Despite being the world’s biggest, and second richest, military force, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is struggling to cope. So argue Andrew Scobell and Andrew J. Nathan in a recent paper entitled “China’s Military Overstretch,” which proposes that the PLA “remains overstretched as it seeks to address the wide range of missions it is called upon to perform.”
The authors outline the many tasks, both new and old, that the modern PLA has to worry about: internal security, national defense against an unusually large number of neighboring states, Taiwan, and more generally, the goal of expanding China’s strategic interests across the globe – plus a lot more besides.
Clearly, the PLA has plenty of contingencies that it needs to plan for, and to train for. However, there’s a big difference between being busy, and being overstretched. And it seems far more likely that the Chinese military is on top of most things, most of the time.
At the upper level of the military hierarchy, the PLA is no doubt a very busy army indeed. In 2011, it opened a new Strategic Planning Department in recognition of the fact that the PLA’s existing management organs weren’t coping with the complex strategic landscape that the organization now faced. Territorial disputes here and there must also be taking up a lot of military brainpower, if not actual manpower.
Yet overstretch is the result of actually doing too much, not of potentially having to do too much. Consider what the PLA actually does operationally, compared with other militaries that are often said to be overstretched, and it becomes difficult to see the PLA as one of the world’s more hard-pressed armed forces.
Ask the U.S. military or the British Army, for example, about overstretch: they have experienced a decade of warfare, thousands of casualties, multiple tours, global deployments, and now tumbling budget allocations. The U.S. military, on the side, also has a global empire to manage. The South African military is an even more extreme example of what overstretch really means. It is reportedly on the verge of collapse, because too few soldiers with too little funding and not enough experience are being asked to perform far too many missions.
Of course, it does not follow that the PLA can’t be overstretched, simply because militaries elsewhere are under even greater strain. But operationally, the PLA still spends a lot of time practicing, and very little time actually doing. A tiny fraction of China’s total personnel is committed to peacekeeping operations. Occasionally the PLA has to intervene in domestic crises in Tibet or Xinjiang, but not terribly often. The PLA Navy’s workload has doubtless increased amidst the recent territorial disputes in the East China Sea and the South China Sea, but the military’s operational involvement in those episodes has been fairly limited.
Above all, if the PLA really is overstretched, then something must have gone badly awry in its modernization master plan. Overstretch during peace time can only – as in South Africa – be the result of disastrous mismanagement. But Beijing knows what it’s doing. China’s military is in the middle of a long-term and carefully controlled modernization program, which has involved steady downsizing over many years, as well as a significant and equally steady increase in funds. Recruitment has never been a problem; money has never been a problem. So why should the force be stretched? Similarly, it is hard to think of any surprising events – there haven’t been any wars, for example – that could have upset the Central Military Commission’s planning, and opened up unforeseen gaps in the PLA’s operational capacity.
If the PLA suddenly had to deal with all the contingencies that Scobell and Nathan describe, then it certainly would be overstretched. But right now the PLA isn’t invading Taiwan, or fighting a war in Korea, or repelling invasions along its long borders, or quelling a mass insurrection in the far west. It is instead engaged in a comprehensive modernization drive, along very predictable lines, with ample funds, a huge headcount, and with few operational demands to distract it. In fact, one of the PLA’s main challenges is its lack of operational experience – in other words, understretch.

Dazza
uh how can they be worn out when they have not actually fought any wars?
James
It is surprising to me that there is little mention made in discussions of the PLA about the impact China's long one-child policy might have on its war-fighting capabilities. It goes without saying that the bulk of the PLA's officer and non-commissioned officer corps consist of only children. The same is likely to apply to a large segment of its rank and filers. Large numbers of casualties among its elite families' only sons could be very destablizing politically. I wonder if the political powers that be would undertake a large-scale war – say against Taiwan – knowing that many of their own only children would certainly among the casualties.
jethromayham
Populous nation needs a big army. To confront invaders they need modernization. So without precautions they will be spending more for the military than for infrastructure to employ more people. I doubt China will be aggressive unless it is push from shove near its borders.
russell lee
China soon will rule the world.
dean
i dont believe a word of truth here i wouldnt want to go to war against china they are the most powerfull in my mind and they are not overstretched they are to smart and they just want the world to think things like this china is a sinister country and cant be trusted they are powerfull and are just sitting back and waiting for some country to mess with them and then you will see the power they have dont believe anything you here about them being week or 'overstreched' its b.s
jethromayham
China has no intention of being the aggressive one because their policy is to defend their own territiory just like most other countrys would do. Just leave the alone. The US should preactice the same policy and there are signs they are doing it because another 10 year war isn't going to sit well with the American people.
tc
If China is no threat, then why are they engaged in cyber-war. Everyday our systems are being hit by the chinese.
angelo j aguilar
i woul like to mention that when china did mobilize major outcomes were gained…globally…tibet, which proved that a mass settlement will displace and korea, masses are hard to fight…icbm does not make sense to anyone who is about resettlement or an economy…china will have to develope militarily to secure intrests in africa and south america…free market enterprise or a military presence went out with the cold war..the us is now having to come to terms with illeagal immigration not much different in that it is advatagous to a political party to support a potential voter base. the china stategy is transporting and funding settlement abroad…are we not seeing a pattern here?
smoothn00dle
"Andrew Scobell and Andrew J. Nathan" essay's real name is "How to cause China trouble and worn out it military/economy/…../….?"
BTW, this is aweseome. China military, all it do is practice and gaining strenght day by day and yet the psy impact to Japan and US are immerse.
Experience?! How hard to press a buttom to launch an ICBM? May be I am over simplify a bit but modern warfare are all most win by "design"!