With the impending entry into service of China's first aircraft carrier, the upgraded Russian Varyag, renamed Shi Lang, one US analyst explains how the Chinese might employ the vessel.
The expert, a respected naval officer whose ideas are widely discussed, spoke on condition of anonymity.
According to the officer, Shi Lang could represent the major vehicle for the second phase of a two-step process for the People's Liberation Army Navy. The process would see the PLAN evolve from its current, mostly coast-bound status to a true ‘blue-water’ force capable of controlling distant waters and influencing events in adjacent lands.
Before Shi Lang could sail into distant regions and launch aircraft to both control the skies and possibly bomb land targets, smaller warships would need to clear the region of enemy warships. In naval terminology, that's called ‘sea control.’ It’s the process of defeating a defending enemy fleet to open up contested waters for follow-on forces.
It’s debatable whether sea control is actually the PLAN’s primary goal. Some navies are designed to be strictly defensive and sail only in their own national waters. Others only operate in undefended waters for mostly peaceful purposes such as disaster relief. Most navies mix these concepts with sea control, to one degree or another. The US Navy, by far the world's largest fleet, aims to excel at all possible tasks.
But the US analyst said recent PLAN construction efforts point toward a growing emphasis on sea control. ‘You have to look at the types of ships they're designing and what the changes are that have occurred in ship design.’
‘Up until 10 years ago, Chinese ships were created without the ability to self-protect or self-project,’ the officer continued. ‘Self-projection’ refers to a ship's ability to carry enough supplies for long-range missions. ‘Now you have an entire generation of DDGs (guided-missile destroyers) they've created that have the ability to go out and enough robust anti-air defenses to operate untied from shore installations.’
As late as the 1990s, the PLAN possessed just one true guided-missile destroyer. Since 2002, Beijing has completed two Type 052Cs that, at 7,000 tons displacement, are just a few thousand tons smaller than the US Navy's Arleigh Burke destroyers, the world's most numerous and capable large surface warships. The Type 052C comes equipped with long-range radars plus around 50 surface-to-air missiles and short-range guns.
Two more Type 052Cs are apparently under construction. By the time they enter service in a few years, the PLAN could have mastered basic tactics for sailing groups of destroyers into contested waters, thanks to China's participation in the international counter-piracy effort off the Somali coast.
‘The great thing about the counter-piracy patrols is they've allowed them to practice working in formations and small groups,’ the officer said. ‘That suggests to me they're getting ready to break loose from their shore tether and go blue-water and do sea-control.’
Coupled with Shi Lang, Chinese refinement of the technology and tactics of destroyer-warfare ‘tells me they're looking beyond sea control and looking at the potential for power projection,’ the analyst added.

Kazuaki Shimazaki
While they are at it, they better work on their antisubmarine warfare skills. Chinese destroyers and frigates are armed with increasingly improved SAMs and antiship missiles, but on sonars they are still armed with “self-defense” sonars and still don’t have so much as a low-frequency sonar or TACTASS (supposedly such things were developed but not installed for cost reasons on the Lanzhous, but the frigates don’t have them either).
That suggests their antisubmarine warfare proficiency and capability is still very poor. They might learn to defend from the Air but unless they learn to defend against subs they are very liable to be sunk.
Observer
@ John Chan – you said **************”……Frank and I did not blame David Axe for writing an unbiased article, it proves that we are always truthful and objective, we are simply calling a spade a spade….”***********
Are you kidding us? You and Frank are always truthful and objective? Tell you what, if we could cite the comments that you two and your commrades made in the last few months to show you guys are anything but truthful and objective, would you two and your commrades leave this place forever?
How about that, Chinese bloggers, put up or shut up. Your choice.
Frank
Yes. It will take a few more years for China to build blue water navy. However, all warships are made in China. That cannot be said about India. There is no doubt that Chinese navy is far advanced than India’s. Even the India Telemarketer (IT) call center Johnny cannot deny it.
Call center Johnny can deny that he is an Indian. However, he cannot hide his mind, accent, and many other features that cannot be discussed here.
Johnny
@Frank You are mentally ill. See a shrink.
Dasrath
@Frank I suggest an very simple solution. User named Frank shall prove to us that he is from China. He shall post his -
1- Full street address complete with all little details.
2- Post his phone number in China and shall call us from that number to prove he has that phone in possession.
3- Shall send an copy of his ID card in China, ID must show his address given above and bills that are paid on that address.
4- An certificate from family commission in China so as to prove he really has an Chinese heritage.
If he can do all these then we shall consider his claims about origin of other people. If he does not he should shut the f** up.
John Chan
@Dasrath, are you proposing censorship here? The anti-China bloggers like Johnny, Tango, Liberty N, Reasons, and Co. slander China with distorting facts, twisting truth and fabricating events without hesitation. Chinese bloggers rebuffing those anti-China smearing propagandas with strong words is reasonable; your outrage response is puzzling. Your f** is the first on this site, all heated arguments between the bloggers have never degraded to such uncivilized and uneducated behaviour and language. I hope you can refrained yourself from using socially unacceptable language, because there are kids around reading the comments here,
A technique that you can use to participate blogging here properly, you should withhold your anger charged comments a day or two, and then rewrite it. It is way more effective to present convincing argument to sway other readers instead of dishing out low level social lingo to show your frustration over other bloggers’ superior arguments.
Johnny
@Dasrath One shouldn’t throw insults at others as it brings him to their level.
Other than that, I agree with you! If @Frank can prove that he is from China by following above steps I am more than willing to give irrefutable proof of my Korean residence. So go ahead @Frank and prove to us first where you are from before questioning others!
John Chan
US navy grew in two phases, phase one was to enforce Monroe Doctrine, and phase two was to project power around the globe.
China navy is still in the first phase, it is building up strength to enforce China’s Monroe/Yin Zhuo Doctrine from East China Sea to South China Sea, and then it will move to the second phase of power projection. If China navy can complete the first phase by 2025, then it surely establishes a new record by beating the US the time it needed to complete Monroe Doctrine.
Johnny
@Chan Your understanding of Monroe Doctrine is flawed. Monroe doctrine was not just an policy or accumulation of hardware but rather an culmination of various geo-political changes NOT just USA military. Monroe doctrine was discussed in an earlier thread and it is disappointing you didn’t retain any of that.
John Chan
@Johnny, the spirit of Monroe Doctrine is that America is off limit, i.e. America is USA’s backyard, the writing on the Monroe Doctrine sign board is “Beware, get near at your own risk!” What you said was the implementation and expansion of Monroe Doctrine’s spirit, then without lethal tools Monroe Doctrine became a toothless paper tiger, a laughingstock or can’t walk the talk joke.
Frank
I am wondering if Indian Tele-marketer (IT) or simply call-center Johnny will read this article or not. He and some Indians think Chinese warships cannot produce fresh water.
Yes. It is true that Chinese navy was backward 10 years ago. Now China is a very different country.
However, I agree with Yangzhi that China’s resurrection is not a threat to the west. West is China’s best customer and borrower. Chinese are business minded people. They will NEVER attack their best customers and borrowers.
Johnny
@Frank I am from S.Korea you dumbass.
And no, Chinese navy is still several years away from Blue water capability. Read Article Before Posting.
Johnny
Also, Why aren’t you blaming David Axe for writing inaccurate article now? You and Chan keep calling this site and its writers ‘Anti-China’. What happened now?
Truth is David Axe is an unbiased writer. Being Unbiased and Truthful is something that hurts CPC most. I agree with him whether he writes anti-china, pro-china but you guys cry foul the moment tables are turned.
John Chan
@Johnny, Chinese bloggers support unbiased articles regardless the author. Chinese bloggers also expose lies told on China, clear smear painted on China and correct distorted facts about China when they encounter those materials in any article regardless the author too.
CPC and China have problems that need to be addressed, but China cannot be demonized at any cause; any party tries to exploit the problems existed in China for its benefits will be met with resistance and counter-action. This principle is not only unique to China; it also applies to all nations large and small. It is call principle of non-interference.
As you said Frank and I did not blame David Axe for writing an unbiased article, it proves that we are always truthful and objective, we are simply calling a spade a spade.
Johnny
@Chan So only those article who praise China are Unbiased? Wow! You guys must love Xinhua!
John Chan
@Johnny, Chinese bloggers support unbiased articles regardless the author. Chinese bloggers also expose lies told on China, clear smear painted on China and correct distorted facts about China when they encounter those materials in any article regardless the author too.
Johnny
@Chan Oh really, If Chinese bloggers are so ‘unbiased and accurate’ then why you guys never listen to other side iof arguments or listen to anyone else for that matter?
Do you think your claim on Vietnams shore was ‘accurate’?
Or your comment about ‘Integration of Australis in China’?
Or every single post of Liang1a whose comments are regularly laughed at as wildly inaccurate by everyone?
Of Frank whose racist attitude is known to everyone and who uses racial stereotypes in his comments on a regular basis. You dont need to go far, just look on this page!
Who is giving China an bad image? People who point out its flaws or people who post wrong history, unrealistic claims or racial comments. Who exactly do you think is hurt when you call people of Taiwan Hideous or Indians Tail wigglers or Vietnamese Liars,Thieves? No one but China’s image. Do me a favor and reflect on what I said for a minute.
John Chan
@Johnny, you are not being objective, and insisting that the lies told on China, smear painted on China and distorted facts described about China from anti-China group are China’s own fault, it is akin to blame the victim.
The anti-China group created the bad image for China is to undermine China’s effort to rise peacefully. China’s rise will continue despite anti-China clique’s misgiving; the people get hurt are the innocent people in the world who are forced into a situation that they are not aware of, due to the misleading and toxic anti-China rhetoric are continuously being pumped out by the anti-China clique.
Canada is a successful example of deep integration of a smaller power to a stronger power. It is the correct route for all nations around China to adopt for the peace and prosperity of the Asia. Anti-China clique are the merchants of instability and misery. Anti-China clique is the frog trying to stop an asphalt roller because of its self opinionated attitude.
Johnny
@Chan Steamroller? Ofcourse! And you think it is others who portray China as hostile!
Frank
Give me a break Johnny.
I know you are ashamed to be an East Indian. However, you are nothing closer to a Korean. Your logic is very Indian, nothing close to a Korean. Every time, there is an India comment, you jump right in.
Answer two simply questions. How many Chinese characters does your capital’s name have? What do those characters mean?
Indian is an Indian. You cannot hide it. The more you hide, the more shame you will bring to your race.
Johnny
@Frank You are definitely an deranged person. I can deduce that something terrible happened with you in India.
I am an proud S.korean and I need no certificate from a troll. If we start acting like you then why not call you an Pakistani? or EAM an American or Chan an N.Korean?
Stop throwing your sick tantrum on us, Troll. And go see a psychiatrist.
yang zi
actually, the more accurate description is, China is mimicking what ever US does. so power projection or sea control, China want to learn to do all of them.
The trick is, China needs to progress slowly to delay the confrontation with other navies as farther as possible. Only when you have overwhelming advantage, you go to war.
This doesn’t mean China will be aggressive. I believe China’s goal is to secure free trade and free access to resources. This is the same goal of the West. Chinese has profound respect to Western civilization, it will not be an enemy of the West
Leon O
Unfortunately, the other Asia-Pacific nations don’t share your confidence in China’s benevolent intent.
Johnny
@Leon I agree. Nobody believes in Chinese crap about their intents, except Chinese! World believes in action not in empty CPC propaganda. If you talk about peace with Vietnam, sign an agreement but try to grab its land two years later then you are a backstabber.
China’s support to dictatorship in Pyongyang is aimed at destroying the peace in asia and this may lead to third world war. If China wants peace then why the hell is it supporting N.Ks nuke program? Typical Hypocrisy which is an hallmark of China.
Anonymous
Then why does USA support europe’s nukes and Israel’s nuclear ambitions
John Chan
@Johnny, I thought you despise “derailing discussions with their flaming and racism.” How can you are doing exactly what you despise? Maybe Frank has a point.
ken
China have no choice to support north korea, but at the mean time they do not want north korea to have nuclear. reason behind this is farely simple. if north korean goes down and merge with south korea, you have the US army base right next to chinas border. do you think the USA will allow chinese army base in canada or mexico???
another major concern on north korea, if they goes down, you have millions of poor people from north korea swarm into china which will makes a huge impact on chinese economies.
even a 6th grader in china knows the concept of this.
guest
>China is mimicking what ever US does
This is surely true but if you look at the broader PLAN acquisition programs, it clearly sea control heavy and power projection light.
http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2011-05/twilight-uperfluous-carrier
JD
Chinese are smart.They don’t need to reinvent the wheel when they can easily steel it from the free world(USA and Europe) and not so free world(USSR)
Frank
West steals paper, silk, porcelain, compass, and gun powder making technology from China also.
Get used to it. Learn from each other is the best way for human race to move forward.
The most adapted survives. Chinese are the most adapted people on earth.
Ly Tran Le Nguyen
That’s right!
- China adapts by annihilate all the little guys in the region and then turn around pretended to be a victim.
- China adapts by sending a million troops into North Korea to attack American troops, whom just less than 10 years before helped saved China from Japan.
- China adapts by invading Tibet, subdued Tibetan culture, steal their lands and called it their ‘historical’ province.
- China adapts by blatantly muscled their way into the Paracell and Spratly Island chains despite the fact that they never owned it in the first place.
- China adapts by trying to ‘teach the Vietnamese a lesson’ in 1979 only to get slapped around by a bunch of Vietnamese women militia and had to run back to the other side of the border with tail between their legs.
Ric
Here an interesting question:
How much of US Navy or military was funded by China’s purchases of American debt ?
China is No#1 among many other foreign nations that have ” lend ” money to USA so this country can live a certain lifestyle and have nice shiny toys ( Military spending)
Tango
Just forget about this opt-cited myth!! China was just the biggest FOREIGN creditor and manipulator (!!) with only 7.5% of the US national debt! The biggest creditor of the US Gov’t debt is THE AMERICAN INDIVIDUALS & INSTITUTIONS with over 62% of the US national debt. Think twice before uttering nonsense!
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67810/joseph-gagnon-and-gary-hufbauer/taxing-chinas-assets
After bin Laden’s gone for good, China is the biggest threat to the world’s peace, stability and prosperity, that needs to be taken care of!!
jon
“Be taken care of” by who and why?
They threaten some people, but so does the us. They support dictatorships, so does the us. Imperialism is Imperialism, doesn’t matter who does it. It’s only recently that they haven’t been top dog.
Right now they can move very far, but if anyone goes knocking on chinas door, get ready for some next level type cluster f&*k to go down.
Johnny
@Ric You have been mislead. Actually China has 7% of US debt while Japan has 6%.
And as for the amount held by China, I would encourage you to read about economic hostory, an phenomenon called Nixon Shock. Stage is all set for an jolt.