What options does Japan have? Robert Dujarric gives us three in our China Power section here.
A few weeks back I likened China’s anti-access strategy vis-à-vis the United States to the “rope-a-dope” strategy Muhammad Ali pursued during his famous Rumble in the Jungle against George Foreman. In wartime, that is, China would let an initially stronger U.S. Pacific Fleet overextend and exhaust itself getting into the theater before risking a fleet-on-fleet battle. It would overcome the Pacific Fleet in the same manner the lighter, more agile Ali beat the burlier Foreman—with a flurry of punches against a tired adversary.
Such a strategy conforms to Mao Zedong’s counsel to let the other boxer waste his energy foolishly while conserving one’s own energy for the decisive counterpunch. But what about a match in which China played the part of Foreman, the bigger, stronger contestant?
There’s a boxing metaphor for China’s peacetime strategy as well. Retired Japanese vice admiral Yoji Koda says Beijing is “shadowboxing” with fellow Asian powers in the East China Sea. Sparring with them individually makes China the stronger competitor. Because numbers are on its side, for instance, China’s leadership can keep law-enforcement ships on station near the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, send PLA Navy task forces through the Miyako Strait and other waterways as a matter of routine, and otherwise overtax finite Japanese military and law-enforcement resources.
It can dance around the ring constantly—compelling its opponent to follow. So long as Tokyo feels the need to monitor Chinese maritime movements, it may wear out its coast guard and navy. In short, Beijing can impose a hyperactive operating tempo on the Japanese sea services—dispersing and enfeebling them while disheartening the Japanese leadership and electorate over time. Ultimately Tokyo may throw in the towel, acknowledging it can no longer keep pace.
China’s navy and police services can sustain such a tempo indefinitely without breaking equipment or tiring out crews. That’s the luxury of being the stronger party to peacetime competition. Shadowboxing, then, is a more offensive variety of the rope-a-dope strategy in which the boxer has no desire to knock out his opponent. He’s determined to win on points—even if it takes the full fifteen rounds, or another bout, or another one after that.
Moving around the ring constantly while feinting or jabbing against an opponent from a lighter weight class lets the shadowboxer score points without cutting loose with a haymaker. In so doing he preserves his strength. He avoids exposing himself to a lucky counterpunch. And he avoids making himself look like a bully in the crowd’s eyesfor decking an outclassed antagonist.
The main challenge is self-discipline. The shadowboxer has to content himself with a victory on points. That means foregoing the glory of a knockout. That’s a tough thing for any pugilist to swallow—especially a pugilist like China that’s attempting a comeback to reverse a long history of defeat.
But, why win by a knockout when you can win without fighting?
Nan Yang
Geography favors China. Diayu Dao is nearer to China mainland.
Furthermore for China to patrol within 12 mile limit is a new status quo. Before the "lsland Buying" thing by right wing Shintaro Ishihara, China marine Patrol ship never enter the 12mile limit.
This is also part of China answer to US pivot. Since Japan is key to this pivot. The strategy is to bash US's sweetest smelling ally Japan everyday and push Japan to the right. When Japan become more right wing, it will break Japan relationship with other neighboring countries like S. Korea and Taiwan. May even push them closer to China. US pivot will then be in trouble.
Dalai Dayak
Japan will give up the contested islands. It's a foregone conclusion.
Loki
Agreed, and China will give up Taiwan and Tibet that's also a foregone conclusion.
fairplay
Please explain why China should give up Taiwan or Tibet.
Meta
I think the JDSF do have satellite survellence capabilities, so, if it likes, it can simply monitor the Chinese survellence vessels from space and lodge a complaint; this, Japan can do forever and a day, if it percieves China not really wanting to risk a war, and not willing to take the islands, and just ‘Shadow box’ this type of action might have worked 20,30 years ago, but this strategy is very outdated, with the technology we have today, in such a case, it is China that ould tire it’s self out with such a strategy in the long run, and really gain nothing. I would go as far as to say this is exactely what China is doing, and so the the positive results for them in this endeavor are highly in doubt. I do think however that diplomacy and better trade could end this situation, and I hope they do, and not waste anymore resources, and focus more on there on own social issues without making an international inccident out of it.
major lowen gil marquez, phil army
The shadow boxing is diffinitely applicable to China and not on the US, because chinese communist is flexing its muscles and striking its job to all small country in South East Asia, if those country will be more mdernized like the Philippines and cooperated in team work with vietnam, japan, brunei, indonesia, and sotuh korea then this shadow boxer player bullying his SEA neighbors will have its own dosage of medicine that the US need not gave more extra physical effort…
Be Way
No, I don't think you understand fully the essence of China's conduct against its neighbors. Out of the 14 neighbors that bordered China, why is it always the same players that cried foul against China whether it's from Japan, Vietnam and maybe now Philippines. Philippines is just unfortunate that it's been caught in the geopolitical maneuver as a result of U.S pivot towards Asia. 'Unfortunate' is actually too mild a word to describe Philippines fate as Philippines is making a big and grave mistake if it intends to indulge itself into an act of provocation by aligning itself with U.S, Australia and Japan against China. As a small and poor country, Philippines should stear itself out from the sea of hostilities by negotiating with the Chinese directly instead of trying to act beyond its means. As for Japan and Vietnam, there will be more surprises unfolding in future as China is willing to play along with these two little brags if that's what they intended to based on historical ground.
Flam
@Be Way
I disagree on what you said I believe that Philippines is fortunate in terms of support that comes form other countries because they know its position in defending her claims of her territory is alligned with laws morality, and truth compared to China fabricating facts and stories to able come up “evidence” to make their claims seems real.
Matt
Speaking of a little brag, how do you think the rest of the world views seizing foreign territory by force? You can't seem to see the fact that the US is not deterred but is setting course for "air sea battle". The pivot isn't about diplomacy. If we are willing to send carrier after carrier through your own "territory" what makes you think we will back down in the future with more allies and resources prepared? Saddam didn't think we were going to do anything either… twice…and twice he was defeated. Syria and Iran thought we were never going to do anything either…
fairplay
I FULLY AGREE. I also think Philipines should add calcium to their diet.