On Tuesday, Japan's Defense Ministry reported that a Chinese frigate "illuminated" a Japanese destroyer with its fire-control radar near the embattled Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. Lighting up an adversary ship or aircraft designates it as a target for missiles or guns, and thus constitutes a prelude to firing on that adversary. The latest incident came after Tokyo publicly contemplated empowering Air Self-Defense Force pilots to fire warning shots in the vicinity of Chinese aircraft overflying the islets or adjoining waters. Which came on the heels of repeated encounters between the Japan Coast Guard and ships from China's maritime enforcement services. Tokyo also disclosed that a Chinese frigate illuminated one of its helicopters last month.
Chilling stuff.
The back-and-forth between the rival sea powers will feel at once familiar and unfamiliar to any mariner of a certain, ahem, vintage. The U.S. Navy and Soviet Navy played more than their share of hair-raising games during the Cold War — particularly in the 1970s and 1980s, once Fleet Admiral Sergei Gorshkov's progeny had matured into a peer competitor of the American fleet.
It was far from unusual for U.S. and Soviet warplanes, surface combatants, and especially submarines to target or maneuver around one another at close quarters. There were a variety of reasons for doing so that had little to do with indulging one's inner Maverick and Goose. For instance, goading an opponent into taking defensive measures revealed something about the tactics he would deploy in wartime. Such encounters also furnished an invaluable opportunity to collect information about the rival navy's sensors, electronic countermeasures, and weaponry. Electromagnetic emissions can be recorded and analyzed, with a view toward exposing and exploiting weaknesses. Tactical advantages can accrue.
And yet the run-ins between JSDF and PLA units feel different from their Cold War predecessors. There was a certain amount of flexibility in U.S.-Soviet brinksmanship, if only because the two sides were playing with each other for tactical reasons rather than competing over fixed geographic objects on the map. There was less to fire passions. Ideological one-upsmanship was commonplace. Being a provocateur was fun. But sovereignty — an arena for Thucydidean motives like fear and honor — wasn't at stake when American and Soviet units met in the nautical commons. Even so, enough near misses took place that Washington and Moscow ultimately felt obliged to negotiate an accord governing incidents at sea.
One hopes warriors on both sides — and their political masters — will exercise discipline in the East China Sea. A deliberate conflict would be bad enough. An inadvertent one that heightened uncertainty, narrowed options, and compressed the decision cycles in Tokyo and Beijing would prove even more parlous.

Kangming Zheng
The tensions will not last too long. Both parties are business people and will go back to business sooner or later. And Uncle Sam needs national tune up more than keep pulling China's leg. A crippled guy keep pulling another guy's leg is an exhausting business for everyone, including the bystanders. Just plain comments. No emotional reply please. By the way, Kangming Zheng is my real name.
Lnrds
China has the balls to bring their issues with Japan to the UNCLOS but when it comes to their claims in the West Philippine sea they avoid the UNCLOS. @#%ken BS Chinese
Michael R. Johnson
@Lnrds,
Here we go again. This is Japan's another ineffective attempt to pull another party to her side. Save it, Japan.
Japan can play the same ineffective trick forever without any acheivement, just like her economy struggle since 1990's.
denk
*Japan and China: Tensions Mounting*
hmmm, i wonder why ?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33869.htm
benedict
Poor CHINESE, they are brainwashed by their government. IF CHINA REALLY OWNS THE ISLANDS, THEY SHOULD PROVE IT. NOT THIS BULLYING TACTICS ON ITS WEAKER NEIGHBORS PHILIPPINES, VIETNAM AND ITS AGGRESIVENESS TO JAPAN. I REALLY BELIEVE PHILIPPINES' OWNERSHIP OF THE SCARBOROUGH IS UNDISPUTED AS WELL AS SOME PARTS OF THE SPRATLY ISLANDS INSIDE THEIR EEZ, UNLIKE THE CASE FOR JAPANANG VIETNAM. IM TAKING SIDES WITH THE PHILIPPINES HERE BECAUSE THEY ARE WEAK, YET STRONG WILLED. THEY EVEN BROUGHT THE DISPUTE TO THE UN TO ENSURE FAIR ARBITRATION BUT IT IS CHINA DOESN'T WANT TO GO BECAUSE THEIR NINE-DASH CLAIM ON THE SOUTH CHINA SEA HAS NO LEGAL BASIS AND IS ALL FROM THEIR NOT SO TRUSTED HISTORICAL MAP. THEY WANT BILATERAL TALKS BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THEY WILL WIN BY SCARE TACTICS. WHAT'S THE POINT OF BILATERAL TALK IF THEY ALREADY STATED THAT THEY HAVE UNDISPUTABLE SOVERIGNITY OVER THE ISLES.
CMON CHINA, I CHALLEGE YOU! FACE PHILIPPINES IN THE UN TRIBUNAL AND SEE WHAT YOU'RE MADE OF! DON'T COME SHOWING "OH I HAVE BIG GUNS BOY" BECAUSE THAT IS BEING A COWARD.
sorry guys if its CAPS LOCKED, im just too disappointed with China's behaviours as well as falsified facts and brainwashing of their people. Also, don't blame USA because they would not meddle if China do such improper acts. Don't expect being entitled as a SUPERPOWER because that title is only given after respect of many nations is earned. Picking fights with your neigbors is not a good start.
denk
benedict
*sorry guys if its CAPS LOCKED, im just too disappointed with China's behaviours as well as falsified facts and brainwashing of their people. Also, don't blame USA because they would not meddle if China do such improper acts.*
china is only making the same claim as tw n vn
whats so *improper* about that ?
usa the world cop eh, no kidding ?
what did the vietnamese, koreans, afghanist, iraqis, philippinos, apaches etc, just to name a few, did wrong that needed usa's *meddling* , to the tune of millions dead or miamed ?
http://space4peace.blogspot.com/2013/02/kill-them-all.html
CCP’s Mistress
at least eight of the nine members of the outgoing Politburo Standing Committee and Xi Jinping, China's top decision-making body,have a child or family members who has studied or worked extensively abroad.
1) Xi JinPing's daughter is studying at Harvard,
2) Li Keqiang and the incumbent, Wen Jiabao, both have children who have studied in the United States; Winston Wen studied at Northwestern University and went on to found the private equity firm New Horizon Capital.
3) Hu Jintao's son-in-law, Daniel Mao, studied at Stanford, worked in Silicon Valley, and headed the Internet portal Sina, which owns the popular micro-blogging service Sina Weibo.
4) The daughter of propaganda chief Li Changchun, Li Tong, studied at the University of New South Wales in
Sydney, and now has a senior investment banking position at the state-owned Bank of China.
5)Zhou Bin, the son of security chief Zhou Yongkang is believed to have studied in Canada,
5) A son of the Standing Committee's fourth-ranking member, Jia Qinglin, is rumored to have been living in Australia, while granddaughter Jasmine Li studied at Stanford.
While The CCP's sons,daughters, family members are safe,and breathing fresh air in western countries. They are beating up the war drum to expect regular chinese parent to send their only child to the battle and die?
papa john
Of course, these princelings are doing a laundry job of billions of dollars, their parents collecting "tax". Ah, these princelings all adop western names like John Chan, James the Chinese and Frank in this blog. Perhaps, they feel ashamed of Chinese names. Understandable.
Danny
Well, when you listen to Creedence Clearwater Revival's classic titled "Fortunate Son". that just tells you what politicians are capable of by incitating regular citizens to go and fight while the silver-spooned children are kept far out of harm's way. I sure don't want things to come down to this, so I wish the ordinary Chinese citizens can keep their eyes peeled on this because the CCP and the PLA are doing things that may not match the people's interests at all.
wessille
in my personal knowledge the DANGER is from in the arm complict of any nation but the POVERTY AND ''GLOBAL WARMING SOON'' thank you''
JAPANisUS’sMistress
@CCP's Mistress,
Chinese in China will fight Japan, not to mention other Chinese in foreign countries.
TypicalWumao
As usual, China the trouble maker is causing tension again.
Clean Eastwood
@Typicalwumao,
The real trouble maker is Japan, in this situation. So are you pro Japan gangs here.
FrustratedNAngryTaiwanBoy
@TypicalWumao,
The trouble maker is Japan, of course Uncle Sam too.
juju abs
John Chan…. Why did china claimed the scarborough/panatag/bajo de masinloc reef? it's too far from china and very near to the philippines? how come that is part of this F.S country? the issue is on the senkaku islands and is similar to the scarborough reef the problem is that it's china who took the reef from the weak filipinos, while in the senkaku the chinese are the weaklings…. so how was that? M.F. chinese
John Chan
@juju abs,
Corazon Aquino used the same argument as yours to assert Philippines’ ownership over those islands, but Deng told her that the Philippines was very close to China too. Now China shows the Philippines those islands as well as the Philippines are very close to China in reality. Filipino vacates the remaining islands they are encroaching on will be a friendly and prudent move.
Big Brother Marcos
@juju abs,
You should just post comments and blog here with clean and appropriate language. Take back and reserve the M.F. for yourself. You make our country Phillpinnes disgraceful. I bet you are not grown up in Phillipines but in United States, right? Or are you just another Japanese who fake Phillipines guy here? Shame on you. May God forgive you.
Marcos
juju abs,
Please keep your language clean and don't make our country Philipines being disgraceful.