An overwhelming majority of U.S. citizens want deep and immediate cuts in military spending, according to a new poll. The Center for Public Integrity, a Washington, D.C.-based investigative news service, in conjunction with two other groups asked more than 600 Americans from across the country about their perceptions regarding U.S. defense spending. The survey went on to ask whether the respondent favored increasing, holding steady or decreasing military spending.
Seventy-six percent of survey-takers, including 90 percent of Democrats and 67 percent of Republicans, say they would cut the Pentagon's budget. That places the majority of respondents at odds with Democratic President Barack Obama's policies and the proposed budgets of the majority Republican Party in Congress. Obama has essentially held defense spending steady at around $550 billion by cutting its recent rate of increase. The Republicans have proposed adding billions of dollars to the president's budget.
War costs – currently totaling around $100 billion a year – are budgeted separately from the military’s “base” budget.
The popular position, if reflected in actual spending, would jeopardize military initiatives that enjoy broad support among elected leaders in both political parties, including: the Pentagon's aerial and naval “pivot” towards the Pacific; the deployment of sea- and land-based missile defenses; and the development of new war technology including new stealth bombers and fighters, drone aircraft, submarines and aircraft carriers.
But events could bring budgetary reality in line with the poll respondents’ desires. Last year, Congress passed, and the president signed, the Budget Control Act, which requires $1.2 trillion in budget cuts over the coming decade. If Congress and the president don’t agree on what programs to cut, the reductions will occur automatically across all federal agencies. That could slice hundreds of billions of dollars from the Pentagon’s future budgets.

JD
As a military member I can agree that there should be budget cuts in military spending as well. The problem is, these cuts are coming out of the main armed forces that actually do all the deploying along with their equipment, medical, paychecks, etc. Enlisted members are losing their jobs at an alarming rate, many of which are coming up on retirement. Deployments are being made longer with less time between them. Obama may have curved the budget a little bit, but it’s come at the cost of military moral, families, and basic living conditions. To just say that we need to cut military budgets across the board is easy to say when you haven’t experienced life from the other side.
You can talk polotics all you want, but where is the real problem? America elects their own officials. When is it time to take drastic measures on America’s leadership? Was any of their paychecks cut or excess spending habits curbed? Maybe a little. So when do we quit bailing out companies that bankrupt themselves, paying people a liveable sum to live comfortably without having a job that are perfectly healthy and capable of holding a job, or even creating more money out of thin air to pay the governments bills? Why is that not part of the discussion?
It’s not Republican or Democrat in my humble opinion. They all seem to want what’s best for themselves, which is natural. But shouldn’t our leadership want what’s best for their people more than themselves? We as Americans, I think, are so blinded by what we don’t have, that we aren’t happy with what we do have. We live damn comfortably and I’m pretty sure we could all live without the newest Ipad, flatscreen or 22′s on our rides. Our politicians aren’t going to fix America, the people are going to have to step up. No more placing blame on someone else. No more, “the man’s keeping me down.” Everyone has their answer for why our situation is so screwed up. No one has stopped to take a look at their own life/situation. Time to suck it up and do some work.
You can cut out the military and send us all home, but eventually someone is going to have to defend this country when evil people do try to attack us. Where will we be then? Are we even going to be able to purchase firearms 10 years down the road to defend our own homes when that does actually happen? It seems harder and harder to get those every year.
Ok, now I’m just tired and ranting, but hopefully someone gets my point a little. If it sounds cliche and overly patriotic, forgive me for my opinion. You are entitled to yours as well though. Now I have to go to watch, and i haven’t slept in about 40 hours:)
Good night to all!!
steveofoz
The thing about military spending is that most of the money goes to private corporations. The US has an awesome military, but it gets appalling value for its money, because it spends insane amounts of money to achieve it.
It has been alleged that many of the private corporations pay more to lobbyists than they pay in taxes. You don’t need to be Einstein to work out what results in.
Maybe some outside competition would help. (It is bizarre that the US has to learn about competition and free markets though)
Orbital
Need a 100% cut of Department of Education, 90% cut of EPA, 100% de-funding of Obamacare first, before we start making the needed defense cuts.
Start by cutting out the welfare, that’s not what the government of the United States is for.
HillyBillyBob
>OrbitalMay 16, 2012 at 2:26 am
>Need a 100% cut of Department of Education, 90% cut of EPA, 100% de-funding of >Obamacare first, before we start making the needed defense cuts.
>
>Start by cutting out the welfare, that’s not what the government of the United >States is for.
Yeah! We can make sure our children are 100% pure uneducated dull-wits suffering from cancer by companies dumping benzene, Hexavalent chromium and other nasties into our water table. On the plus-side we can use those hopeless, impoverished rable as cannon fodder for our next war.
Simon Dalzell
600 people?! Now let’s think about this. I’m all for military spending, but you can’t base the opinion of a nation with more than 300,000,000 people in it off of 600 people. Not to say I don’t think military spending should be reduced: I do.
Simon Dalzell
Meant to say I’m all for CUTTING military spending. Sigh. Won’t let me edit my previous comment…
cate
If it is up to the Pentagon – there will be no war with Iran,the Chiefs of Staff have been testifying before Congress about the foolishness of such an attack. Seems to me the warmongers are AIPAC and various “pundits” who write columns in US newspapers.
As for cuts – of course most Americans support cuts. Our military is huge and reductions in force will not hurt us – the President has already proposed such reductions and there has been no huge outcry. Certainly it is time for the US to remove it’s forces from Europe – that alone would save billions. The Europeans are surely capable of taking care of their own defense.
The “pivot” to the Pacific is not endangered by such cuts – the pivot is a diplomatic and trade endeavor – not solely reliant on the size of the military and at any rate – even a somewhat reduced US military is larger than all of the other nations military.
And a reminder – US debt is owed to US citizens. Only 7.5% of the debt is owed to China. So take a deep breath and resist assertions that the sky is falling.
MaddyDee
Thanks for that post, cate.
Donatella
From now on, all military budget money should come directly out of the salaries of all Democrat and Republican members of the House, Senate and White House.
And their kids or themselves should be the first to go if there is a ‘need’ for a war. After all, if it’s important, and they vote for it, they should be first on the front lines.
Talon
When our country fails due to massive debt, it will be our military spending which caused it… What a joke, neither republicans or democrats will ever discuss a sane budget for the military… they keep robbing taxpayers to hand over billion dollar contracts to their military industrial owners. Ironic whats called Our ‘defense’ is the cancer destroying this country