What Do Chinese Netizens Think of North Korea?

 
 

In October, North Korea hosted a huge military parade in honor of the 70th anniversary of its Korean Workers’ Party. North Korean leader Kim Jong-un made a 20-minute speech, his first public address in three years. He thanked his people for their unrelenting support under the American embargo and pledged to put them first. In light of this there has been some commentary about how North Korea might turn from its “Songun,” or “military-first” policy mantra, to a “people-first” policy. Some went as far as predicting how this Kim dynasty might follow in Deng Xiaoping’s footsteps and implement an era of “reform and opening up.”

Given their shared history of struggle and common ideologies, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the People’s Republic of China are blood brothers in a sense. Regardless of what the DPRK does, China will always be involved in some way. The online community seems particularly interested in the North Korea question as well as China-North Korea relations. In this spirit, I made a few posts on Weibo to conduct a mini-investigation into what Chinese netizens think about North Korea. Below I’ll briefly outline the responses I received.

Regarding the future of North Korea, I posted the following question on Weibo: North Korean soldiers were seen carrying ‘nuclear backpacks’ during the parade. Kim Jong-un pledged that his country was ready to enter “any kind of war” with the United States. What are your thoughts?

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.
  1. Do you support a nuclear war between North Korea and the U.S.?
  2. Do you support America using intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) to get rid of the North Koreans?
  3. Do you think China should support using nuclear weapons against the U.S.?
  4. Do you think China should learn from this ‘socialism with anti-Western characteristics’?
  5. Do you think this is none of our business?

Responses from netizens largely focused on option two, with some eager to lead the charge themselves. Naturally, there were some quite constructive remarks reminding China to not let the nuclear enthusiasts take center stage. Some pointed out that if North Korea were to actually acquire nuclear weapons, China would suffer a lot, with its neighborhood peace destroyed. Moreover, as soon as North Korea gets their nuclear weapons, Japan will have every reason to conduct a comprehensive remilitarization, even to acquire its own nuclear weapons. There were also those who thought China will merely play a battle of words and will not actually enter into a U.S.-North Korea conflict, much less get involved in a nuclear war.

Of course, some netizens were delighted to point out that Kim Jong-un’s Korea is the real successor to the communist ideal. However, when others reminded them that they could go over to North Korea and enjoy this for themselves, they immediately responded: this is absolutely none of my business!

Because of the intimate relation between North Korea’s political system, nation, and individual citizens, North Korea’s future is inseparable from that of the Kim family’s. Hence I posted another blog on Weibo:

Written below is a serious, small-scale investigation; please reply sensibly. You predict that Comrade Kim Jong-un’s future will most likely look like this:

  1. He ends up like Nicolae Ceaușescu, killed by his own guards with a machine gun;
  2. He gets bored with the current situation and begins to reform and open up the country, and becomes the beloved North Korean “designer of reform and opening up”;
  3. He ends up like Muammar Gaddafi, beaten to death by rebel fighters;
  4. He decides to become the North Korean version of Chiang Ching-kuo  (son of Chiang Kai-shek), reforms North Korean democracy during his term, and reintegrates the Korean peninsula with the power of democracy, and hence is forever revered by Koreans and the world;
  5. He drifts off into exile in China or Russia;
  6. He ends up like Saddam Hussein, hung after being tried by foreign “invaders”;
  7. He continues to rule with an iron fist, get placed into a crystal coffin so his citizens can pay tribute to him, and lets his son assume his position and continue the “North Korean Dream”;
  8. He dies suddenly due to a combination of diabetes, gout, and other diseases; North Korea goes through a chaotic period without a leader, then moves towards peace and order, finally completing the Korean reunification.

The responses after this question were especially intense. The more gruesome options had their supporters, exposing the hostility circulating the web. But there was also a lot of hope for Comrade Kim Jong-un to be genuinely remorseful, thank his citizens for their support to the Kim dynasty, perform kind deeds, become enlightened, start “reform and opening up,” and at a suitable time peacefully release his power.

From the responses of the netizens, whether we hate him or wish him well, we all know that Kim cannot continue down the path that he’s on. This is a strange phenomenon. In reality, North Korea was Asia’s most stable country in the last half-century. There was a peaceful, predictable transfer of power from each generation to the next. Sure, from time to time you’d hear about people dying of hunger or cruel methods for getting rid of disobedient servants, but at the end of the day there’s never been a genuine image of instability.

But it’s precisely this type of regime that causes us readers deem it as unstable and ready for drastic change. It seems like the questions North Korea and the Kim dynasty most elicit from the world are these: How will you finally fall? How will North Korea change? Of course, for the Chinese people, it’s worth paying attention to how these challenges will affect China going forward.

Meanwhile, to most Chinese, South Koreans are best known for Korean barbecue and television dramas. How is it that the North Koreans are so different? I leave my fellow netizens with the following thought: how does the relationship between people and systems relate to the good and evil inherent in human nature?

The piece originally appeared in Chinese on Yang Hengjun’s blog. You can view the original here

Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief