There is little question that the tragic killing of six Sikh worshippers at a Gurudwara in a Milwaukee suburb on Sunday was a depraved and reprehensible act. It also underscored the toxic brew produced by combining the United States’ lax gun control laws with the resurgence of racist ideology.
That being said, the official reaction of the Government of India to this horrific incident reeks of hypocrisy. The outrage expressed by the Indian National Congress, the principal component of the current ruling coalition, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) is entirely insincere given that it has done little or nothing to bring the perpetrators of the 1984 pogrom against the Sikh population of New Delhi to justice. In this tragedy it should be emphasized that as many as 800 Sikhs were systematically slaughtered in the streets of the nation's capital.
The attacks took place in the wake of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s assassination by two of her Sikh bodyguards in 1984. The bodyguards were motivated by her decision to send Indian troops into the Golden temple in Amritsar, the holiest of Sikh shrines, after Sikh separatists had seized it. To ostensibly avenge her death, a host of street thugs, many of whom are believed to have been associated with the Congress Party, went on a rampage across much of the city attacking Sikh neighborhoods and killing many of those they came across.
As a number of independent assessments have shown, the city's police during this incident were merely bystanders to the carnage at best and tacit collaborators at worst. Today, even after no less than ten government-appointed commissions of inquiry, only a few insignificant persons have been convicted for their role in what could be described as India's first pogrom. Indeed, as Human Rights Watch put it in a 2011 report, “The [Indian] government has yet to prosecute those responsible for the mass killings of Sikhs that followed the 1984 assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards.”
With its track record of being either unable or unwilling to prosecute the key individuals who organized and directed the grotesque events, the Congress Party’s denouncements of the U.S. government ring hollow. Had Wade Michael Page, the individual accused of the heinous crime in Wisconsin on Sunday, not been fatally wounded by police after Wade had shot the first officer to arrive on the scene 8 or 9 times as the officer sought to care for the wounded, rest assure U.S. Law would have certainly followed its course. Page would have faced the full weight of a fair trial and would have, in all likelihood, paid dearly for carrying out this cruel and wanton act.
Publicly upbraiding the United States for allowing individuals to have easy access to firearms and for the racist proclivities of an individual may well generate enthusiastic press coverage and electoral support for India’s politicians. However, it cannot wash away the stain from India's own flawed record in its abject failure to bring the guilty to justice for the terror that they had unleashed upon a segment of their hapless, innocent citizenry in the closing months of 1984.

Arvin Valmuci
Sikhs in USA Seek Apology and Arrest of Indian Officials After Delhi Flag Burning
Petition: https://www.change.org/petitions/usa-sikhs-aren-t-india-s-property-india-must-apologize-for-burning-american-flag
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/USA-Sikhs-Arent-Indias-Property-Hands-OFF-Our-Flag/120889724724349
SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 10, 2012 – Sikh-American community leaders on Friday demanded an apology from India after political activists in New Delhi burned American flags to protest the Oak Creek Wisconsin Sikh Gurdwara murders.
“India and its puppet government in Punjab must issue an immediate apology to Sikh-Americans for burning our flag,” said Bhajan Singh Bhinder, Director of US-based Sikh Information Centre. “We are not India’s property. They should get their hands off our flag.”
On August 6, members of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), a political party aligned with Hindu fundamentalist Bharatiya Janata Party, burned several flags and displayed signs reading: “US Govt Take Action Against The Killers.”
The same day, Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal of Punjab, which has the largest Sikh population, wrote in a letter to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh: “The government of India must get more actively and vigorously involved in getting the U.S. administration to address the issue in right earnest.” Foreign Minister S. M. Krishna also blamed America, saying: "The U.S. government will have to take a comprehensive look at this kind of tendency which certainly is not going to bring credit to the United States of America."
Bhinder asked: “Why is Badal outraged over the murder of six Sikhs in the USA when he just appointed Sumedh Saini, an architect of Sikh genocide, as Punjab’s top police official? Saini is Badal’s Butcher who built his career by killing thousands of Sikhs. India rewards and promotes police officers who use torture and murder prisoners. That’s why Badal made Saini into Punjab’s Director General of Police.”
Bhinder also cited Union Cabinet Member Kamal Nath as an instigator of similar crimes. Nath has been accused of provoking mob violence during the 1984 Delhi Pogrom. Several Congress Party Members of Parliament, Nath among them, sparked the bloody riots. Journalist Sanjay Suri reported witnessing Nath order a mob of 4,000 people that burned several Sikhs alive when they attacked and destroyed Gurudwara Rakab Ganj in New Delhi.
Bhinder stated the intent of the flag-burning was clearly intended to create strife among different American communities and provoke American anger against U.S. Sikhs. “This has the hallmarks of a staged event. The rabble-rousing Indian government is trying to pit one American against another to divide the USA along caste lines in the tradition of the Brahmin rulers of India,” he said. “Sikhs fled tyranny in Punjab for freedom in the USA. India can do nothing to end anti-Sikh violence in America as long as it continues the officially sanctioned genocide of Sikhs in India.”
A 2011 report by human rights watchdog Organization for Minorities of India (OFMI) stated that torture is used regularly in every police station in India. Backing Bhinder’s claim that police brutality leads to promotion, OFMI spokesman Arvin Valmuci said, “Look at former police officer Mohammad Izhar Alam, who led the ‘Black Cats’ death squad to exterminate Sikhs. Last November, 34 young Sikhs killed by Alam were finally identified, but in October, Badal promised him a constituency in Punjab Legislative Assembly.”
Valmuci says India has a long, indisputable record of staging violence against minorities. He also questioned the spontaneity of the flag-burning, asking, “Was it staged by the Indian government like other crimes such as the 2001 Chittisinghpura Massacre, the 2007 Samjhauta Express bombing, and the 1982 Cow Head Incident?”
The Sikh Information Centre was joined by OFMI in making three demands of India:
“If India truly has sympathy for the memories of Wisconsin Sikhs Satwant Singh Kaleka, Prakash Singh, Sita Singh, Ranjit Singh, Suveg Singh, and Paramjit Kaur, then it will listen to us. We demand:
“1) An immediate investigation of the mysterious thugs who burned the American flag in New Delhi;
“2) An immediate apology by India and its puppet government in Punjab to the USA's Sikh community;
“3) Immediate prosecution of Kamal Nath and of Badal's Butcher, Sumedh Saini, for crimes against the Sikhs involving the torture and murder of thousands.
“We also humbly request:
“1) The Obama Administration take swift action to investigate attempts to use the mischievous flag-burning incident to create more civil strife in the USA;
“2) The U.S. State Department demand an official apology by India to the Sikh-American community;
“3) The U.S. Congress take up and press this issue and particularly seek prosecution of Kamal Nath and Sumedh Saini.”
About SIC: The Sikh Information Centre is a USA-based non-profit committed to the discovery, dissemination and elevation of crucial information relating to the liberty of unhindered exercise of all intrinsic rights of humanity.
anonymous
It's incredible how you can't criticize India without all sorts of Indians appearing from thin air and making obnoxious comments.
NeverForget1984
Sikh Genocide In India:: http://www.sikhfreedom.com/suba.html
Kay
Well the Point is India still has a terrible human rights record. This year in March while sitting down peacefully protesting Jaspal Singh and Ranjit Singh were shot dead by Indian Government police no one has been charged the killer was moved to another post in another region this story only came out because western reporters were at the scene at the time. India is still continuing in its Human rights Violations today this isn't something they have learnt from appoligised for and are making a change they are still corrupt and a unlawful Government US learns and changes India has not and will not India is pointing fingers when it still is a rogue state that doesn't follow human rights. Read up on what Amnesty say of India who are also banned from India.
Jay
yet another excellent point brought up about how the govt in india is corrupt.
Aanchal Anand
So by these standards, the US should not criticize Iran if it nukes Israel…because the US nuked Japan. I hope you realize how ridiculous the logic presented in the article sounds!
nalright
Wow.. so much hatred emanating from India. After reading comments like these and on myriad other articles pertaining to the Indian government and populace, I'm glad I don't live there, and frankly, do not want to visit any time soon.
burneylol
I think I will now write an article, "Why US shouldn't criticize modern day slavery, racism, and genocide" based on this same logic.
SonicTheHedgehog
A good point, but a little off the mark, considering the scope and nature of the killings. One is a highly political and ongoing struggle within an incredibly multicultural and diverse nation, where 3 major religions co-exist. Yes there are clashes due to extremism and should be curbed, but it is reprehensible to compare that to a cold-blooded massacre motivated by ignorance and hate.
Publius
yes, adding to the article, the tremendous difference in how the governments of the us and india have reacted to contemporary events is clear. For all its faults, the state and federal government and esepcially law enforcement across the country have shown solidarity with the sikhs.
http://jasjitsdhanoa.blogspot.com/2012/08/why-india-has-no-right-to-express.html?spref=fb
Truthsayer
It is not just the Sikhs getting killed ,look at the batman movie incident ,It easy even for psychopathic killers to get guns in the US and The Diplomat says ,US shouldn't be blamed? Diplomat expects India to be a slave of the US ,accepting everything it does without any questions ,for example it OK for the US to go against it's own principles and overthrow a democratically elected govt in Iran but it is not OK for India maintain bilateral ties with Iran.
Just because such a thing happened in India over 30 years ago doesn't mean India doesn't have any say at all
LOOK AT THE HYPOCRASY IN THE USA ,THEY OVERTHROW DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVT IN IRAN AND OPPOSE THE SAME IN CHILE ,INTERFERE IN THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF many OTHER COUNTRIES ,
The US critizes the situation in syria as if it cares for the people of syria and then provides arms to kill people in baharain .
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/240743.html
Mr. Singh
Thankx a million from england sumit for choosing the truth and having the gut to publish. Carry on sheera…
Shree
"Sumit Ganguly is the Rabindranath Tagore Chair in Indian Cultures and Civilizations and a Professor of Political Science at Indiana University, Bloomington. Ganguly is the author, co-author, editor or co-editor of twenty books on South Asia and serves on the editorial boards of Asian Affairs, Asian Survey and Current History among others."
The author is well qualified to write whatever he wants but I can't understand why India loses its right to protest against inhuman acts because of 1984 riots.
I agree that was a dark period for India..but Indira Gandhi refused to remove the Sikh bodyguards because she was fighting terrorists which the two idiots didnt understand.
The author fails to acknowledge what we have achieved since then … India is mature enough to elect a Sikh Prime Minister even after a former PM was assassinated by two sikhs and that without much fuss like Obama election generated.
Sikh soldiers contribute in large numbers in our Armed Forces and we are proud of them,hell Bikram Singh is current Army Chief .
India is the largest victim of Islamic terror but we were able to distinguish between the good and bad elements of it … Indian muslims even became the President and Chief Justice if India many many years before.
India is unique so will be its problems and Indians have done well to solve them but there is a long road ahead.
Ladi
My friend, I know Sikh is current prime minister but look at the past and find out why is he prime minister. He's being used for his skills that is about it. A person who would go to UN and say no Sikhs are being killed and were killed during massacre in Delhi–back in 1992– is what you say is a Sikh leader. Indian politics is using him because he got beard and turban on; he is not a Sikhs. He's using article of Sikh faith for personal benefit like most politicians.
Shree
I wont waste my time replying to idiots like you.
Vicky
If this attack would have happened in india, guess what : POLICE WOULD HAVE BEEN A MUTE SPECTATOR AND THEY WOULD HAVE ESCORTED THE SHOOTER SAFELY TO HIS HOME. After that any one who would have demanded justice would have been tortured badly by police and ultimately would have been shot dead branding him as a terrorists. ( The unfamous JASWANT SINGH KHALRA CASE ).
Very well written article about great indian democracy. hats off ! makes me feel really happy happy that at-least some people still have traces of humanity and concsience. God Bless u Mr. Ganguly.
Ladi
Very well said Sir!!
Jake
An act of violence on this level SHOULD be frowned upon, one can't use examples that have happened in the past as a reason to not criticise when something like this happens. If that was the case no large Countries would be able to say anything about another country. Almost all nations have dark elements to their distant and recent history.
Jagraj Singh
I do agree with the sentiments of the writer, the Indian GOvernment and the Akali dal are hypocrites who do not see the three fingers pointing back at them as they point one finger at the US. That being said, there are a number of inaccuracies in the Article about the numbers killed in 1984 and the reasons behind that. Either the writer has done this because of the impact of the state proganda machine upon him too, propoganda which has seriously underestimated the up to 5000 people who died in Delhi alone and seriously exaggerated the "sikh separatist terrorist" line in order to undermine the legitimate political, economic and human rights movement of the punjab populace. I hope this is the case…or else the writer may well be wilfully giving with one hand and yet working to support the official propoganda about 1984 with the other.
raji
very well said! I couldn’t agree more!!
Mazo
The word "pogrom" means "riot" in Russian and that is what happened against the Sikhs. Let us remember that an Indian Prime Minister was assasinated by religious terrorists. To claim that this was an offically sponsored genocide is plain misinformation given the fact that these were spontaneous riots, just like during the Partitioning of India and Pakistan. Where is the "investigation" into that "genocide" and when was Lord Mountbatten prosecuted for his "complicity" in those crimes ??
These kind of ex-post facto analysis always come heavily laden with personal biases and narratives that do not do justice to the "actual ground realiy" of the time. Just like how the Congress Party has politically motivated reasons to charge Narendra Modi for the riots post Godhra, the BJP and the Sikh religious right have a vested interest in perpetuating the myth of an "officially sanctioned" genocide ala Kristallnatch where the German SA and SS actively participated under "orders". In Delhi even 10 years after the riots, not a single shred of evidence of official complicity or official orders were recovered.
The point being made here regarding the Milwakee shooting, which comes less than a month after the Aurora shootings, is not the presence of deranged individuals bent on violence but the US government's systematic failure to curb domestic gun ownership that have exacerbated the death toll needlessly!
Perhaps there was no way to stop a deranged person from attacking the Sikh temple but the loss of life would be certainly more managable had stricter gun laws been in place and known white supermacists who were being monitored were denied access to firearms and ammunition.
I doubt anybody in America would disagree that the recent spate of mass casualty attacks is normal. If America can criticise India's human rights record, India's treatment of women, minorities and the like, why can't India do the same ?? After all India has never followed segregation based on skin color in its past, yet today they champion "equality" around the world, including in India!
MajorDamage
Dear Mazo,
India has never followed segregation? Really? Is this the same India that continues a caste system? The same India that still has 'untouchables' or are they just 'unmentionables' now? The same India that had more violent deaths AFTER independence from the British Empire than leading up to it? (Happy Independence Day India, 15 Aug) The same India that champions equality for who exactly?
The same India where 1/3 of the population wouldn't know about indoor plumbing and a toilet even if I flushed one in front of them? The same India that seems to know about modern 21st century things but doesn't really use them?
The USG failure to curb domestic gun ownership? I should be more understanding about the rest of the world that doesn't fully understand actual freedom to include property rights, weapons ownership and social mobility. What do you really know about American gun laws or rights for that matter?
Since you happen to have the internet and access to information, perhaps you can research the actual death toll from these incidents. From my vantage point, more in India die from a riverboat capsizing or train derailment than all of these shootings (from the past 20 yrs combined) or as the article pointed out, from a 'spontaneous' (but according to you, a non-event) kill on sight attacks on Sikhs in 1984. US police responded to this incident, did yours in 1984?
Mazo
@
MajorDamage
Name one Indian Law that condones or indeed even sanctions caste base discrimination!? Name one Indian law that sanctions the precepts of the caste system ? Comparing the caste system to the "official" and "legally" sanctioned discrimination that existed between Whites and Blacks in the United States till the 60s is ridiculous and just ignorant given that the "caste system" is a social practice that the government has outlawed but some of its elements continued to be practiced much like racists practice in the USA without "check". I think you are the one who need to be "educated" about India before you make analogies that are plain wrong.
The death toll under British rule is easily more than 50 million if you take into consideration all the wars, the famines, the riots of the partition etc. AFTER independence there has been no single incident where the death toll has crossed 50,000. The 1943 Bengal Famine itself casued 4 million deaths under British rule due to British Govt Policy. Whereas the United States has faced a civil war, slaughtered Native American villages by the dozens and till recently the USG was issuing rewards for Native American "scalps"! Coming to comparing death tolls, it is absurd to compare deaths from overcapacity riverboats to the deaths from yearly premeditated mass casuality shootings. If that were the case it would be safe to compare the number of fatalities from car accidents, drug overdoses and homicide in the US per capita to India also! And talking of the 1984 Sikh riots and since you have access to the Internet, you may find it usefull to take a look at the 1967 Newark Race riots, the 1968 Chicago riots, the 1992 LA riots, the Detriot riots, the Camden riots I could go on……but I ask you the same question, why did you police not stop these riots considering that the per capita police force for 100,000 people in India is just 130 while in the United States it is 233?
As to the credentials of India, India is a nation of 1.2 billion "free" people with over 50 major ethnicities (2000 ethnic groups), 21 official languages, 212 scheduled tribes officiall recognized and has the largest population of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Zorastrians, Baha'ai, Tibetan Buddhists in the world. It also has the largest Muslim population (3rd largest) of any non-muslim nation. India has 216 languages with more than 10,000 speakers and more than 1500 langauges and dialects in total. India's demographics are a melting point of all four major racial identities: Caucasoid, Australoid, Mongloid and Negritos. ALL these people are recognised by the Constitution of India as "INDIAN CITIZENS" and granted the same basic rights and priveleges under the Indian constition. Whereas, the United States is a nation of 320 million people of which 70% are White Europeans , 16% Hispanic, 12% Black, 4% Asian, etc.Religiously nearly 80% of the population can be identified as Christian, with atheism coming in at second place at 16% followed by Judaims at 1% and the rest. Do you honestly think you can compare the incredible diversity found in India to that largely homogeneous population of the United States to claim some kind of superior tolerance in American society ?? If you want to talk of moral equivalence, I would point out that NOTHING in India's 60 odd years comes close to the tragedies of the Japanese internment camps like Manzanar or your President Andrew Jackson's "Indian removal".
Coming to "actual freedoms", tell me how many states in the United States ban abortion ? How many States in the United States ban polygamy/polyandry ?? How many states in the United States openly display Christian iconography and observe its religious prayers in Government buildings ? How many Native American Senators have there been? How many Black Presidents before Obama? How many Female Presidents ? How many Native American Supreme Court Judges ? How many non-whites are heads of major corporations in the United States?? Just because the founding fathers of the United States "choose" to grant its citizens the right to bear arms does not in any way imply that the United States citizens are the only people who know about "actual freedoms"! 1.2 billions Indian beg to differ!
singh
India is a hypocrite country, it says what it never does and do what it never say. Regarding 1984, it wasn't riots, it was genocide which India has always termed as riots. Prime minister of india would have never said 'earth shakes when big tree falls', superstarcof that time Amitabh Bachan won't have come on the national TV to say 'blood for blood'. 3 batallions of army wouldn't have been restricted to stay in barriacks for 2nd and 3rd november despite reaching delhi on the morning of 2nd november, Home minister Narsimha rao wont have turned a blind eye when approached about the bloody massacre, tytler and Sajjan kumar wont have got the promotion for their role in the genocide. few muslims responsible for burning godhra train were puton trial but nobody is talking about the hindus who slaughtered 8 months pregnant women and hundreds of innocent people on the streets of gujrat despite the fact Tehalka telecasted their sting operation video on members of Vishwa Hindu Parishad and RSS, and how Narendra Modi changed the Judges one by one to set his men free. Indian judicial system is a mockery.
Ladi
Well you mentioned the riots in US; all those were responsible were charged and put in Jails. Would that happen in great democracy of India?
MajorDamage
Hi Mazo
You amuse me: just because you write more does not make you more right than I.
Please don't confuse our Civil War (1861-65) with the various Indian campaigns. For the record, it wasn't 'dozens of Native American villages' it was ALL of them. What, do you think that those NA/American Indians were all happy tree-hugging innocents that never hurt anyone? Think again as unprovoked atrocities tended to originate from them quite often. In war, some win some lose. Guess who lost.
The riots you mention were all race riots and most likely more are still to come. Unlike most of the world, Americans don't depend 100% on the police to protect us. Korean shopowners demonstrated that in the 1992 LA riots for example. Actually, the justice system has on multiple occasions had declared that US police don't have a duty to protect citizens but the public at large.
I'm not sure why you brought up diversity at all. America used to be called 'the melting pot' since there are peoples from everywhere here. Diversity by itself is a divisive term whereas 'melting pot' is inclusive. Since you used some numbers, you've dealt with math in your life. No country is truly 100% so there will always be a minority % but thanks for trying.
As for all of the 'charges' on who holds what office in the public or private sectors, I'm not responsible for how people vote or who they vote in. See, we don't have ALL of those jobs you mentioned (Senators, Presidents, CEOs, etc) appointed by some central commitee or body politic although it does seem like that. There is voter fraud and corruption. Voter ID would solve that.
I'm so glad that you speak for all 1.2 billion Indians. Makes my response simple and easy to broadcast since you can communicate to all of them.
Gagan
Point well noted. All the same for other issues like bringing black money home. If the sarkaar choses to act sanefuly- it's own delicate curtains would be raised revealing unpleasant, ugly truths. I bet nothing's going to move on Sikh holocaust's justice in New Delhi.
sangeeta munjal
Extremely intelligent and thought provoking article…………………………hope the Congress is hearing!!!!
Ladi
Thank You for bringing this up Sir… I like the way you think. India should learn from western countries that justice will prevail does not matter what are the conditions. India should serve justice first then point figure on others. Thank You
Mazo
You mean like how the United States has served justice to the millions of minorities it has "officially" persecuted for ages ? How the Native Americans have received "justice" for being driven off their lands and confined to reservations ? How the Blacks have received justice for centuries of discrimination and slavery ??
Spare us this speil about pointing fingers, the USA has no peer in throwing stones from glass houses! India and Indians have EVERY RIGHT to criticize the upside down society which tolerates and allows hate groups to flourish and allows them unlimited access to guns!
Ladi
Ok so you saying Native Americans are still being killed by whites for land? Black Americans are still slaves? You think they letting this happen when a police officer gets shot 9 times for saving the Sikhs? Native Americans got their own land/reservations where state can not implement their laws. Ask your government about almost half million Sikhs killed after the attack on Goldent Temple? Oh i'm sorry you probably don't even know about how many and how they were killed because most of the human rights books are banned in Inida. India is disgrace to democracy. Why don't you go read Indian constitution and find out why they do not recognize Sikhism, Jainism and Budhism separate religion? Read some history and find out what your forefathers promised Sikhs and what they said after Independence. Let me tell you if you don't know. Gandi and Nehru said sikhs will have their own state where they will have complete freedom of religion; guess what after the Independence he said we missed the bus and we are not separate religion just part of Hindu religion according to the filthy constitution of India. How come nobody is charged after delhi Sikh massacre?
anonymous
That is priceless considering India still has a caste system. Why don't you come into the 21st century before criticizing the US.