Can Xi Jinping Bring Change to China's Military?
Image Credit: Flickr - Creative Commons License

Can Xi Jinping Bring Change to China's Military?

0 Likes
7 comments

Over the weekend Chinese President Xi Jinping issued an order requiring PLA and People’s Armed Police generals and senior officers to spend two weeks on front lines as enlisted, low-ranking soliders.

According to South China Morning Post, the order stipulates that, “Leaders of regiment- and brigade-level units have to serve on the front line once every three years. Division- and army-level commanders must serve once every four years. Top leaders from army headquarters and military districts will do so once every five years.”

The move is part of an ongoing effort by Xi to impose greater discipline on a military brass that many argue was allowed to grow intolerably corrupt under Xi’s two immediate predecessors. The fear is that the extravagance the military leadership indulges in is reducing the army’s professionalism and alienating officers from the men they command, ultimately curtailing combat-readiness.

Since taking office in November, Xi has taken a number of steps that aim to change this military culture, or at least tame its greatest excesses. Some of these measures have been rather small and symbolic, as when military officers attending the National People’s Congress last month were required to share hotel rooms. Other aspects have been more substantive such as banning expensive banquets and alcohol consumption, as well as prohibiting military officers from obtaining military license plates for their private vehicles.

The new directive imposes similar conditions on the military: “They need to provide for themselves and pay for their own food. They must not accept any banquet invitation, join any sight-seeing tours, accept gifts or interfere with local affairs." 

Unlike the restrictions cited above, however, the demotions here will only be temporary, assuming it is enforced on so many officers at all. 

But the order is more notable for its symbolism, given the parallels it has with Mao’s rule of China when senior Party and military leaders were often forced to perform humiliating feats ostensibly to retain their revolutionary fervor, but really to reinforce Mao’s ironclad rule. As SCMP points out, the military was not exempt from this in all occasions, and was the primary target in at least one campaign in 1958.

The senior CCP leadership’s relationship with the military brass has changed in fundamental ways since Mao and Deng Xiaoping’s time in power. Unlike Mao and Deng Xiaoping, who had both been battle-hardened guerrilla commanders before coming to power, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao hadn’t served in the military and were thus less certain of its leader’s personal loyalty.

From watching Mao and Deng’s reliance on the military, Jiang and Hu grasped the importance of winning this loyalty. Deng underscored this when handing power to Jiang, allegedly recommending that “Out of five working days, spend four with the top brass.”

According to Richard McGregor, Jiang took this message seriously by visiting 100 military installations in his first two years in power, and preparing for all military parades by practicing his moves in front of a mirror the night before.

Hu Jintao himself wasn’t above taking symbolic actions of his own when first coming to power.

As Scott Harold, associate political scientist at the US-based Rand Corporation, told The Diplomat via email:

“At the outset of Hu Jintao’s term he took the Politburo Standing Committee to Xibaipo, the last village the Red Army and the CCP leadership occupied before entering Beiping (now Beijing) as the victors in the Chinese civil war.  The intent was to remind the leadership that they had come from revolutionary origins and had to stay true to the ideals of the founders before they took power and developed the perverse vested interests that unchecked and unaccountable power produces.” 

Unlike Jiang and Hu, though, Xi Jinping is a princeling whose father was a commander in the Red Army during the wars that brought the Communist Party to power. This gives Xi a certain amount of respect with the military brass, many of whom he has known for years. Notably, Xi also differs from his two immediate predecessors in that he inherited the chairmanship of the Central Military Commission, the country’s top military decision-making body, at the same time that he became head of the Party in November.

All of these factors better position Xi to bring change to the military than were Hu and Jiang. Still, the order Xi issued over the weekend is unlikely to have much impact, the Rand Corporation’s Harold predicts.

“I don’t see much reason to think that 15 days out of 365 spent cleaning latrines or eating grunt rations will systematically reshape the thinking of military leaders whose perquisites are almost certainly beyond the imaginings of most enlistees,” Harold says.

“And moreover the nature of Chinese political culture, as well as the mere practical realities of how hierarchically-structured organizations like the armed forces [operate], will make it extremely difficult for the common soldier to treat the generals as genuine colleagues given that they will shortly thereafter go back to being their superior officers.”  

Comments
7
Caseyorourke
April 27, 2013 at 18:50

The cars I saw US generals drive in weren't $100,000 cars, unless they bought it themselves.  Most staff cars for flag officers were more like a family sedan which was purchased directly from the factory by the GSA (usually at a discount) from the lowest bidder and assigned to the base as one of their official vehicles and not to a specific officer.

Tendar Tibet Tsering
April 26, 2013 at 18:22

THats very True.

Derek
April 26, 2013 at 14:30

If this is a sincere attempt to stem the tide of corruption and entitlement to the PLA elite, then good for him.

Likewise, all politicians and millionaires around the world should all spend a few weeks being homeless, so they do not become as detached from reality as they currently are.  Lessons can be learnt here.

vic
April 26, 2013 at 07:16

Yes, the military top brass wants to enjoy the same privileges as the political top brass; after all, they hold the guns.  Since political power grows out of the barrel of a gun, the political bosses got to be nice to the military bosses.  Equal perks are necessary for a power sharing scheme to work in a culture where the rule of law applies only to the unwashed masses and to people without proper connections.

 By the way, can anyone imagine a managing director of an American company spending time on the factory floor ?

 

#next_pages_container { width: 5px; hight: 5px; position: absolute; top: -100px; left: -100px; z-index: 2147483647 !important; }

 

sardonic veritas
April 25, 2013 at 14:59

yeah, i never saw generals in the u.s. being driven around in a $100,000 vehicle before. 

Leonard R.
April 25, 2013 at 08:44

This is a great rule if is strictly enforced. The NCO's & other grunts should not know who these people are. The officers should be subjected to the same discipline & work routine as any other low-ranking enlisted personnel. Finally, there should be no retribution allowed, once they go back to their normal jobs. 

I tip my hat to Xi on this one. The US & UK should take notice. But I'm skeptical it can work. 

Steve
April 25, 2013 at 01:42

They also need to get out of the $100,000 Mercedes. I was in Beijing in May of 2011 we were driving back from the Great Wall and we passed a military base. Out of the gate came two large Mercedes sedans with emergency lights flashing . Our guide explained that they carried high ranking officers probably on their way home to their "estates".

Share your thoughts

Your Name
required
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment
required

Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief