India's Battle for Freedom in Cyberspace
Image Credit: Wikicommons

India's Battle for Freedom in Cyberspace


India’s online community has been buzzing since the arrest of two young women by the Mumbai police last month for posting comments on Facebook criticizing the city’s shutdown following the death of veteran Shiv Sena leader, Bal Thackeray. The arrests of Shaheen Dhada and Renu Srinivasan sparked public outrage across the country, and drew criticism from civil society, media, and the government. Telecom Minister Kabil Sibal described the arrests as “unfortunate,” and renowned Indian personalities, such as author Shobha De, anti-corruption activist turned politician, Arvind Kejriwal, and others, expressed their dismay on Twitter. Faced with mounting public ire, the Mumbai police eventually suspended the officers who made the arrests and dropped the case against Dhada and Srinivasan. The arrests triggered a vigorous public debate that rages today about the right to freedom of speech and expression, and the extent to which the government can or should regulate the internet.

India is the fastest growing internet market among the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nations, according to a recent study by Assocham and ComScore, expanding annually at the rate of 41 percent, with approximately 125 million internet users currently. Nearly 75 percent of these users are between the ages of 15 and 34, making India’s online community one of the youngest in the world. While internet penetration is still low (less than 10 percent of the population), social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter are becoming increasingly popular as mobile phone penetration deepens across the country. From a small user base of 8 million in 2010, Facebook today has 50 million subscribers in India, with the number growing each day. Indians are generating a growing volume of user content as they like, post, tag, tweet, and blog online. Some of this content has the Indian government worried.

As I wrote in an earlier post to In Asia, India’s government has dramatically increased its oversight and surveillance of the internet and social media platforms over the last two years. In April 2011, it adopted a new set of IT rules requiring websites and service providers to respond to netizen requests to remove content deemed “blasphemous,” “disparaging,” or “hateful” within 36 hours of the complaint being filed. Later in the year, the government filed cases against 21 companies, including internet giants like Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, and Google, demanding the removal of objectionable and inflammatory material and the “pre-screening” of user content. According to Google’s latest Transparency Report, between January and June 2012, Indian authorities also sought web user details in as many as 2,319 cases and requested the removal of 596 items from various internet platforms, a more than 100% jump over the previous six months. The items related primarily to issues of privacy and security (374), defamation (120), and religious offences (75).

construction machineryrajkot
June 7, 2013 at 15:24

I don’t even know the way I ended up here, but I assumed this submit was once good. I do not recognise who you’re but definitely you are going to a famous blogger when you are not already. Cheers!

Alpha roger
March 16, 2013 at 21:33

Unbridled celebration is a hallmark of Indian spirit. They celebrate even the untested and untried ‘freedom of expression’ and give its opponents a run for its money. And yet from this chaos India might be the first country to develop a cyber jurisprudence that that guides global conduct of cyberspace. 10 years ago computer laws occupied one page of text books in networking classes.

Bindas Bolre
December 13, 2012 at 11:19

Irrational incidents  like this happen everywhere. What matters is how it is rectified. I dont need to quote examples of how the law enforcement agents in USA beating up homeless guys and women. 
In this the policemen who arrested those two girls were suspended from their positions and the magistrate transferred for not issuing bail instead of dismissing the case. This incident has also enabled the government to reexamine its cyber laws which were passed in 2001 when internet was in infancy in India

Dr. Rice
December 11, 2012 at 05:09

Are you suggesting that people pay me to be a yankee pig? I wish. Secondly, what are you blathering about?

Indebted To Paymaster
December 9, 2012 at 19:31

What, no snide remarks from US paid trolls?  Oh, I forget.  Indian slanderous trolls are unlikely to defame their own country.  That would not be in line with Obama's policy to charm one and cold-shoulder the other so that there would be tensions.  Besides, they ought to know which side of the bread is buttered by Washington.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment

Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief