way, the state bureaucracy has been thoroughly militarized, that is, run by military officers and ex-officers,” says Maung Zarni, a visiting fellow in the Department of International Development at the London School of Economics. “Honest, capable technocrats and bureaucrats don’t survive in this militarized system of governance.”

Decadesof military rule also mean there are relatively few officials with the necessary education and experience to manage such a complex transition. “It’s a mindset problem. These are people who are used to taking orders, used to being part of a command economy,” Turnell says.

Comments
4
March 24, 2013 at 23:40

[...] the old regime lose such elections, thus ushering in a new democratic era. At the moment, the the transition in Burma is unfolding according to this [...]

[...] the old regime lose such elections, thus ushering in a new democratic era. At the moment, the transition in Burma is unfolding according to this [...]

Richard
April 2, 2012 at 15:14

-The world major economic powers are in/heading for economic troubles:
(1)USA
(2)EU
(3)China
(4)Japan
I agree it is possible that some of them might collapse.

-Murderous Senior General Than Shwe and many of his Generals do not care about their own country,they care about their powers and pockets.

-Some business elite care for society,some do not.

-The Burmese people should get the basic freedom in accordance with UN declarations of human rights

Proposed road Map for General Thein Sein an Aung San Suu Kyi:
(1)End the civil war
(2)Create a multi-ethnic state
(3)Invite investment — but with protections
(4)Cut the bloated military budget
(5)Tackle Burma’s drugs problem
(6)Unleash grassroots entrepreneurship
(7)Support press freedom

The Burmese people need the blessings of God.

Toby
January 31, 2012 at 03:14

I am concerned people will miss the opportunity for democracy if they follow Western economic reforms. The Western economies are corrupt and on the verge of collapse.

Myanmar must avoid a debt-based money system, because it will eventually hobble their development take from them their sovereignty. At least (in my opinion anyway) Than Shwe and his posse cared for the country — if only the Burmans. The business elite care nothing for society; their model prohibits such feelings.

It is great to see the Burmese people get some freedom, but the state of the world economies is such that one’s joy must be tempered with concern that the Burmese are going to replace dictators in khakis with dictators in suits. There is no bright example for them to follow in the world, and it does not appear they are in the mood to forge their own path any longer.

One of their first new laws should be the death penalty for the paedophiles who are surely on their way.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
required
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment
required

Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief