Beijing, London, and Los Angeles all have dismal air quality histories. While far from perfect, London and Los Angeles have emerged from the worst of their air pollution days. Beijing, seemingly now at its worst when it comes to air quality, can learn from these two cities.
London and Beijing both have histories of relying on coal for heating. In cold weather, both cities have been immersed in smog that spews from boilers working to keep residents warm. The Great Smog of 1952 created a panic in London and spurred new legislation to clean the air. And the “dash-to-gas” after exploration of the North Sea oil fields enabled the city to increase its use of cleaner-burning gas and become less reliant on coal.
Beijing, meanwhile, grasped most of the low-hanging fruit in its green leap by moving industry away from the city before it hosted the 2008 Olympic Games. The last four coal-fired power plants remaining inside the city will be replaced by gas in a few years. And Beijing should be applauded for boldly promising to nearly halve the city’s coal consumption from 27 to 15 million tons between 2010 and 2015.
But more can be done. Beijing could lead the bold transition to renewable energy to replace burning coal and could focus on improvements in the transportation sector—both are major sources of smog.
Among the three cities, Los Angeles takes the lead for promoting renewables. California law requires electricity companies to obtain one-third of their energy from renewable resources by 2020. Los Angeles itself launched a range of programs like the Solar Incentive Program to encourage businesses and homeowners to install solar photovoltaic systems and increase solar power usage, and it directs its municipal utility to harness more wind power for electricity production. Beijing could certainly draw on these experiences in its own development of renewables.
Los Angeles has also pushed to electrify transportation through a rebate program and tax incentives to make purchasing electric vehicles more attractive options to customers. As a result, in 2012, the hybrid Toyota Prius became the best-selling car in California, and the state’s sales accounted for more than one-fourth of total Prius sales in the United States.
However, this is not just about making more electric cars. Congested roads and high concentrations of vehicle emissions are current challenges as well. And Beijing’s public transportation system could be a potential source of greener development.
As of this year the city’s subway system is the longest in the world, and its public transit system benefits from the city’s generous subsidies and massive investment. But there are still some subtle lessons Beijing can learn from London.
Britain’s capital has an incredibly integrated public transit system that is closely linked with its bike-share system. London has worked to improve pedestrians’ walking environment, enabling citizens to more efficiently navigate the city on foot. Large businesses are also required to incentivize employees to carpool, utilize transit, or bike or walk to work.
Compact city planning has led to the development of multiple hubs around London, in contrast to the uncontrolled urban sprawl around Los Angeles and Beijing. That means transportation and emissions are less concentrated in the city center, and hence the impact of exposure to those emissions is less hazardous.
London has also adopted a congestion fee, which imposes a charge on motor vehicles operating in the city center during high-traffic times, to curb unnecessary road use and encourage carpooling and public transit use from city outskirts. Beijing could learn from all of these efforts, as it appears, in some cases, to be doing.
Yet, cleaning the air is never an easy task. And although these and other measures have helped Los Angeles and London improve their air quality over time, there is no silver bullet.
Reducing air pollution requires a continuous transition process that lasts for decades, not the sort of one-off campaign that has prevailed in China’s previous environmental efforts. Still, there are small and quick steps that Beijing can take to avoid extremely bad days.
When poor weather conditions are foreseen, special measures should be undertaken, such as enacting temporary traffic controls for lower-emissions-standards vehicles and dampening dust from construction and traffic. Open-fire burning of biowaste and trash in suburban and rural Beijing should also be strictly prohibited.
This effort may seem daunting. But Beijing has a huge advantage over Los Angeles and London. Scientific advances make targeting specific hazardous gases much easier than it used to be. Los Angeles and London continued to experience unhealthy air for years if not decades after the worst days of their air pollution had passed. Beijing’s cleanup could be much faster. And a successful transition in Beijing would set an example for China’s ongoing urbanization and for many other cities in the emerging world that are suffering from the pains of rapid development.
Wang Tao is a resident scholar and E. Tucker Hirsch is a research assistant at the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy.

Kim’s Uncle
There are a lot gross things in china today and the fact that china is run by a thug dictatorship makes it even more grotesque.
Victims
It also failed to mention that rainy SPIT that can comes from a passing buses or cars in Beijing.
People love to pee to the wall of the hospitals and public buildings as well.
Liang1a
The article failed to mention aborted fetuses are dumped into river and waterway causing huge enviromental hazards.
a_canadian_observer
Where are all the CCP paid 50 centers?
Samurai X
You have to realize that China has 4,000 years of history with being enslaved by conquerors. Most of Chinese live in China today had migrated from somewhere else, and their logical thinking is to make the best uses of the lands and unknown people around them while they can, hoping to make wnough maney before the new invaders arrive and you are forced to free elsewhere.
They don’t think about how the forests or rivers would be from 50 years from now. They don’t even care what they eat because the damages in their bodies from the heavy metals and chemicals might only show up 20 years from now. That’s too far in the timeline that they can understand. The Chinese enviromental issues are unfixable.
Nakahiro
Greedy Chinese make everything a commodity. They will kill themselves by polluting their air before they invade other countries' territories. Communist China's collapse is around the corner.
Be Way
HELLo, little Japanese,
When your Fukushima nuclear disaster was spewing out toxic dangerous radioactive all over Asia especially its neighbors China and Korea, both Korea and China not only don't accuse Japan of gross negligence and misdemeanor but they even contribute generosity and voluntarily to your ugly kind. Comparing the toxic radioactive which is many millions of times more harmful, against a little smog is simply preposterous. The selfishness and ugliness of the inhumane Japanese obviously has no limits.
Free Thinker
It's ironic, for all the accusations you level at the Japanese, you spew the most filthy racist hate I've seen from a human…
"The selfishness and ugliness of the inhumane Japanese obviously has no limits."
Disgusting attitudes like this belong in the middle ages.
a_canadian_observer
@Be Way: The Fukushima incident was not man made, i.e., Japan did not do it on purpose. By the way, what was china's contribution? NOTHING! In fact, china even took the opportunity to stop selling rare earth material to Japan, with the hope of crippling Japan's economy. I guess that's china's contribution.
Nakahiro
@Be Way
Wake up. A Tsunami caused the nuclear disaster ok, we can't prevent a gigantic tsunami ok. Its called an accident and was caused by nature. On the other hand China can and has the power and solutions to stop the air quality we see and hear everyday. You sick man of Asia have no limits to your ignorance.
w
Drew
Be Way, you are one racist person.
Be Way
Please read on the outcome of the inquiry that concluded that Fukushima Incidence is a Man-Made Disaster which is specifically what I am trying to highlight on the Japanese gross negligence and misdemeanor. Also especially to the little low class Japanese , please don't curse others with your foul word as it will only reflect on your lack of good upbringing and maturity.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jul/05/fukushima-meltdown-manmade-disaster
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-05/fukushima-nuclear-disaster-was-man-made-investigation-rules.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/world/asia/fukushima-nuclear-crisis-a-man-made-disaster-report-says.html
Lnrds
I saw on the news the pollution is that bad in China that some rich business man was selling/giving away cans of…air.
I saw them opening the can and sucking the air out of it. It's crazy by the time you open it and inhale the so called "fresh air in a can" its probably lost its fresshness. How can China, its citizens and this business man be so dumb? How about fix and regulate the heavy polluters or really invest into renewable energy for a start.
I'll give them credit though…its probably the only product they did not copy from a western company.