China’s photo-voltaic (PV) industry, better known as the “solar industry”, is in the middle of a serious crisis. The issue is particularly fascinating since it essentially serves as a microcosm for many of the troubles afflicting China’s economy as a whole, including government encouraged over-investment, an astounding run up of debt, government support of value-destroying firms, resulting trade frictions, and the tension between central and local government goals.
Nearly all the “big names” of the industry, including companies such as LDK Solar, Yingli Solar (which sports fans will recognize from its sponsorship at recent international soccer events) and Suntech Power Holdings are all facing the possibility of bankruptcy, consolidation, or both following a remarkable few years in China’s solar industry.
China’s solar module manufacturing capacity (supply) has exploded following the 2008 global financial crisis. During the ensuing economic difficulties, the Chinese government targeted the solar panel manufacturing industry as part of its stimulus. At first glance, the policy was perfect. Demand for renewable energy sources was increasing due to environmental concerns while generous government subsidies in the EU and U.S. were boosting both household and corporate demand for PV panels. Funds were poured into the solar sector in China, and companies such as Suntech, LDK and Yingli were happy to borrow. China’s solar module manufacturing capacity grew from less than 5 gigawatts in 2007 to a predicted 50 gigawatts at the end of this year (China’s 2011 capacity came it at just under 40 gigawatts), more than double the rest-of-world (RoW) total.
Unfortunately, demand for solar module installations has totally failed to keep pace with the mainly China-driven increase in supply. In 2007, total demand was also less than 5 gigawatts, but this has only increased to around 30 gigawatts today. Most of this increase has been in the RoW – China’s demand has picked up, from negligible levels in 2007 to an estimated 5 gigawatts at the end of this year. Meanwhile, the crisis hit EU subsidies, quite possibly because the supply side benefits were leaking abroad to China through its undercutting of EU producers’ prices.
China’s solar module supply glut, as with many other products suffering from the country’s over-investment driven capacity increases, has thus decimated the global market. For consumers and the environment, this is a good thing, since PV modules are now cheaper than ever, but for other countries’ PV industries, the Chinese drive has been painful to say the least, with bankruptcies already hitting Q-cells and Solon in Germany and Solyndra and Evergreen Solar in the U.S. Trade tensions in the solar sector have inevitably increased, with both the EU and the U.S. bringing cases against China for dumping and unfair subsidies, which include underpriced financing, back home.
The other result is that LDK, Suntech, Yingli and other Chinese firms are all on the verge of bankruptcy. During the boom years, they borrowed heavily to fund their investments. Now that prices have collapsed in the face of over-supply, Chinese PV firms are effectively incapable of paying back funds. As is often the case in China, what should be a clear cut case of down-sizing, bankruptcy or consolidation has so far been avoided thanks to massive support from local governments, which are unwilling to see unemployment rise in their areas. In particular, the governments of Xinyu and Wuxi have been trying to prop up LDK and Suntech, respectively.
Banks have begun to grumble, with smaller lenders suing LDK and more action to come. Added to the legal troubles are the financial ones: Suntech’s upcoming due date of $541 million of convertible notes is over 3 times the company’s market value of $164 million. LDK’s total debt was more than 7.5 times its total equity at the end of the first half, which is triple the equivalent figure from the previous year. So far though, the major Chinese lenders have not cut off the struggling solar industry – probably due to government pressure.
Chinese local governments are refusing to let the “natural selection” process go ahead. The central government is also boosting the amount of capacity to be installed in China, all of which is almost certain to go to domestic suppliers. However, even this will not be enough, since projected capacity installation still falls way short of China’s massive oversupply. Meanwhile China has launched trade cases of its own for some solar cell component parts which have inevitably seen exports to China rise. Consolidation is sure to be the theme in the global solar industry going forward, and as the installation capacity figures clearly demonstrate, the chief culprit is Chinese oversupply.
For individuals knowledgeable about the Chinese economy this story is a familiar one: Government-pushed over-investment leads to serious overcapacity; the overcapacity is artificially maintained by local governments and state banks fearing the social fallout that could accompany market forces; despite the inefficiencies, operations continue; the supply glut inevitably leads to distortions and suffering in global markets as the subsidized, loss-making Chinese producers swamp markets; foreign countries are hopelessly slow to react, but eventually do so; prompting China to respond with far more dubious trade cases of its own. More broadly, what is happening to China’s PV industry is a telling illustration of some of the flaws in the Chinese economy. Time will tell if these imbalances can be corrected.

Dewey Brophy
Certainly, but people need to appreciate that adding Solar in their home is an purchase that will raise the actual value of their home if / when they make a choice to sell. With the environment the way it is going we cannot disregard any system that offers totally free electricity at no cost to both the customer and more importantly the environment!
Mike Dwyer
Interesting to see you comment re 'LDK, Suntech, Yingli and other Chinese firms are all on the verge of bankruptcy' . These are major players in the Australian residential solar market. Should these firms fail we wonder what the ramifications for support / warranty etc would be. Solar roof top p.v. prices have dropped by over 60 percent in Australia since 2005. I guess there had to be a breaking point – maybe we have reached it. We will watch with interest!
Regards
Mike dwyer
http://solarenergyinformation.com.au/
nawfal
hi mrs directeur
i have this prices for l.energie solar for howsses in syriene republic
thinks for your interess ..
nofal ayash..
damascus
syria
Greg White
The only way solar can compete is through government subsidy and mandates. Wind is the same. The reason is simple physics, that is energy density. Both wind and solar are very, very low density energy sources. On top of that they are intermittent sources (non-windy days and nights) Neither can physically supply base load power for anything but a few perfect geographic locations, same for geothermal, and hydro-electric, but fewer.
Tarek
True, but keep in mind that big oil is also heavily subsidized thanks to lobbying. It is not just a matter of energy density.
Jaques666
Or…by inference, if the costs become competitive because other energy sources become more expensive. Or if we start to properly account for the negative externalities from producing energy from dirty sources and this drives up the real cost per unit of energy.
question
This simply isn't true. The energy density for PV is actually comparable to coal. Check out a typical rural (which is the majority) coal power plant. It has extensive grounds to handle the gneration, cooling ponds, coal ash basins, coal piles, rail unloading etc. If you do the numbers you get something like 30-50W/square foot though it varies. This isn't even counting the coal mining footprint (mountain top removal etc.?) or the transportation footprint (a fair fraction of total train traffic/rail mileage is devoted to coal). Solar PV gets something like 10W/ square foot. After taking full account the energy densities are pretty close to comparable. Within a factor of 2.
Intermittancy is another issues, but with joint wind/solar/hydro and some load management and storage the issue is not nearly as bad of you imagine. Combined cycle gas is a nice match to pick up remaining variations. We already have more than enough gas to compensate for variations even if ALL coal were replaced by wind and solar.
So, yes, wind and solar CAN be competitive even with out subsidy and mandates. In fact, in planty of places it already is. The point is, are we trying to accelerate our transition to renewable energy, not whether it is doable, or even if it is competitive. The anser to both of these latter questions is a provable yes.
Tim Magner
Why no mention of environmental laws?
the price of Chinese PV is low because they don’t have to recycle/clean their waste. It’s an externalized cost that US suppliers must pay. Thank the WTO for the race to the bottom. Why not more discussion?
PS. The WTO and other non-democratic institutions like the IMF generally work in favor of Western MNCs…
Leonard R.
China will keep subsidizing the companies. It's called 'Socialism with Chinese characteristics.'. There might be a merger or buy-out involved, the factories are not going anywhere. It will be up to RoW to place tariffs on the panels.
Gregory Jonassaint
I think to alleviate the problems which are present in the solor industry in china, the local and central authorites should take leadership roles and gradually redirect the affected population towards retraining in growth sectors economically.
Brianna
It's amazing how people always seem to think that the solution to problems caused by stupid government policies are more stupid government policies.
Lazy Investor
What do you think of First Solar ?
David
I agree with your analysis, but the collapse of the solar energy sector was not due to the Chinese government's intervention alone. It had more to do with the worldwide recession that followed the collapse of the US subprime mortgage market, which instigated a worldwide sell-off in energy commodities. The US govt also invested heavily in solar power for the exact same reasons as the Chinese did, except they could not compete cost-wise and were run out of the market causing a huge embarrassment to the Obama administration (something that was brought up repeatedly during Mitt Romney's campaign). The solar power industry was a huge bubble in the making, based on the foundation that energy prices would remain as high as they were midway through 2008. Solar companies from all across the world borrowed extensively based on this belief, and the belief that in an increasingly environmentally conscious world solar energy would be the future. However, when the worldwide recession hit and energy prices sank, people, govt's, and companies no longer cared about the environment and demand for this type of energy dropped. Most Solar companies were doomed since the beginning, and China had very little to do with that. Where China does shoulder some blame is by keeping their companies alive at the expense of every other solar company in the world. Nevertheless, the domestic situation inside China is different from that of the US and the EU. China functions as a single economic entity due to the government's control, so an imbalance here is "corrected' somewhere else. As long as the Chinese economy continues to expand at a faster rate than the US and the EU combined these types of practices will continue. Thus, I agree with your final message that time will tell if these imbalances can be corrected because they may never have to.
Jaques666
I agree, although I don't think the author blamed Chinese government intervention, just Chinese oversupply. The intervention did exist at the beginning, as cheap loans were funneled deliberately to Solar companies. The oversupply tables are disturbing if you have seen them on FT or SCMP.
Indeed many solar companies may have been doomed, but this support of Zombie Solar companies in China is meaning that not all companies are doomed equally! Meanwhile in China, your claim that China has some kind of secret formula of economic / business success that means that normal economics doesn't apply is absurd. They just shift the burden onto the household sector one way or another, or onto the world markets (absent trade cases to protect other players). Local government support of LDK or Suntech doesn't = local government control! They are not SOEs. As with other sectors, risks in China's solar sector are just being buried because the political leadership is too scared to face the pain of consolidation / restructuring.