China National Offshore Oil Corporation's (CNOOC) $15.1 billion bid for Canada’s Nexen energy, a Calgary-based firm with oil assets in the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, and in Alberta’s oil sands, is highlighting the pros and cons of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) investing in North American resources.
Chinese SOEs have long been major players in resource developments in Africa and in underdeveloped countries on China’s periphery like Myanmar and Laos, where their financial and political heft has, more or less, given them carte blanche to do as they please. Their forays into North America has been much less successful, however, with Minmetals move to acquire Canadian mining giant Noranda in 2004 having been defeated as a result of strong public opposition, negative reactions (it was eventually dropped) and CNOOC’s bid for Unocal meeting a similar fate the very next year. But China’s SOEs have learned their lessons and are taking a more sophisticated approach, acquiring minority holdings in several oil sands producers, and preparing the political ground better than in the past.
CNOOC’s bid is helped by the fact that Canadian Prime Minister Harper has been actively courting Chinese investment and markets for Canadian oil and gas. Encouraging Chinese investment in Canada was a central feature of Harper’s last visit to China in February, and since the rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline by the Obama Administration, a facility that would have significantly increased Canadian oil exports to the US, Harper has made a point of saying that Canada is ready to sell its oil and gas to those who want to buy it, a not so subtle invitation to Beijing and other Asian nations.
The Canadian oil industry seems to be generally onside with the acquisition although there are those who caution against allowing SOEs to expand their role. The provincial government in Alberta has likewise shown no sign of opposition, leaving it to the federal government in Ottawa to make the call as to whether or not this investment will bring “net benefit” to Canada. Since the rules for “net benefit” have not been clearly defined, the government has ample scope to either approve or reject CNOOC’s bid, depending on its political calculations. Given Mr. Harper’s overtures to the Chinese, as well as the possibility of the two countries launching free trade negotiations at some point in the future, the chances are good that the takeover will be approved, probably subject to some undertakings regarding maintenance of substantial operations at Nexen’s operations in Calgary. Some commentators have called for Canada to use China’s interest in acquiring more oil, gas and mineral assets in Canada as a negotiating chip in the forthcoming FTA talks, should they be launched.
The bid could face obstacles in the U.S., however, given that Nexen has holdings in the Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer, a longtime China skeptic, has signaled that he has concerns over Chinese acquisition of U.S. resources and wants the deal reviewed by the same process that persuaded the Chinese to withdraw their Unocal offer. A decision by the U.S. to disallow CNOOC’s acquisition of the Gulf of Mexico assets would force Nexen to divest them.
Meanwhile, all is not smooth sailing for a proposed Northern Gateway pipeline that will have to be built from the oil sands in Alberta through the neighboring province of British Columbia (BC), to a planned terminal on the north Pacific coast, if Canadian oil is to be moved to China or elsewhere throughout Asia. Not only are most aboriginal groups, across whose traditional territories that pipeline will have to cross, opposed, but the BC government has laid out five conditions that it says will have to be met if it is to give its approvals for the pipeline and tanker terminal. One of these is that BC receive a greater share of the benefits of the project, a demand that Alberta premier Alison Redford has flatly rejected. While this inter-provincial standoff continues, there are many other hurdles that must be overcome before Alberta oil finds its way to the west coast, and from there onto China-bound tankers.
None of this, however, will prevent Beijing from, acting through CNOOC, Sinopec, and other SOEs, using its deep pockets to obtain greater access and control over energy and natural resources in North America, especially in Canada where the political dynamic is more favorable to Chinese interests than in the United States.
The Nexen acquisition, if approved, is likely to be the harbinger of more forays by Chinese SOEs into Canada.
Hugh L. Stephens is Executive in Residence at the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, in Vancouver, with 35 years of government and business experience in Asia. He is also principal of Trans-Pacific Connections.

tocharian
Most Canadians have a very naive view about the China's geo-political ambitions. The only "foreign country" they know well is the USA and Canadians seem to have a rather silly and childish "love-hate" relationship with their "American Cousins". There is even a bit of "Schadenfreude" in Canada that the American economic engine seems to be spluttering still. Harper doesn't really like Obama, so he's cosying up to the Chinese, saying Canada needs investment from the Chinese Communist Party owned "enterprises" (CCPOE). The tarsands lobby in Alberta agrees of course since their brains are hard-wired to short-term thinking (making a quick buck) without any long-term caution about environmental and other damages to Canada. China has money and they want a piece of it by selling off Canada's natural resources. In my opinion, given that Canada should nationalise important natural resources. I blame Wall Street and the greedy corporations for China's "rise". Now China has (i) loads of money, (ii) most of the manufacturing jobs and (iii) reverse-engineered technology (even stealth fighters). What can Canada offer the Chinese? "Bitumen-sands", drilling technology, deep-sea-ports, timber, minerals, nice real estate for the "rich and famous Chinese" (people well connected to the Communist party) and what else? oh I forgot foreign aid and seals (Harper even wanted to sell seal meat to the Chinese!)
cupoftea
Beijing has even planted her bidders/apologists in strategic positions (industry & govt.) in Alberta; the Canadians will not know what hit them, lol. One has to look no further than the pro-Beijing propaganda spewed in http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/
beach·head
A position on an enemy shoreline captured by troops in advance of an invading force.
A first achievement that opens the way for further developments; a foothold.
scdad07
Calculus – 1st, 2nd or 3rd derivatives…Equation:
US natural gas – US$2,,,/cubic ft domestic;
EU ngas – US$10-12.. /cubic ft imported;
China – US$6../cubic ft on imported gas from C.Asia.
tocharian
Stop the Northern Gateway Pipeline. Stop selling natural resources to State-owned companies. Protect Canadian Land. Protect Nature. The Chinese can get their oil and gas elsewhere.
tocharian
Well, not every Canuck wants to become a CaNOOCk!
Actually China might also want to get technical know-how and expertise from Nexen. Most Canadians have a very naive view about China's global strategic ambitions. The only "foreign country" they know well is the USA and Canadians seem to have a rather silly and childish "love-hate" relationship with their "American Cousins" and there is even a bit of "Schadenfreude" in Canada that the America seems to be in "decline" (compared to China's "rise").. Harper doesn't really like Obama (because of keystone and other things), so he's sucking up to the Chinese, telling Canadians that they need investment from the Chinese Communist Party owned "enterprises" (CCPOE). The tarsands lobby in Alberta agrees of course, since their brains are hard-wired to short-term thinking about making a quick buck. Pondering and deliberating about environmental and other damages to Canada is not part of their psyche. China has money and they want a piece of it by selling off Canada's natural resources. In my opinion, given that Canada has a big landmass with a small population, there should be a national policy for important natural resources (perahps even nationalisation, so SOE's, but the S now stands for Canada!) I blame Wall Street and the greedy corporations for China's "rise". Now China has (i) loads of money, (ii) most of the manufacturing jobs and (iii) reverse-engineered technology (even stealth fighters). What can Canada offer the Chinese? "Bitumen-sands", drilling technology, deep-sea-ports, minerals, timber and even nice real estate for the "rich and famous Chinese" (people well connected to the Communist Party) and what else? oh I forgot foreign aid and seals (Harper even wanted to sell seal meat to the Chinese!)
cate
I thought the keystone pipeline was more about getting Canadian oil to the Gulf of Mexico and on to tankers so it can be sold to anyone – not so much increasing US supply.
It is difficult to see someone address this issue without mentioning the rather significant concerns about environmental integrity that accompany Canadian oil. The Keystone was rejected by the US because it would penetrate the most important aquifer in the US and possibly contaminate huge amounts of water. Frankly – a drive through Alberta to see the damage done by tar sands production convinced me it is insane to continue to mine the bitumin there and convert it into oil – the province is starting to look like a vision of hell. And BC's objections to the western pipeline are also about fears that the magnificent wilderness areas the pipeline would traverse would be destroyed along with the fear of spills at the ocean terminus of the pipeline. Given all of these potential obstacles one has to wonder why the Chinese would take the risk of getting into Canadian oil?
Anonymous
That is a truly horrid idea.