China Power

Press Freedom in China ‘Deplorable’: IFJ

Recent Features

China Power

Press Freedom in China ‘Deplorable’: IFJ

The International Federation of Journalists slams the deteriorating situation for journalists in China.

Press Freedom in China ‘Deplorable’: IFJ
Credit: Beijing newspapers via Mario Savoia /

An annual report on press freedom in China published this week by the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has slammed the deteriorating situation for journalists working in China, and highlighted the increasingly active role mainland authorities are taking to exert influence on the press in Hong Kong and Macau.

“The state of press freedom and freedom of expression in China in 2014 was deplorable,” IFJ Asia-Pacific said in its report, CHINA’s MEDIA WAR: Censorship, Corruption & Control.

Among the significant developments highlighted by the IFJ:

  • China’s regulator for state-owned media – the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film, and Television (SAPPRFT) – issued a directive in June specifying that journalists must not write “critical” stories without prior approval from their employers, and that journalists should not work “outside their assigned area of coverage.”
  • The SAPPRFT issued directives banning journalists from reporting on “state secrets, commercial secrets, unpublished information, and so on,” and that journalists could not “reproduce, copy or store” such information, or “talk or write to others in private” about it.
  • Beginning in 2014, journalists working in China will be required to pass an exam in order to qualify for press accreditation. The training materials for the exam are said to emphasize government-friendly ideology, and encourage journalists to take on the role of guiding public opinion.

Chinese authorities have also tightened their grip on the internet, with the establishment of the Central Internet Security and Informatization Leading Group in February 2014.

Although the leading group is ostensibly tasked with formulating China’s cyber security strategy and developing the country into a “cyber power,” subsequent security measures that were rolled out resulted in websites and blogs being shutdown, millions of posts being removed from social media platforms, and scores of arrests without charge, according to the IFJ.

Press freedom in Hong Kong, meanwhile, endured a “chilling” 2014.

Several journalists in Hong Kong were victims of intimidation and violent assaults, while a number of television, radio, and print outlets struggled with self-censorship due to internal and external pressure.

Two leading Hong Kong-based newspapers, Ming Pao and the Hong Kong Economic Journal, were accused of practicing self-censorship, along with Hong Kong’s largest free-to-air television station, TVB, and public broadcaster RTHK.

In all cases upper management at these media groups was suspected of intervening in editorial decisions in order to avoid falling foul of authorities in China and Hong Kong – as well as influential advertisers – according to the IFJ.

Although mainstream media outlets in Hong Kong are loosely lumped into two camps – “pro-Beijing” and “pro-democracy” – the Occupy Central Movement triggered an unprecedented departure from editorial independence, with many Hong Kong media organizations accused of bias.

A survey of the public’s trust in the media by the Chinese University of Hong Kong found that the credibility of the media had fallen to its lowest level since Hong Kong’s return to China in 1997.

Robert Sullivan is a Hong Kong-based journalist. He covers energy for Interfax and writes on current affairs in China and Hong Kong. He received his Masters in Asia-Pacific Policy from the University of British Columbia.