China’s White Paper: Implications for Southeast Asia

How might other South China Sea claimants responds to China’s maritime strategy?

China’s White Paper: Implications for Southeast Asia
Credit: Official U.S. Navy Page

China released its first white paper on military strategy at the end of last month. Issued by the State Council Information Office, the white paper outlines China’s strategy of “active defense,” and highlights four critical security domains: the ocean, outer space, cyberspace, and nuclear forces. For the states of Southeast Asia, China’s outlined military strategy for the ocean is going to be of particular interest, and is likely to elicit much concern. A number of regional states have been engaged in maritime territorial disputes with China.

In recent years, China has become more assertive in its claims that the whole South China Sea falls under its control. China’s white paper will have a number of implications for these regional states, and for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which to date has had little success in bringing an end to the maritime conflict. With ASEAN essentially moribund, the states of Southeast Asia will increasingly engage in both internal and external balancing to counter the Chinese threat. This will manifest itself in increased regional defense spending, and enhanced security commitments with external powers.

Although China’s white paper outlines four critical security domains, it is likely that China’s military strategy with respect to the ocean will elicit most concern for the states of Southeast Asia. According to the white paper, some of China’s “offshore neighbors” have taken “provocative actions” in the South China and East China seas, and have established their presence on China’s islands “illegally.” The paper also highlights how “some external countries are also busy meddling in South China Sea affairs; a tiny few maintain close-in air and sea surveillance and reconnaissance against China.” While the U.S. is not named explicitly, there is little doubt as to which country China is referring to here. Faced with these territorial threats, the report states, “in line with the evolving form of war and national security situation, the basic point for PMS [preparation for military struggle] will be placed on winning informationized local wars, highlighting maritime military struggle and maritime PMS.” To counter new threats, “the traditional mentality that land outweighs sea must be abandoned.” China will therefore develop “a modern maritime military force structure commensurate with its national security and development interests [and] safeguard its national sovereignty and maritime rights and interests.” The PLA Navy will enhance its capabilities for “open seas protection,” including deterrence and counterattack. In accordance with its policy of “active defense,” the paper claims that China “will not attack unless we are attacked, but we will surely counterattack if attacked.”

China’s white paper has a number of implications for Southeast Asia. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei all have overlapping maritime territorial claims with China. Whilst these states are likely to display the most concern following the release of China’s white paper, the report has implications for the security of the region as a whole. According to a recent defense spending report, annual defense spending in Southeast Asia is projected to reach $52 billion by 2020, from an expected $42 billion in 2015. The Southeast Asian states were expected to spend $58 billion on military hardware over the next five years, much of which is expected to cover naval procurement. However, as a collection of small states, it is unlikely these enhanced military capabilities will do much to deter China. While internal balancing as a response to the Chinese threat is to be expected, this will carry little weight unless combined with external balancing. We can therefore expect to see an increase in security cooperation with external powers, specifically the United States.

The Philippines and the U.S. signed an Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement in April 2014. However, China’s increasingly assertive actions in the South China Sea have caused the Philippines Defence Minister to call for a “stronger commitment” from the U.S. with respect to maritime security. Vietnam does not currently have any defense agreements with the U.S., but this may be something Hanoi will seek to rectify in the coming months. Instead, Vietnam has sought closer security ties with regional powers. A deal to consult on defense affairs was concluded with Australia in March 2015. Similarly, Japan has sought to expand its security ties in Southeast Asia. Japan signed a defense pact with Indonesia in March 2015; following enhanced military partnerships with the Philippines and Vietnam. This counter-balance to China is vital to the security of Southeast Asia. Regional institutions, such as ASEAN or the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), have proven incapable of regional conflict resolution.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Rather than providing a multilateral response to the conflict, China has succeeded in dividing ASEAN on the topic of the South China Sea. China refuses to deal with the issue on a multilateral basis, preferring to deal with those states involved bilaterally. As the recent Rohingya migrant crisis has shown, ASEAN is largely incapable of responding to regional conflicts, despite its professed norm of providing a regional solution to regional problems. As China advances its muscular policy in the South China Sea, we can instead expect regional states to resort to classic balance of power politics to protect their security and territorial integrity.

Laura Southgate is a third year PhD student studying International Relations of Southeast Asia at the University of Otago, New Zealand.