This month marks the 350th anniversary of the West’s first war with China. In February 1662, Generalissimo Zheng Chenggong swept the Dutch off of Taiwan, bringing the island under Chinese rule for the first time in history. The Dutch were Europe’s most dynamic colonial power, and the Taiwan colony was their largest holding in Asia, so the war is fascinating from the perspective of global history, touching on the question of the global balance of power in the pre-modern world.
But the war also has lessons for today, because among the factors that enabled the Chinese to win was a rich, effective, and, to Westerners, mysterious military tradition – a strategic culture that provided a discernable boost to Chinese warcraft. The Dutch, famous in Europe for their weapons, tactics, and logistics, found themselves hopelessly outclassed by the Chinese. Since military leaders in China today are still deeply imbued with this traditional military culture, it behooves us to study it.
Westerners still tend to underestimate Chinese military prowess, viewing China as a historically peaceful nation frequently invaded by bellicose neighbors: Huns, Mongols, Manchus, and, of course, Japanese. During World War II, U.S. and British propaganda strengthened this image by depicting China as a hapless victim of a modernized, assertive, and militarily effective Japan. Most westerners even believe that the Chinese invented gunpowder but never used it in weapons, reserving it for fireworks.
In fact, the first guns were developed in China, as were the first cannons, rockets, grenades, and land mines. The Chinese eagerly studied foreigners’ weapons, such as Japanese muskets and English cannons. So it’s no surprise that on Taiwan, the Dutch found themselves hard pressed by Chinese firepower. The Dutch were no laggards. Dutch cannons and handguns were famous throughout Europe, and the Dutch arms industry was a major part of its booming early-capitalist economy. Yet the guns aimed against them by their Chinese foes were strikingly effective, and the Chinese gunners were so fast and so accurate that, as one Dutch commander wrote in chagrin, “they put our own men to shame.”
Yet an even greater Chinese advantage in this Sino-Dutch War was in the area of leadership. The Dutch were known throughout Europe as the inventors of modern military drill, and, indeed, Dutch innovations revolutionized warfare in Europe. Dutch drilling regimes — in which musketmen were trained to march in lockstep, carry out intricate maneuvers, and act as one coordinated unit — spread throughout the West, prompting military historians to argue that Europeans possessed a special “Western Way of War,” making them the most effective fighting troops in the world.
But, in a striking coincidence of world history, at the same time as Europeans were developing their new drilling regimens, China was undergoing a military revolution of its own. Perhaps one should instead say “revival” of its own, because ancient Chinese armies were incredibly well drilled and disciplined. Still, the revival of the 1500s and 1600s went well beyond ancient models, and Chinese commanders experimented with training regimens that sound strikingly modern – the simulation of combat stress, the assumption of prone positions for firefights (Westerners were trained to stand up, exposing their bodies to more bullets), advanced strength and endurance training regimens.
The Chinese forces the Dutch faced on Taiwan were extremely well-trained, and the Dutch, for all their Western Way of War, were routed on the battlefields like novices.
But the most important Chinese advantage was in strategic and tactical culture. Chinese military commanders were able to draw on two millennia of careful thinking on warfare. Most Westerners know about Sun Tzu’s Art of War, which is read by CEO’s from Germany to California, but most westerners have no idea how many brilliant strategists, tacticians, and logistics experts succeeded Sun Tzu, building the world’s richest corpus of military thought.
Zheng Chenggong and his generals referenced complex scenarios and stratagems by means of a few words, much as westerners use the term “Trojan Horse.” This store of knowledge helped the Chinese to outwit the Dutch at nearly every turn, luring them into traps, making careful use of terrain, combining naval and land power in unexpected and effective ways.
The Dutch, concluding that they had no hope to prevail against the superior Chinese forces, ultimately gave up and handed Taiwan over to the Chinese. The next war between Chinese and Western forces wasn’t fought for another two centuries, and by that time the global balance of power had shifted. Europe was industrializing. China was in decline.
Today, China is modernizing at an incredible clip, and the U.S. appears to be in decline. The technological balance is still in the West’s favor, but the situation is changing fast.
Maybe it’s an awareness of this rapidly-changing status quo that’s motivating Western experts to urge Washington to contain China, and it seems that President Barack Obama is moving in this direction, even as his Republican rivals urge even more ambitious military buildups.
Yet one rarely hears them making a much cheaper and ultimately more effective suggestion: to learn more about traditional Chinese warcraft and military affairs. No nation is so deeply imbued with its own history as China. Commanders in China’s armed forces are as deeply aware of China’s deep legacy of military thought as Zheng Chenggong and his generals were. They know their Sun Tzu, their Zhuge Liang, their Qi Jiguang. But they can also quote Clausewitz and Mahan and Petraeus. They know their own tradition, and they know the Western tradition. They’re following Sun Tzu’s advice: “Know your enemy and know yourself.”
If Westerners don’t study the Chinese military tradition, then the West will be at a significant disadvantage. The Sino-Dutch War, Europe’s First War with China, is a great place to start learning.
Tonio Andrade is a professor of history at Emory University. He is the author of the recent book 'Lost Colony:The Untold Story of China's First Great Victory over The West'.

Jesse Lee
Actually the first acts of war between China and the West was during 1521 ''The Battle of Tamao'' a naval battle between China and Portugal off of it's southern coast.
Stan Ash
The Chinese came to Taiwan with 25,000 soldiers and hundreds of ships. The Dutch East Indies Company had a combined garrison of 2300 men. It was not superior tactics, it was just brute force and overwhelming numbers that gave the Chinese a victory.
HalfEmpty
Yes the Fed and Fluoride!
BTW WTF is going on with Ambrose Bierce thing? And Judge Crater? I mean WTF? Can't you see the link? Stop being sheeple, smell the coffee and buy fish hooks.
Also, Dresden, nao that's war. Not too nuanced, but it changed the minds of many thousands of people. Industrial scale war is us. Call us when you are ready.
slim
Is it ever possible to have a discussion about China that is not swamped by an army of Chinese jingoists, with John Chan (read his World Socialist website to understand his shoddy pedigree) leading the charge?
NYOHON
LOVE AND PEACE HAHAHAHA
got nuts?
so, only yankee jingoism is allowed? stop being a sheep. the fed is your real enemy.
Major Lowen Gil Marquez, Phil Army
The vietnam soldier were vader great in fighting and they have their own tactics to outwit their enemies, they always indicate the dictum of Hold by the belt, guerilla warfare were excellence and they have able to defeat the chinese communist in jungle warfare when the communist invade them somehow in 1979. Like the Philippine Soldier were expert also in jungle warfare and it is proven from the spaniard to japanese invasion of the Philippines which the filipino have able to inflict large casualty to invaders like a flee biting a mad dog, in western philippine sea, the SCARBOORUGH SHOAL which is the territory of the Philippines, if ever the invader will going to disrespect philippine sovereignty then we will hold them by the belt…
aaa
The Chinese people love peace, China must protect themselves
Abbarick
The author clearly wants to draw attention to that First War, and that he has done. He has not denied the nature and outcome of other wars with China. Many comments here seem to suggest that that First War is irrelevant today siting the defeats China had suffered from other subsequent wars. But those comments seem to miss the point about the lessons of that First War which was over Taiwan. China has repeatedly made it clear that there could be no negotiation that would make it give up its sovereignty over Taiwan. We may not be clear how long it took China to prepare for that First War, but when it was ready it won the war decisively. It is still about Taiwan, and the enemy this time is the US, the strongest military power of today just like the Dutch was at the time of that First War.
China never tried to cover up the defeats it had suffered in wars waged against it, they are openly taught in Chinese educational institutions. One will often hear about what the Chinese leaders themselves tagged “Century of Humiliation” which was not about Chinese victories, but shameful defeats. Such history of shameful defeats is taught to Chinese people to build up sense of patriotism in them to be ready to prevent any further humiliation, and to do all to remove the shameful past. The reunification of Hong Kong and Macau were significant milestones in the recovery from the Century of Humiliation, but without the reunification of Taiwan the recovery from the humiliation will never be truly completed. China has made it clear that peaceful reunification is the desired option, but that other options are not off the table. Taiwan is China’s backyard and it can afford luxury of time to wait, watch, contain and prevent just until the “the time is ripe”, as in that First War.
As for the defeats China suffered from neighbours its core strategy is to try to promote good neighbourly relationships with all neighbours. It is also ready to make possible necessary sacrifices, mainly economic sacrifices, to achieve that objective in order to avoid any repeat of humiliation. China message in that First War with the West is the same as today, that is, TAIWAN IS NOT FOR GRABS!
Passerby
It never stops amazing me how these armchair strategists on the Internet have all this time to waste.
a_canadian_observer
@Passerby: Does your comment include John Chan, the self-proclaimed armchair military strategist?
And, BTW, does your comment include yourself?