Features

Burma’s Most Unenviable Politician

Recent Features

Features | Politics | Southeast Asia

Burma’s Most Unenviable Politician

As Burma prepares for potentially groundbreaking by-elections on April 1, spare a thought for the man running against Aung San Suu Kyi.

Meet the most unenviable man in Burma. His name is Tin Yi, and he’s the David facing off against two Goliaths in April’s by-election in the constituency of Kawhmu, an otherwise unremarkable but idyllic village in the bucolic Irrawaddy River delta, just a few miles east of Yangon.

He woke up one morning in January to find out that arguably the most famous person in Burma, Aung San Suu Kyi, had chosen to run in his constituency. His third opponent, meanwhile, is former military man Soe Min, a member of the well-moneyed incumbent ruling party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party.

Suu Kyi has been drawing crowds by the thousands at her countrywide campaign rallies, while Soe Min has been offering free medical services with his traveling clinic in isolated villages in the countryside surrounding his constituency.

But Tin Yi, 77, is a far cry from his glamorous political opponents: his teeth are stained red from his five-a-day betel chewing habit, he suffers from hypertension, what he describes as a swollen heart, and a gravity-defying belly. He says he would have been dead a long time ago if he didn’t have politics to motivate him. His low key efforts stand in stark contrast to Suu Kyi, who has among other things spent the better part of a year since her release meeting with diplomats, receiving awards, and campaigning among parades of adoring fans.

The impossible situation in which Tin Yi finds himself encapsulates the changes taking place in Burma’s budding democracy, a political landscape dominated by giants, celebrities and dusty relics of a bygone socialist era. These days, political campaigns are defined by spectacle, coercion and corruption, with ever-shrinking political space for smaller opposition and ethnic parties.

Suu Kyi had a small second home built in Kawhmu last month to qualify as a candidate there.

“When I found out Daw Suu was running in my constituency, I didn’t feel anything. I had already decided to run in Kawhmu several months before, and I didn’t think it was the honorable thing to do as a politician to be intimidated by Daw Suu. So I just kept on doing what I was doing,” Tin Yi says. “Of course I want to win. Nothing is decided yet, we’ll have to wait for April 1. Anything can happen.”

Anything indeed, apparently, as Suu Kyi’s party has already cried foul over egregious errors in the voter lists, which included the names of dead people, underage “voters” as young as 10 or 11 years-old, and people who appear to simply not exist in the village, according to her campaign manager and lawyer U Nyan Win. USDP candidates have been widely accused of bribing constituents not to attend NLD rallies, or even outright buying votes.

Though the election commission has promised a free and fair election, it turned a blind eye to the USDP’s dirty tricks during the 2010 election, when the party managed to edge out well-respected members of the opposition by stuffing ballot boxes with advanced votes. USDP party chairman U Htay Oo admits to failures in the past, but claims this election will be different. “We are still learning,” he says of his government’s relative inexperience with democracy. Of the bogus voter lists, he says they are simply honest errors of the understaffed registration offices.

Tin Yi’s party, the four-month-old Unity and Peace Party, has made itself unpopular by objecting to Suu Kyi’s candidacy on the grounds that she was married to a foreigner, and has lived abroad, the same objections made to her candidacy back in 1990. Indeed, he has earned himself the unflattering nickname “Sister Tin Yi” in reference to his petty behavior.

Suu Kyi’s campaign manager, U Nyan Win, has piled on, saying of the UPP: “I believe they are a party that wants to be famous for being the party that opposes Daw Suu. They are a new party, and just want to make a name for themselves.”

But UPP chairperson U Ohn Lwin insists they have no personal grudge against Suu Kyi, arguing that they simply wish to uphold constitutional law. When he finally went to the commission office to argue his case, no representative from Suu Kyi’s party, the NLD, even bothered to show up.

Suu Kyi calls herself a regular politician, despite her rock star status and the fact that few dare criticize her openly. Suu Kyi and the NLD have been a dissident group crying foul from the sidelines for 23 years, which has earned them respect from the people. But Tin Yi expects the period after the election will be a true test of their ability to make the transition from the sidelines into mainstream politics. “She has studied politics in theory and has traveled abroad, but she has little practical knowledge,” he says. “Don’t you have sympathy for me? Just a little? You have tremendous sympathy for Daw Suu because she was under house arrest. But at least she has a nice house. I’m an old man who struggles to feed his family.”

Soe Min similarly portrays Suu Kyi as politically inexperienced. “What we have learned about politics we have learned through struggles. I’ve been with the people; I help them with their health. I know their problems,” he says. Yet even her political opponents – those who criticize her for being isolated, privileged, or impractical – have an undeniable sense of respect for Daw Suu. “It’s an honor to be running against the daughter of Aung San, our national hero,” Soe Min says.

“In fact, if I weren’t running in this race, I’d vote for her,” Tin Yi says. “Frankly speaking, not even my wife and family thinks I can win. Let’s be honest, look at the people I’m running against.”

“The NLD and the USDP are the same in that sense: they are two parties that are large in terms of member numbers, budget, and having high visibility among the people. They can rely on those advantages to edge out other parties, who have a smaller voice,” Tin Yi says.

Tin Yi’s party chairman, U Ohn Lwin, agrees that it would be a shame if smaller parties are completely shut out. “There must be many voices,” he says. “This is democracy. Agree to disagree.”

Gabrielle Paluch is a Southeast Asia-based writer. Her work has appeared in Christian Science Monitor, among other publications.