By Yogesh Joshi

But most importantly, the pessimist picture suffers from a selective marshaling of evidence. For example, the issue of liability notwithstanding, the interests of American nuclear firms are being advanced by the Indian government over other foreign suppliers. In fact, just before President Bush signed the Indo-U.S. civilian nuclear agreement into law, India promised to exclusively reserve approximately 10,000 MW of the nuclear reactor market for U.S. vendors. No such promises were made to other advanced nuclear technology powers. Similarly, by early 2009, two prominent locations in the industry friendly states of Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh had been reserved for the American companies Westinghouse and General Electric. As Saurav Jha rightly argues, India has only offered two dedicated locations for reactor development to American firms. Furthermore, earlier this year, U.S.-based Westinghouse and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited signed an “Early Works Agreement” for setting up five nuclear reactors at Mithivadi in the state of Gujarat.

India’s nuclear liability law does indeed create an obstacle for U.S. firms. But it is more a result of India’s democratic processes and also, to a large extent, the changed perceptions of nuclear energy after the Fukushima crisis. In fact, when the law was initially proposed, the Indian government categorically rejected any liability claims against nuclear technology suppliers. However, the memories of the Bhopal Gas tragedy and the legitimacy crisis which unfolded after Fukushima would bind the hands of the Indian government. In any case, under Indian law the supplier’s liability is limited in both the dollar amount that can be incurred — U.S.$91 million — and the time frame companies can be held liable for. Moreover, given the sheer size of India’s nuclear energy market, any amount incurred from one plant is almost certainly to be made up for by the profits made on other plants. This is especially true given the stricter safety standards of modern generations of nuclear reactors. Indeed, it’s telling that as American companies balk at the nuclear liability law, other advanced nuclear exporters like France are eagerly entering India’s nuclear market.  

Additionally, whatever economic benefits the U.S. hasn’t obtained from India’s nuclear industry pale in comparison to the enormous profits U.S. defense companies have reaped from sales to India.  Despite India’s reservations about becoming too dependent on American military hardware, over the last seven years U.S. defense corporations have received more than U.S. $8 billion worth of contracts from India, increasingly displacing Russia as India’s preferred military supplier. This is occurring despite the enormous stipulations Washington places on arms contracts and the difficulty recipient nations often have in securing spare parts for their purchases over the entire course of the contract. 

Strategically India and the U.S. have become extremely close. More than fifty joint defense exercises have taken place in the last seven years. Since 2005, India has supported all IAEA sanctions against Iran including those which reported it to the UN Security Council. India’s dependence on Iranian oil has also been reduced drastically, a fact that Hillary Clinton herself attested to recently.

View as Single Page

ARTICLE TAGS

    , , , , , ,

COMMENTS

35 LEAVE A COMMENT
    1. luvs

      obama came to india to make a business deal which would create 50,000 jobs in america while giving free aids to pakistan ….now i have two questions
      1 who needs whom?
      2 trust america?

      Reply
      • Anjaan

        @ luvs,
        I love you …. that is all I can say ………. !!!

        Reply
        • luvs

          i can understand …..

          Reply
    2. luvs

       

      @ MEGAKIDS - KNOW ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY THEN COMMENT ON OTHERS
      Every 45 seconds someone in the United States is sexually assaulted (1).
      1 out of every 6 women currently in college has been raped (2), however, 9 out of 10 women raped on campus never tell anyone about the rape (3).
      1 in 10 men is raped in his lifetime (4), 1 in 7 of those victims will have been assaulted before the age of 18.
      More than 61.5% of rapes are never reported to law enforcement (5).
      Approximately 35% of rape is committed by an acquaintance, and 17% by a relative other than spouse (6).
      74% of sexual assaults are perpetrated by assailants well known to the victim (7).
      A female child victim is 7 times more likely to be re-victimized as an adult (8).
      Nearly 6 out of 10 sexual assaults occur at the victim’s home or the home of a friend, relative, or neighbor (9).
      1 in 15 rape victims contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD) as a result of being raped (10).
       
      The United States has the world’s highest rape rate of all countries that publish such data- 13 times higher than England and more than 20 times higher than Japan (12).
      An American woman is 10 times more likely to be raped than to die in a car crash (13).
      61% of rape victims are females under the age of 18 (14).
      Contrary to common belief that violent crime rates are notably lower in rural areas, a recent analysis of location data collected for the 1999 National Women’s Study found that 10.1% of women living in rural areas had experienced a completed rape as compared to 13.6% of women living in urban and suburban communities—hardly a notably lower rate.

      Lewis, S. 2003. Unspoken Crimes: Sexual Assault in Rural America, Enola, PA: National Sexual Violence Resource Center
      References:
      U.S. Department of Justice, 1994 
      Statistics on Sexual Violence Against Women, 1990; Woodruff & Koss 
      Rape Treatment Center of Santa Monica Longitudinal Study, 1995 
      Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence, 2002 & The American Medical Association, 2000 
      Indiana Coalition Against Sexual Assault, 2002 
      U.S. Department of Justice, 1994 
      U.S. Department of Justice, 1994 
      Indiana Coalition Against Sexual Assault, 2002 
      National Crime Victimization Survey, 1996 
      Statistics on Sexual Violence Against Women: A Criminological Study, 1990 
      Ibid. #10 Senate Judiciary Committee, 1990 
      Ibid. #12 American Medical Association, 2000

      Reply
      • Davos

        Luvs, How do you presume that Megakids is from the US???? Your presumptions and attitude is yet another example of why India is where it is. When ever any criticism is directed at India, most Indians jump up and down defending India with irrelevant facts and not accepting any constructive criticism, instead of focusing on how to making real change.
        Although I don't agree with all Megakids comments (he seems to have a lack of understanding of India's history for starters), he is correct in stating that India's historical stature, will not be enough to be a truly relevant power in the coming years.

        Reply
      • a.p.

        Nationalism is a very bad thing. Crimes are the consequence of all the advanced countries and liberty, obviously if you are in a totalitarian state or in Iran you have not that data or you don't even know about them…. A person not from US

        Reply
    3. Christian

      The US and India are meant for each other. Both Americans and Indians have a penchant for killing.
      Americans kill defenseless children and teachers with guns. Indians rape and kill defenseless women.
      These are the two greatest nations of the twenty-first century!

      Reply
      • Bankotsu

        I rather India join China and Russia to create multipolar world rather than gang up with U.S to contain China.
        If India fights China, there won't be a multipolar world and the U.S will win.

        Reply
      • started-me-thinking

        Abu Ghraib seems pretty much forgotten today being no longer in the daily news. But AB was a microcosm of what's wrong (or right) with these two countries. As for one of them, rapes and murders though horrible pale in comparison to the numerous acid attacks against defenceless people. Such acts are totally and revulsively inhuman.

        Reply
        • Anjaan

          @ started-me-thinking,
          Have you noted the difference ……. ?
          1. One is horrific criminal act …… by individuals, where there is no public or state support …. as in case of US school shooting, or the cases of Indian rape and murder.
          2.  The other is equally horrific criminal act ….. this time committed by the State, with full public support, against another state and its people ….. there are numerous examples ………the US in Vietnam, Combodia, Iraq …. and  Pakistan in Afghanistan, Mumbai and Kashmir are the prime examples …….

          Reply

LEAVE A COMMENT

LEAVE A COMMENT