Subscribe

Tag

ASEAN Unity

Page 2 of 2
No ASEAN Consensus on the South China Sea
July 21, 2016

No ASEAN Consensus on the South China Sea

By Termsak Chalermpalanupap
Don't hold out too much hope for a unified stance at the upcoming ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting in Laos.
The South China Sea Award Is Finally Here: What Happens Now?
July 15, 2016

The South China Sea Award Is Finally Here: What Happens Now?

By Ankit Panda and Prashanth Parameswaran
The Diplomat‘s Ankit Panda and Prashanth Parameswaran discuss the outcome of the South China Sea arbitration case.

ASEAN Can't Be Silent On South China Sea Ruling
July 14, 2016

ASEAN Can't Be Silent On South China Sea Ruling

By Prashanth Parameswaran
Even if it does not issue a separate statement, the grouping should adopt a strong communique.

After the Big South China Sea Verdict, What Will ASEAN Say?
June 30, 2016

After the Big South China Sea Verdict, What Will ASEAN Say?

By Ankit Panda
ASEAN foreign ministers will convene days after the highly anticipated South China Sea verdict drops. What will they say?

No Brexit Repeat in ASEAN
June 28, 2016

No Brexit Repeat in ASEAN

By Termsak Chalermpalanupap
No country is looking to leave the Southeast Asian bloc -- yet.
Just How United Is ASEAN Against China Over the South China Sea?
June 24, 2016

Just How United Is ASEAN Against China Over the South China Sea?

By Ankit Panda and Prashanth Parameswaran
Ankit Panda and Prashanth Parameswaran discuss ASEAN unity and North Korea's recent Musudan missile testing.

Revealed: The Truth Behind ASEAN's Retracted Kunming Statement
June 19, 2016

Revealed: The Truth Behind ASEAN's Retracted Kunming Statement

By Carl Thayer
New details on the June 14 meeting between ASEAN and China shed light on the imbroglio surrounding ASEAN's statement.
The ASEAN-China Special Meeting Mystery: Bureaucratic Snafu or Chinese Heavy-Handedness?
June 17, 2016

The ASEAN-China Special Meeting Mystery: Bureaucratic Snafu or Chinese Heavy-Handedness?

By Carl Thayer
Was ASEAN consensus undermined or is there a more mundane bureaucratic explanation for the confusion surrounding the statement?

Page 2 of 2