Opening Pandora's Box: If Israel Strikes Iran, What About Hezbollah?
Image Credit: Wikicommons

Opening Pandora's Box: If Israel Strikes Iran, What About Hezbollah?

0 Likes
13 comments

As the day approaches when Israel may decide to launch a preemptive strike against Iran in order to cripple its nuclear infrastructure, Israeli policymakers and their allies abroad would carefully assess how the Lebanese-based group Hezbollah would react.

Although Israel is unlikely to launch an attack on Iran prior to the U.S. Presidential election in November, the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is said to be running out of patience and is becoming more vocal in warning that Iran’s nuclear program could cross Israel’s so-called “red line” by next spring or summer at the latest. Other factors, including the outcome of the U.S. elections, the outcome of the P5+1- Iran talks that are expected to follow the U.S. Presidential Election, growing instability in neighboring Syria, and the outcome of the early elections that Netanyahu has just called, will all factor into Israel’s decision on whether to use force against Tehran, and if so, when.

But perhaps no single factor, besides Iran’s nuclear program itself, will be as important in influencing Israel’s strategic assessment as the realization that attacking Iran risks sparking a war on several fronts; that is, one that not only invites retaliation from Iran, but very likely from its regional ally and sometimes proxy, Hezbollah. With the debacle of the 2006 war against the Lebanese group still fresh in Israeli minds, the possibility that the Shi’a organization would renew hostilities against the Jewish state through cross-border raids, terrorism, or rocket attacks against its cities, will have to be part of Israel’s calculations for any “day after” scenario.

Besides helping create the “Party of God” on the anvil of the Lebanese civil war and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) invasion of Southern Lebanon in 1982, Iran’s support for Hezbollah has become multifaceted over the years, and now includes: military training, arms transfers, intelligence and, perhaps most crucially, financial support. Although a fair share of the funding provided by Tehran has gone towards building schools and hospitals, as well as the provision of social services in poor Shi’ite neighborhoods in Lebanon, the aid has also helped the organization’s militant wing. Moreover, Hezbollah fighters are known to have received extensive training from, and to be working closely with, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). While Hezbollah is now a political party competing in elections and an important social force in long-neglected parts of Lebanon, and while it has for the most part ceased serving as an extension of the Islamic Republic, its armed wing’s ability to inflict pain on Israel remains a powerful bargaining chip, if not an adequate deterrent against an Israeli attack on Iran. As journalist Nicholas Blanford wrote in a recent book on the organization: “the billions of dollars Iran has spent on Hezbollah since 2000 was not an altruistic gift to help Lebanon defend itself against the possibility of future Israeli aggression … through Hezbollah, Iran has established a bridgehead on Israel’s northern border, enhancing its deterrence posture and expanding its retaliatory options in the event of an attack on the Islamic Republic.”

Indeed, Hezbollah packs a formidable punch. According to IDF Deputy Chief of Staff Yair Naveh, Hezbollah today has at least 60,000 rockets and missiles in its arsenal, or about ten times the number it had during the 34-day war in 2006. While the organization had few rockets that were capable of hitting Tel Aviv during that conflict, today it is said to have several thousands in its arsenal capable of doing so. In addition to the short- and medium-range rockets, Western intelligence assesses that Hezbollah has acquired a Syrian version of the Iranian Fateh-110 surface-to-surface missile, with a range of 200-300km, and may have received Russian-made SA-8 tactical air-defense systems. Hezbollah is also suspected of possessing a number of Chinese systems that were reverse-engineered by Iran or Syria, including the Raad anti-ship missile, the Misagh-2 MANPAD, and the B302 rocket, a Syrian version of the Chinese WS-1 multiple-launch rocket system (MLRS). Other rockets in Hezbollah’s arsenal include the Iranian Fajr-3 (42km), Fajr-5 (~70km), and the Zalzel I/II(125/210km). In recent years, Hezbollah has placed medium- and long-range rockets deeper inside Lebanon and further away from the border with Israel. According to Daniel Byman of the Brookings Institution, many of those are concealed in homes. Such an arsenal, added to geographical proximity, has led some Israeli security officials to argue that an attack by Hezbollah would be more dangerous than Iranian retaliation following a preemptive strike against Tehran’s nuclear facilities.

Comments
13

[...] 5. J. Michael Cole at the Diplomat considers Hezbollah and the ramifications of an Israeli strike on Iran. [...]

Kanes
October 19, 2012 at 11:25

I agree.
At some point Russia will threaten to get involved unless the parties (USA, Israel and Iran) come to a broad agreement to stop the war. If USA attacks Iran, Russia will take the opportunity to bomb the missile defense shield and possibly certain pestering targets in the Middle East too. USA and Russia will never go to war. They will have a deal to end the crisis. As part of the deal, Russia will want the creation of Palestine (Russia's Israel equal).
Israel's "collective punishment" strategies in Lebanon will only make their resolve stronger and justify a Russian response.

Kanes
October 19, 2012 at 11:14

Iranian nuclear sites include nuclear power plants. Attacking nuclear power plants is a war crime. If that happens, there is nothing that stops Iran or a terror group attacking Dimona nuclear power plant with catastrophic results. The possibility of using chemical and nuclear weapons by these parties cannot be ruled out either.
Israel would prefer a short stint while Iran and terror groups will want a long drawn out war.
If it turns to attrition war, the winner cannot be Israel. Demographic imbalance in favor of Palestinians will have an immediate and massive implication. To save face, both Ahamadinajad and Kameni will want to use their everything and that certainly includes a large stock of chemical weapons.
Hopefully they can sort this out without bloodshed.

Ricardo
October 17, 2012 at 10:33

In other words, anything could happen. As the US found out in Iraq, starting a war is very different to knowing how to end it. The only certainty is that launching an attack on Iran would pour more oil onto an already volatile situation.

BH1
October 15, 2012 at 20:15

Israeli attack on Iran will not happen, at least not directly as preemptive strike. US cannot promise protection to Israel these days since the position of US in middle east is quite delicate. Even a small mistake will cost US and Europe a lot of money for fighting a terrorists in the next ten years. What I am saying is that there are more important issues for the allies than attacking Iran.

bobo
October 15, 2012 at 15:34

Long live the Hez !

Bankotsu
October 15, 2012 at 11:34

"Iran and Hezbollah will use chaos in Syria to their advantage, as they have already by trying to draw the West in."
Iran is trying to keep the west out of Syria, they don't want the west or Israel in Syria.
Iran urges West to stay out of Syria's ‘internal matters'
http://www.sundayszaman.com/sunday/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=253968
 

Bob Boughner
October 15, 2012 at 05:27

You do realise that Bloomfield's book is a novel (i.e. fiction), right? I hope you're not taking it seriously…

Mark Thomason
October 15, 2012 at 05:08

Hezbollah has always been Lebanon-centric.  It was created in Lebanon from Lebanese to get the Israelis to end their 20 year occupation of Lebanon.  It is made up of Lebanese part timers, very like the Israeli reserve forces.
Israeli propaganda linked it to Iran to a far greater degree than was ever warranted, for the purposes of Israeli propaganda.  

Brad
October 15, 2012 at 02:28

Fantastic article.  I think the most likely response to a strike on Iran would be a lot of limpet mines stuck to Israeli and possible U.S diplomatic vehicles and such, not a direct attack by Hezbollah.  Iran would attack directly though unless the U.S is involved in the strike, in which case the probably would not have the capacity to retaliate (one overflight of just 19 of our B-2's would yield over 800 five hundred pound bombs, not to mention B-1's, subs, and everything else).
 
Iran and Hezbollah will use chaos in Syria to their advantage, as they have already by trying to draw the West in.  One or two errant shells is understandable, but trading direct fire and bringing 3 shells down on the same house is purposeful and everyone knows it.

Bankotsu
October 14, 2012 at 23:08

If Israel instigates war against Iran, then maybe the final liberation of Palestine will be at hand.
 
 

Prof. Taheri
October 13, 2012 at 01:55

The details of an Israeli attack on Iran are revealed in Jonathan Bloomfield’s award-winning book, “Palestine.”

Torch Pratt
October 13, 2012 at 00:00

Wonderful writing! Excellent research! The middle east is such a ballet of chaos and entropy. 

Share your thoughts

Your Name
required
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment
required

Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief