Almost immediately after this year’s ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) began in Bali, with the hotly contested Spratly Islands firmly on the agenda, members agreed to agree on what they had agreed to previously, the Philippines put their foot in it, and China reacted with familiar belligerence.
Usually the annual ARF – designed for handling regional security issues – has found it politically convenient to shy away from the Spratlys, with ASEAN countries always fearing a round of heavy bullying from China, which defies geographical realities and insists the island chain belongs to it.
This year, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and China have so far agreed to heed the guidelines on implementing the Declaration of Conduct (DOC), which China’s Assistant Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin described in Bali ‘as an important milestone document on the cooperation among China and ASEAN countries.’
This means little – the DOC that provides a framework for future deliberations on territorial claims on the islands was signed way back in 2002.
Discussions so far have been dominated by a push by the 10-nation ASEAN bloc to get talks aimed at convincing North Korea to abandon its nuclear programme back on track, climate change and food security.
The Spratlys are supposed to be clearly on the agenda for the first time, with Indonesia taking the lead in regards to getting the parties involved – including China – to sit down and address the issue.
Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, Taiwan and The Philippines also have claims, particularly parts of the chain that lie within proximity of their territorial limits.
As talks on North Korea got underway, Manila decided enough was enough, and sent a political delegation of four to Pagasa Island, which is populated by about 60 Filipinos, within the disputed chain.
They declared it Philippine territory, which outraged Beijing. Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu insisted China held ‘indisputable sovereignty’ over the island chain. The only problem is, of course, that China’s neighbours don’t agree, while Manila was certainly having none of it.
Presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said that the Kalayaan group of islands was well within the country’s territory and the trip by Teodoro Brawner Baguilat, Ben Evardone, Walden Bello and Arlene Bag-ao was legitimate.
‘There was a municipality there, municipality of Kalayaan, and obviously that’s part of the Philippine jurisdiction, that’s part of the Philippine sovereignty,’ he said.
In Hanoi, rare protests have been held in the lead-up to ARF over China’s stance. Tensions have risen significantly in the area over recent years, with China flexing its growing economic and military might over the chain, which is believed to contain large reserves of oil and gas.
There’s also a push to drop recognition of the name the ‘South China Sea.’ Manila is referring to it as the West Philippine Sea, while Malaysian and Brunei claims are also not without foundation. Taiwan’s claim, though, is fanciful.
Regardless of the merits, a military build-up in the area continues, and the Philippines are now following up the political visits with the deployment of warships. China will no doubt be unimpressed, and so far, the ARF has said little.
Asean_United
more on maritime south east asia…
ocean going vessels….Austronesian expansion.
http://nestmitchtri.blogspot.com/2011/05/shipbuilding-in-se-asia.html
Asean_United
maritime south east asia
http://www.orrvweb.com/IMS/wp-content/uploads/WhitePaper/Philippinestradingships.pdf
James the Australian
Why not just nuked the whole island chain and be done with it!
No islands, no claims and no more quarrel.
malampaya
you forgot to mention the aggressor…
John Chan
Chinese and ASEAN foreign ministers Thursday formally endorsed a set of guidelines on conduct in the South China Sea.
Singapore Foreign Minister 尚穆根 said people should not muddle the guidelines with sovereignty claim. The guidelines is to maintain peace and safety of South China Sea, it has nothing to do with who claim what in South China Sea. Basically ASEAN as an organization does not want to be involved in the territory disputes between the nations in SCS.
Asean_United
@John…you were saying again on Asean Solidarity? Asean may move slow but it will move. Asean may not be as economically or militarily powerful as China or the US but politically…diplomatically…collectively…China has to move with Asean.
Asean backs Philippine proposals on Spratly’s
http://globalnation.inquirer.net/7587/asean-backs-philippines’-proposal-on-spratlys
SCdad07
Need clarification on ASEAN position and I quoted from:
globalnation.inquirer.net/7587/asean-backs-philippines’-proposal-on-spratlys
Members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) have expressed support for the Philippines’ proposal to transform the West Philippine Sea (also known as South China Sea) from a zone of dispute into a “zone of peace, freedom, friendship and cooperation,” according to the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA).
“We have been receiving a lot of support from Asean foreign ministers and this could be shown in their welcoming of our proposal,” said Raul Hernandez, the new DFA spokesperson told reporters Friday.
“They have expressed support to our proposal and for a multi-lateral approach to resolving the issue. The foreign ministers have voiced their support to the resolution of the dispute in the West Philippine Sea… mainly for the peaceful resolution of the conflict in the [region],” he said.
John Chan
South China Sea is a hot topic in the forums in the Chinese media. Most of the analysts realized the difficult situation China is in. The common consensus is that the root of the problem is USA.
It seems the majority commentators suggested that any appeasement approach taken by China will be the beginning of the end of China’s sovergnty in SCS, any conciliatory action taken by China will only encourage ASENA nations to be more aggressive. Sooner or later China needs to pay the price to recover those islands. The price will only go higher if China does not break ASEAN nations’ false hope in SCS.
People suggested China should take actions to show its intention, such as starting active exploration in SCS, firm marine enforcement activities and better diplomatic engagement with USA and ASEAN nations, etc.
It seems the SCS incident is a good test of China’s resolve to deal difficult and complex international issues.
ASEAN-UNITED
John,
I surmised from the way you write that you are a smart and intelligent man who listens to reason. China’s claims on the Spratly’s are totally absurd and ridiculous from any angle. It’s claim of historic discovery is weak at most. I understand though that China feels insecure or belittled if it can’t even control the seas closest to it. But Asean is a non threatening entity. That neither matches China in military nor economic power-even as a whole. The Philippines is resolved to take this issue diplomatically. It has requested arbitration by a third party-The international Tribunal on the Law of the sea-The UN-and the International Court of Justice- a third party. China, while always maintaining it wants to resolve the crisis diplomatically REFUSES any of these third party and international organizations. WHY? Because in the courts and in front of the international system by which all countries are governed including China. It knows it’s claim is weak and will never win . So it resorts to bilateral agreements where it can bully the smaller countries as it slowly creeps and take over the entire sea for itself.
isn’t that right John?
Did you even ask yourself why China has so many border disputes with almost all of it’s neighbors? China is not seen anymore as a benevolent positive power, economically yes..in asia we feel it will help all of us towards a brighter future. But most countries fear it’s rise, it’s harrassment of it’s neighbors, it’s flagrant violation of the DOC. Does China mean to subjugate the south-east asians too like iit did with the Uighurs, Tibetans, Mongolians?
SCdad07
Philippines’ claims are based on:
1) Fil’s Tomas Cloma in 1956 discovered 53 islands and reefs of the Spratlys.
2) Archipelagoes
3) Proximity
Claim #2 has some ground only because UNCLOS came 1994.
US did not rectify it & withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986. Consider Cambodia and Thailand border dispute and IC’s (int’l court)decision resulted into military conflict.
What if world politics amends UNCLOS? What if US & China makes deal?
#3 reminds me Falkland war between England & Argentina.
#1 only has whole world laughing.
I wish all claimants consider the well being of over 500 million people currently live of on the natural resources in region.
People over Sovereignty.
Cyrus
Since when did the Philippines for one became aggressive in terms of the Spratly’s we are perfectly comfortable with the islands we occupy and are not seeking further expansion.
The Philippines would just like China to leave territories occupied by the Philippines alone and stick to what they occupy. What is yours is yours ours is ours.
Sinodefender
If that is the case for the world All non-native americans should leave the U.S.
Asean_united
@john
you are delusional. The seas around south east asia were navigated by the Malays/austronesians long before the Hans of the yellow river valley reached the southern coast of what is now China. You don’t know your own history . Huge Malay ships called Jongs united the disparate islands of peninsular and insular south east asia. Our ancestors navigated these seas for trade ,food and exploration long before Admiral Zheng He ! island south east asia was populated by migrations through this sea. The arrogance of the Chinese is telling in your post when you fail to note this historical facts. We are a maritime people whose influence extends today through Madagascar whose language is Malay/austronesian through Polynesia. Please dump this ignorance somewhere else. The independent and democratic nations of ASEAN would never let communist imperial China strike a dagger into the very heart of south east asia. Go back to the main land!
SCdad07
Asean_U;
I lack understanding on what you posted “Huge Malay ships called Jongs united the disparate islands of peninsular and insular south east asia. Our ancestors navigated these seas for trade ,food and,,,”
Please share links, books or references that we can all read.
Thanks.
Asean_United
Malay ships
http://www.chinahistoryforum.com/index.php?/topic/35279-kapal-melayu-malay-ship/
ozivan
While Authors are free to pen their opinions, we must start to think more deeply too of their intentions and ulterior motives.
Though one may argue that the articles are written for dissemination of information, it should also be argued that if they are often written with slants and bias or intended to create dissensions among readers from different nations,… then it is no good.
The pen can either help bring harmony or strife among readers from different nations,… as one can often read the ugly animosities spewed by bloggers. Moreover, angers are sometimes fanned by outsiders who have no direct interest or well-being of the nations in the Asian region.
I would like to suggest that bloggers pay more attention to the authors. We should hold them to high standards of fairness in reporting and learn to hold them accountable for their opinions by contesting them vigorously if you deem them to be biased and unfair, instead of us bloggers tearing each other apart.
Alternatively, we should ask the Diplomat to encourage authors to equally contribute articles that highlight the good achievements of Asian nations, good leaders -past and present, good and successful policies – past and present of Asian nations, etc etc.
We have too many or lop-sided number of articles in the Diplomat focussing the bad side and things of Asian countries.
Isn’t there anything good to say about North East Asia, South East Asia and South Asia…if I may ask..!?
B.Lo
While [commenters] are free to pen their opinions, we must start to think more deeply too of their intentions and ulterior motives.
Though one may argue that the [comments] are written for [discussion of an article], it should also be argued that if they are often written with slants and bias or intended to create dissensions among readers from different nations,… then it is no good.
“Isn’t there anything good to say about North East Asia, South East Asia and South Asia…if I may ask..!?”
Read any world news outlet in the world. No, there are no nice things to say about any countries. Especially any country that plays a big role in the world. Let me know if you want any cheese with that whine.
Sinodefender
Why is China always the bully if they are protecting there lands?
Cyrus
Because it is well within the Philippines EEZ and is grounded on UNCLOS while China is also a signatory of UNCLOS but refuses to follow the very document they signed.
Ain’t it obvious?
Sinodefender
Do the Philippines have any proof the Spratleys and the other islands are theirs?
Asean-United
The Philippines has sent its foreign minister to China to ask for a third party decision regarding the Spratlys. It’s always looking towards diplomacy to solve this crisis. The International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea, the International Court of Justice and the United Nations -INDEPENDENT, third party organizations to arbitrate and decide the merits of the Philippines and China’s claims. The Philippines is committed to abide by any decisions these international bodies give. China however refuses to go thru these international institutions and would rather resolve to do everything bilaterally or militarilly-where it can manipulate the situation. Why? because China’s claims are weak. It’s historical claims won’t hold water in the International arena. Is China above the Law where all countries are subject?
John Chan
@Sinodefender:
You do not need to feel frustrated, China has been in situations way worse than the current one; comparing to the last 200 years, the current incident in SCS probably is the easiest one. In the old day, China got beaten up, robbed, sacked, raped, smeared, lectured, framed, and not allowed to defend itself too. ASEAN nations are just trying to rip some benefits under the leadership of the bully USA.
At least Chinese bloggers can defend China in the public nowadays; it is way better than before. Chinese bloggers just have to continue to fight and take it one day at a time. If China can’t deal with USA and ASEAN nations right now, probably China is not good enough, but you at least can say you have tried to help.
Sinodefender
Thank you for your kind words John Chan, at times it seems like the whole world criticizes China and never look at their own problems its especially annoying in America where most people think all Chinese are Communist and massacre Uighurs and Tibetans despite the fact Chinese during the Han was in Xinjiang and Uighurs are came after the fall of the Tang. Once the America’s power wanes China will be a benevolent superpower.
Spratly Island, Palawan, Philippines
Communist Chinese Naval Base in the Center of South East Asia. Perfect! That’s what we need!
ozivan
@Sinodefender, You’ll constantly face questions thrown at you relating to China being a signatory to UNCLOS but yet didn’t follow UNCLOS rules, which is not entirely true. 162 countries ratified UNCLOS, but 60 of them ratified them with exceptions or conditions attached to the ratification. China particularly excluded the SCS islands (under archipelagic islands & waters) from their ratification.
All the claimants to SCS except Brunei had conditions/declarations attached, and only recognised UNCLOS rules only to the extent that they don’t clash with their national interest. In other seas, even Russia, United Kingdom, Australia, etc had placed reservations & conditions to their ratifications.
If you wish, please go to article : How Taiwan Can Upstage China, which I wrote a short discourse on UNCLOS on July 5, 2011 and in the article : Beware The South China Sea of another comment I made on July 17, 2011.
Cyrus
Will read Ozivan when I am on my Rest Day. Sadly im on working this days and do not have the leisure to read it.