At first glance Australia and The Philippines are distant neighbors with similar trade dominated interests in the Pacific but their relationship could hardly be described as close. Nevertheless they both stand as long-term allies of the United States and that carries its own responsibilities.
Earlier this week, The Philippines senate, amid heightened territorial conflicts with China, ratified an accord after four years of considerations that would allow Australian soldiers to train with the Filipino military inside the country.
Supporters say the agreement will bolster defense in The Philippines which has struggled against a show of military muscle by China around the resource-rich disputed islands in the seas and international shipping lanes which divide The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and China.
It’s a sensitive issue.
The Philippines constitution forbids foreign troops from basing themselves permanently inside the country. Visits must be ratified by the senate which struck a similar deal with U.S. forces who have been in-country for a decade battling Islamic al-Qaeda-linked militants.
As a former American colony, The Philippines’ relationship with Washington is on a different level than with Canberra and approval of the accord is purely symptomatic of the escalating tensions involving the Spratly Islands.
That chain of remote islands sits largely within the 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the country’s southwest coast and are geographically a part of The Philippine archipelago.
Senator Eduardo Angara perhaps best summed up the mood saying his country required a "network of protective friends" amid threats from China which he described as "a very powerful country that already extends its claims close to the doorstep of our country."
The accord was also signed-off on as Vietnam and The Philippines tackled China over the Paracel Islands, further to the north of the Spratlys where China has announced plans to garrison troops in Sansha, a move that Vietnam says violates international law.
U.S. Senator John McCain has weighed in describing the deployment as “unnecessarily provocative” and an action that is “disappointing and not befitting a responsible great power."
For the Australians, the accord will not automatically lock their troops onto the front lines if heightened tensions threaten to escalate into a conflict, a scenario that no one in Southeast Asia, the U.S. or Australia wants to see.
The accord also allows Australian forces to train Filipinos in the management of natural disasters and terrorism, and was initially drafted when the War on Terror in Southeast Asia was nearer its peak.

Major Lowen Gil Marquez, Phil Army
The military exercise between the Philippines and australian armed forces is a sign of felowship, camaraderie and networking relationship to train both forces on search and rescue, disaster relief, counter terroirsm which is the responsibility of everynation to handle it for the benefit of the world peace.
This Balikatan exercise like in the US armed Forces will have its own version to Australian military, will have also a benefit to both countries for the defense of their nation at any terms that a conflict arise perpetrated by the communist dictatorship, this exercise will gave a better relationship to two nations as an alies of the USA and under the umbrela of the United Nation that may help also the Philippines in protecting the Scarborough shoal and Spratley island at the Western Philippine Sea which is violently and illegally intruded by the Chinese communist military dictatorship government..
cesabarre
I think everyone now craves for a new global war.
vic
No, there will be no global war. There is now a major show displaying American aggressiveness versus Chinese assertiveness. America wants to preserve its 'primacy' in the world, while the Chinese will undermine that primacy, because it wants a better deal, by changing the rules created by the established Western Powers, mainly USA. China is in no position to lead the world nor does it want that role as yet. We definitely know the following:
- China does not want US naval forces, which are packed with offensive nuclear weapons, in SCS. American naval fleet does not fall under the heading of "innocent passage". Is China's anti-access strategy enough to preserve peace in SCS.
- Chinese RMB will slowly and surely become a major world currency, thus diminishing the US dolla'sr role as a world reserve currency. It is in China's interest that US dollar remains stable.
- China's space program will be in competition with America's as America will not accept China as a partner in space. Space will be weaponized by both countries.
- For the forseeable future, America will still be the preferred country for most countries. China's ascent will better the lives of Chinese and thse of the developing countries.
- America and China will have parallel civilization values.
- A major nuclear war between the two nations is not inevitable. However, the onus will be on China to preserve peace and order, as American aggressiveness is dependent on Chinese assertiveness.
nirvana
@vic,
>>"China is in no position to lead the world…" (vic)
I admire your (false) humility. So, the wannabe "Godfather of the SCS" (according to your own words) can not lead the world?
Please check these:
- China has become the first CO2 polluter
- China was the first to conduct anti-satellite destruction in outer space
- China is the first in death penalty executions.
- China is the first in forced abortion.
- China has one of the highest Gini index.
- China has the largest fishing fleet (and is in the first league of over fishing countries).
May I add that China has become the first country in duplicity?
Frank Rizzo
China is playing the bully because it knows no in the region is going to face up to them, I would like to see more US Troops back in the PI, It will not only assist in their National Secuirty but assist in pushing dollars and pounds into their coffers and why not?
vic
Yes, China is a slow-acting bully, it is now enforcing what it said as a policy more than 60 years ago. I suppose with American troops back in the Philippines, it gives Filipinos that feeling of security against an imagined impending invasion. American boots on ground will scare off Chinese sailors sailing nearby with the added gift that Chinese ships will simply disappear and that untold bounty beneath the seabed is for Philippines to dig (if they have the financial and technical resources to do so) without disturbance. Mabuhay the Fil-American relationship.
nirvana
@vic,
Check these facts with your scholars:
-China didn't say anything about its intention when it "published" the "nine dotted line" in 1947.
- It didn't mention the "dotted line" when it protested the San Francisco peace Treaty in 1952.
- It didn't say anything about the "dotted line" when it published its "territorial waters" declaration in 1958.
- It didn't mention the "dotted line" in its reservation when it ratifies UNCLOS in 1996.
- It didn't say anything about the meaning of the "dotted line" when it sent its verbal note to UNCLOS in 2009.
- The famous line doesn't have an official name, official coordinates.
A sovereignty claim can not be based on increasing capability, in a rule-of-law world.
An expansionist imperialistic policy indeed follows war readiness.
Dan
Wonderful exchange of reader's comments. Having said this, and as an American with good friends from Vietnam, Philippines, and China, may I naively suggest that we all work together for a better world and future for our children? The world grows ever smaller in the sense that there is more intermingling and intermarriage of peoples. Those Vietnamese, Chinese, or Filipino people that we are all so ready to shoot today, will be our spouses, children, and in-laws tomorrow.
Vic
As long as the American military-industrial complex is intact, the world will always be at war in one place or another. Using military to solve problem is habitual of the US government. Once the military is involved – "they ain't my brothers nor my sisters, nor my children " is the motto.
JohnX
I would say that looking at the issues and ignoring the propaganda that gets promoted on here, that China appears to be reaching a decesion point.
It seems to be a divide in thier country between those who support the PLA and thier more aggressive stance which could lead to conflict. One of an age old conflict that exists for all military units, "Enough of the training, when can I do this for real". This seems to be thier drive with a more nationalistic bent that is supported by some in the CCP.
The other side seems to be those Chinese who are benefiting from a world of trade without turmoil who can foresee more benefit in trade and becoming wealthy and have more in common with people of thier economic class regardless of where they live than they do with thier own poor people.
The question for the CCP is what happens when the middle class are created in China and they want the holidays, the lifestyle and they also learn the otherside of the equation which is why not the political system of voting for thier Government. They will look at Singapore and see that Chinese can vote and have a resonsible democracy.
Therefore CCP needs to understand whether it can exist in a world of free information or must they continue to shape peoples ideas.
Its a struggle that seems to be ongoing and as to which side will win it is yet unsure, I am not even sure that the Chinese themselves yet know, but whether they promote an aggressive nationalistic face to the world or an open armed trade based face is not yet settled.
If anything the Chinese should try to learn from the South Koreans as they are going through a similar process of understanding themselves in relation the rest of the world and it seems to be benefiting them to be more open than hermit.
Though I am sure that the nationalistic supporting Chinese commentators will be heard first on here as everyone knows that a loud angry barking dog is heard before a quiet friendly one. (Though I am not equating that Chinese are dogs).
JohnX
Hell Yeah,
I rocked that one. Oh, come on, you understand it.
We who will walk together, will live together.
vic
These naive Filipino politicians think that Australia will fight on their behalf. They think and act like freeloaders. None bothered to check the trade volume between Australia and China. Would Australia pick a figh twith China over the Scarborough Reef and therby jeopardizing their trade relations with China. Philippines must be desperate to expect "help" by allowing visiting forces. Really pathetic.
Errol T
You really love putting us down, don't you? Why do you think Australia will fight for us? That's not their purpose. Besides, you said it yourself. No one would land troops against our islands to assume the headache involved in running the archipelago. Aussies will be here to cross-train our troops. That's why it's called a Visiting Forces Agreement and not a Mutual Defense Pact. Read the last part of the article better.
vic
@Errol T
I would never try to put people down. But the fact is this accord was finally pushed through because the politicians were thinking more of protection against imagined sovereignty challenge in the high seas. There were quite a few comments on this in the Philippine press, Asia cheered when the Philippines kicked out the American bases. They were staging grounds for aerial bombing attacks on Vietnam; the civilian casualties were astounding, and America couldn't care less. Cheap Asian lives. Furthermore, the bases made life degrading for the camp followers and their families.
Well, the "visiting force" is a play on words; it is almost, but not quite the same, as permanent bases. Once, you have foreign troops on your soil, "sovereignty" is definitely compromised. I suppose that supporting American aggressiveness against Chinese assertiveness is now about to be in play in Asia. How will that end up? Who knows? But one thing is for sure, skirmishes may now be more common and more deadly.
Vic
A country usually does not compromise its sovereignty by letting foreign troops on its soil. Visiting forces are a play on words, not quite, but very close to the concept of foreign bases in Philippines. This is a backward step after Philippines had successfully evicted American military bases. Well, playing American aggressiveness against Chinese assertiveness might initially look attractive, but it does not address the real situation: the world situation has changed and Chinese growth to power will alter power relationships. Aussie is just another dimension to the American forces; for Philippines to be identified with the Western camp shows an obvious cling to an outdated colonial dependency.
Cyrus
@Vic Not really, it is for Political Expediency. The Visiting Forces Agreement with Australia is not the same as the United States wherein we have a Mutual Defense Pact. Though the Visiting Forces with Australia would help the Filipino and Australian Troops interoperate in case of War.
That said, we are not clinging to an outdated colonial mentality. Reason dictates that in order for us to have a leverage against China we need allies, hence the United States our biggest Ally and Benefactor. Australia is a welcome addition since she has been a local member of SEATO and another Ally is always welcome to a weak and delapidated Military like the AFP.
China really does need to review its Policy in the South China Sea you are actually hanging yourself in the neck.
vic
I suppose by showing Aussie and American troops, the Chinese will leave Scarborough Reef and the Spratly's. Filipinos got it right. The Chinese will give up their "core interests" in SCS. This shows how successful Philippines' show of force really is. Why didn't I think of this first?. Del Rosari is really smart, no wonder the Americans love him and call him "a Renaissance man".(he was so happy he couldn't sleep for nights; no Filipino has been so honored by Americans)
Errol T
Make China leave us alone? Unlikely. As you put it, we're naive, but not that naive. To put it simply, better proficiency at counter-terrorism, and hopefully counter-insurgency, means we can better manage the 2 insurgencies we have. The sooner we can put a stop to those, our AFP can finally fix its orientation and doctrine.
Cyrus
@Vic Read what I'm trying to say, I said leverage in negotiations or in prestige one way or another. With the Visitng Forces Agreement with Australia we would be receiving grants and gifts of Military Equipment. Equipment which would really help our troops. Inter-operability which in case of war is very important for the two Armed Forces which could operate together effectively.
Hence, the Visiting Forces Agreement with Australia is a welcome news for the Philippines which seeks to built more alliances with other nations.
vic
@Errol T
Counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency support by the allies? The problem can be easily solved – give autonomy to Mindanao. Manila's incompetence in ruling the south has been there for all to see. It is not inclusive of the south; it took advantage of the south's resources and never give back much in return. Yes, the Christian north took advantage of the Moslem south. There is incompatiblity of popular religion and the south is more "native" than the north. North has been colonized, but the south has always resisted invasion from colonial powers and the Christian Filipinos. If the south were given independence it would become much richer while the north will become much poorer. Yes, Manila could not see where the good fortune really is – Mindanao; Manila loves politics for politic's sake.
Errol T
Easier said than done. Giving autonomy to the whole of Mindanao won't be as good as you think it is. For starters, parts of western Mindanao are already autonomous. Check the cash flow. The national government poured billions of pesos into the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) but most got pocketed by local clan lords. Case in point is the Ampatuan clan. In the previous administration they were the overlords of ARMM. See what happened. They got drunk with power and wealth and actually had the nerve to massacre civilians, especially media personnel. Autonomy isn't the solution. What it boils down to is choosing the lesser of evils. And don't think ARMM is a money-maker either. Agriculture remains the primary source of income in ARMM and the biggest employer is the local government units. How about the CPP-NPA? They fight for communism. Even Beijing no longer follows pure communism. Any ideas how to handle that one?
ian
It is very funny for the 50c army to try to speak for the people of the phillipine or viet nam or SEA as the occasion arises. Don't they realise how disliked they are, even in places like HK or Singapore where one would think natural sympathy is with china. Most people can differentiate between the smart and hard working people of china and the maschists in government, and no one like to see the PRC coming anywhere near what they worked so hard for. At least this JC is much better than his counterparts in the comment section in the Economists; those guys really show us what the PRC is like.
The actions by China of recent months bring significant actions in response, the above is just one of many. No amount of BS will mask it. The US is no Angel but thanks to China they are increasingly being regarded as just that for countries in the region.
The reality is that China will hurt itself just as badly if not more if war comes about. Virtually all its trade goes through the disputed area and many countries in the region has or will have the capacity to make it too dangerous for trade to go through. As for a ground war with VN( the one most likely to happen), please, if the world only super power could not win, how can a bunch of mummy's boys from china can. Before the insults flies, please remember that chinese humiliations over the centuries are something the world see very often ( youtubes and google are fantastic) and people can throw a lot more insults your way than vice versa.
John Chan
Your whole comment talks nothing about the article but slandering China, it seems you are behaving worse than the 50c army.
USA is the most hated nation ever appears in history; in the old days people admitted their atrocity was for their greed, by the USA wants to gloss over their atrocity as a gift of western culture to the victims, installing democracy, caring for human rights, etc. a bunch of hypocritical pretendence.
The reality proves you are wrong, China’s trade volume going thru the disputed areas is increasing and safe, because no nation in those areas want to do something harmful to itself, those nations include the Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, India and the USA.
VN is not as naïve as the Philippines, it will behave, it knows PLA won’t stop at Hanoi like last time if it provokes another confrontation with China.
“Yankee go home” is the best choice for the American, for its economy, for its security and for the peace of the world.
Cyrus
@JC "Most hated" really? It's hilarious really. Who says so actually? Even the Philippines the only Colony of America doesnt condemn it as evil. Yes we did study our history we know what happened during the Philippine-American War and the atrocities that was committed. That was overshadowed by World War II and how both Filipino and Americans fought side by side against the Japanese to Defend the Philippines.
How Americans treated the common man, how they opened up Public Education, Healthcare, and Social Services. Something we never got from Spain, thus we are appreciative even being a Colony we were treated right.
John Chan
@Cyrus,
The people of the nations that were devastated by the US’ regime change in name imposing American model say that the US and its lackeys are the “Most hated.” Those nations spread from Americas, Europe, Middle East to Asia.
The 1% of the Americans treat rest of the human beings as serfs to be squeezed. During the Spanish was in the Philippines, public education, healthcare and social service were a foreign concept not only the Europeans it was also to the American.
China helps the Philippines economy via trades and aids, why doesn’t the Philippines show some appreciation to China as they have done to the American? Is it because China an Asian nation, such appreciation would run against Filipino’s cargo cult culture?
Errol T
Coz the trade and the aid come with a slap-in-the-face imperialism, that's why. Beijing's demands are so outrageous and so condescending that it's hard to swallow. A poor nation can't be choosy, but sure as hell it can feel resentment.
Sun Da Pao
Why recent China persist on these course of action that make even SEA nationals of chinese descent feel revulsive towards her? It pains us :-(
Ian
Chan is SUCH an ENGLISH name..hmm..maybe not, and in regard of your irrational rant I am sure not, hmmm ..hmmm , maybe a CHINESE name…funny that!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahahaha…you would be surprised by what Chinese people living in MY country, tell me about Chinese people living in CHINA, they say,and this is a direct quote, "Don't trust them Ian, they are CHINESE!" and that is from a Chinese person living in MY country who consider themselves ONE of us and we consider every one who has came from some where else to live here as ONE of us. I was in hospital here recently, the anaethist assisant was a Chinese lady, we had a conversation, she said, "in OUR beautiful country, " meaning HERE..I cried, because she was right, it is human here, its is decent, it is FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE and it is NOT the USA!
vic
The Philippine Constitution forbids foreign troops on its soil. So after four years, Philippines made a decision. How does one define political prostitution? An accord of convenience to let others gain entry.
Freedom For Asia
yeah the philippine constitution forbids foreign troops from conducting war operations especially in the troubled south!.That agreement is for sole training purposes only.You are always acting like you know anything but actually a arrogant paid troll.
Cyrus
@Vic atleast you could have read the 1987 Philippine Constitution. There is no such thing as no Foreign troops in our soil. It just specifies that no permanent base can be erected in the Philippines, Republic of.
Ian
I am not sure WHAT the Philippines is doing for Australia…perhaps you do KNOW..how about sharing it with us then? 20 Million Australians, 100 million Philippino's 320 Million United Statesians and 1.4 BILLION Chinese. How about growing a capacity to think clearly?
John Chan
Is Australia compensating the Filipino farmers for the damages the Australian troops done to their rice fields as show in the photo? If the Manila regime let Australia go free, then the Australian troops are the military occupation force in the Philippines.
It is a prudent decision for the Australia, it pushes its forward defense from Darwin to the Philippines islands, it can fight battles on a foreign land, if it fails to halt the enemy in the Philippines, it can change posture before the Australia is invaded.
It seems the Philippines does not realize it has signed an agreement to becoming a killing field for the British Empire outpost.
Cam
@john chan.
Have you ever seen real rice fields with patches of dirt divided between them? Instead of sitting comfortably in the propaganda room in Beijing, you should labor hard in the fields at day and study the red book at night as your chairman Mao taught you. You bark at anything you don’t know for sure is beyond stupid. The Philippines does a right thing by inviting the Australians to confront the bully China. Now she has to face her enemies everywhere. The noose is tightening.
John Chan
@Cam,
Here is a picture of a field of rice (http://photoshd.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/a-japanese-rice-field/), tell me whether that field the soldiers tamping on is a rice field or not. It seems the patch is planted up to a dirt wall and the grey background is not a dirt divider. Be honest, tell me who is barking and who is stupid.
Cyrus
@JC look at pictures of the Philippines. That maybe picture might be taken in Afghanistan, diffinetly not in the Philippines the background in itself will tell you.
Research some more JC.
ceax
Those are new plants.
Usually there are pathways which allows the farmers to roam around and spray festicides. Not a big deal.
As for the term "Invasion Force", thats kinda ridiculous for the fact that an Invasion force is a hostile force to the host land which is not the case.
Don't be a bad Chinese Chan! you know that your government is a pain in the assess not only for the other races but also for the billions of Chinese people.
John Chan
@ceax,
Explaining away foreign military boots on the ground as allies and saviors was the standard justification for those collaborators of Axis powers, it seems you are reviving that old treacherous trait as new fab.
Errol T
Sigh.. The photo you showed shows maturing rice stalks. The field the Aussie is walking on is dry, and yet the plants are still young. As an Asian, you of all people should know that young rice shoots need standing water to grow and thrive. You only drain the water when the harvest is approaching. Unless China was able to develop rice varieties that actually grow on dry land? If so, China should announce it to the world.
Sven
Do you honestly think Australia is in ANY danger from ANY Asian power?
No country or nation in Asia could invade or hope to fight Australia. Not because Australia is a powerful nation military wise, but because they have alliances with the most powerful nations on earth.
The only nation which would want to attack Australia would be China, and that is a 1% possibility due to China and Australias close economic ties.
China can't just play the game…They are aggressive to the nations they share borders with and still have not gotten their dog "North korea" on a tighter leash. How long till North Korea decide to do ACTUALLY do something? I hope for China's sake never, because as soon as North korea do ANYTHING the USA and Its allys (Which are ever growing due to China not treating its neighbours with respect.) will destroy them.
John Chan
@Sven,
China is the biggest trading partner of most nations particular within the nations that are hostile and encircling China. It is a myth that trade will improve relationship; the minute China tries to stop any of its trading partner from taking advantage of China, they all become hostile and bellicose like sworn enemies. The West is even propagating “economy and politics decoupling” theories after the “China Threat” theory, what is the West up to? Only God knows.
The bellicose tone in your comment definitely showing Australia is not a friendly nations.
Errol T
Weird… My post disappared. Anyways, @JC, what I was trying to say is the photo above is nowhere in the Philippines. Wrong climate for starters. And also, rice paddies here in the Philippines are wet, just like in China.
Also, saying that our islands will be a buffer zone is assuming that China and Australia will go to war. Why would that be?
And killing fields? Can you cite episodes where Australians massacred civilians?
Flam
@john chan
I’m going to disagree with you Australlia and Philippines pact sign-off train filipino soldiers for war and terrorism situation. This pact will strenghten the defense capability of Philippines most importantly in dealing with invasion and terrorism which I believe this is step is timely. You are smearing Philippines that they will be british empire outpost you didn’t read the article properly this things will unlikely happened according to the constitution of Philippines.
John Smith
I hope your not refering to the picture in the article. That's from the middle east.
And for your information, Australia has some of the worlds highest standards for military ethic and engagement. Having liberated several countries from terrorist and unstable scourage and providing stability not only to East Timor, Afghanistan and the Solomon islands. They simultaniously are positively involved with Singapore and Indonesia and none of this 'old world' dogma you speak of exists what so ever. The Australian's and FIlipino's both share a common ally, a common threat and a common region.
It seems your the one who doesn't realise, not the phillippines.
John Chan
@John Smith,
Putting a photo from the Middle East in an article about the Philippines, it seems fabricating evidence to mislead the general public; a serious breach of journalist’s ethics and creditability.
China has been the locomotive that bring the Asia-Pacific out of its old colonial economic model into a booming and most dynamic economic region in the world, and China does it through the peaceful means, Australia is one of major benefitters from that peaceful transformation too.
Now China has grown beyond the comfort zone of the Anglo’s traditional view on Asian, suddenly Australia’s ex-PM was advocating that China was the most dangerous threat to the Western value and model; the Australian political elites were advocating the needs of nuclear deterrence against China for Australia; China’s investment in Australia is a national security threat; and Australia is rounding up SE Asian nations into joint military cooperation; if all those hostilities were not based on the ‘old world’ dogma, then what does such drastic change of attitude base on?
Errol T
Isn't questioning this site's integrity a bit too much just because you were mistaken in interpreting the photo above? The site wanted to feature an Aussie soldier, and that image was handy. Period.
ceax
I think China has now deployed at least one Rep for every web forum. Great idea.
Errol T
Meh. It's a job at least.
Freedom For Asia
a killing field for the british empire? are you nuts John? and for your info that picture is taken from afghanistan not in the philippines!
Cyrus
@JC before making a comment I would suggest that you do a little research rather than spouting nonsense.
Ian
YOU IDIOT, if Australians die defending the Philippines from an invader that is o k is it? But if they succumb to greater number s of the enemy and still die but have to retreat that is not ok? Do you have a brain cell? IT IS NOT
PHILIPPINO's defending Australia, I am not sure if you may have missed that bit?????????? How about a reply on that?