The Pulse

In India’s Elections, Voters Will Choose Between Guns and Butter

Recent Features

The Pulse

In India’s Elections, Voters Will Choose Between Guns and Butter

India’s election sees the two major national parties adopting drastically different pitches to the electorate.

In India’s Elections, Voters Will Choose Between Guns and Butter
Credit: OgreBot via Wikimedia Commons

On April 11, India begins the first phase of voting for its 2019 general elections. An estimated 900 million eligible voters will cast their votes over seven phases lasting nearly six weeks. In the lead-up to this election, India’s two major political parties – the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the opposition Indian National Congress (INC) – have run vastly different campaigns, offering divergent views for the future of India. While Narendra Modi’s BJP has run a campaign that emphasizes nationalism, security, and strength, the INC, led by Rahul Gandhi, has advanced a message of welfare, social justice, and equality. Over the next six weeks, Indian voters face a stark choice: the BJP’s guns, or the INC’s butter.

The BJP’s Security-Centric Campaign

As Prime Minister Modi and the BJP make their case for a second term leading India’s government, the word that has defined their campaign is the Hindi word, “chowkidar,” which translates to “watchman.” The “chowkidar” moniker began as a social media campaign launched by the prime minister to promote elected members, party leaders, and supporters from the BJP to add a “chowkidar” prefix to their Twitter display names. However, the “watchman” theme has quickly defined how the BJP is trying to make the election about security issues, and how the BJP, with Narendra Modi at the helm, will watch over India and protect against “fighting corruption, dirt, [and] social evils.”

The BJP took this one step further in their election manifesto, released on April 8. Within the opening paragraphs, the manifesto notes that “to achieve our long-term goals, we must first secure our country against internal and external aggression.” This statement is followed up with the BJP’s opening salvo, a section titled “Nation First,” with the first promise of the manifesto declaring the BJP’s “Zero-Tolerance Approach to Terrorism” after referencing the recent airstrikes against Pakistan following the February 14 deadly terrorist attack in Pulwama. The manifesto goes on to list the BJP’s major promises in putting the “Nation First” along similar, security-centric lines, such as removing special rights in India’s constitution for the state of Jammu and Kashmir, modernizing India’s armed forces, and strengthening border security infrastructure.

This “security first” message runs in direct contrast with the BJP’s successful campaign five years ago, which was marked by then-Chief Minister Narendra Modi referring to himself as “vikas purush” or “development man,” and a laser focus on the state of the economy. Indeed, the BJP’s 2014 manifesto opens with references to rising prices, jobless growth, and corruption, leaving issues of security buried deep in the final pages. However, facing allegations of jobless growth and economic mismanagement, the BJP has leaned into the aftermath of the air strikes against Pakistan, placing its bets on security as the winning election theme for the 2019 elections.

The INC Prioritizes the Economy and Welfare

While the BJP has placed economic issues in the background of its 2019 campaign, the INC has brought them to the forefront of theirs, arguably making economics and welfare the hallmark of their campaign so far. The INC has already had some success in prioritizing these issues. In December 2018, the INC defeated the BJP in three key state elections, which are viewed as bellwethers for the 2019 elections. In its campaign in these states, the INC made promising waivers for loans taken out by farmers central to their campaign, thereby tapping into growing anger on part of India’s farmers against the BJP-led government in New Delhi, as well as rising dissatisfaction with the BJP’s achievement on providing Prime Minister Modi’s promise of “acche din” or “good days.”

In its own manifesto for the 2019 elections, the INC has leaned into the economic narrative in the opening pages. The manifesto begins with a section titled “Employment and Growth,” a stark contrast to the BJP’s “Nation First” clarion. The INC manifesto goes on to call “unemployment the “gravest challenge to the country” and placing the blame squarely on the Modi government for “growing unemployment and the destruction of existing jobs.” It makes several key promises on improving employment, such as creating a “new Ministry of Industry, Services and Employment,” filling all 400,000 vacancies in the central government by March 2020, and exempting all micro, small, and medium enterprises in India from major regulations.

However, the INC’s focus on economic issues goes beyond employment or job creation and makes welfare a key component of its 2019 campaign. In January 2019, on the heels of its victory in the state elections of December 2018, Rahul Gandhi announced that his party was “committed to a Minimum Income Guarantee for every poor person, to help eradicate poverty & hunger” should his party come to power in 2019. The INC manifesto detailed this promise, outlining a plan to offer Rs. 72,000 ($1,035) per year to the poorest 20 percent of India’s population under a program called Nyuntam Aay Yojana, or NYAY, which translates to “justice.”  Justice, welfare, and economy are, therefore, shaping up to be the INC’s answer to the BJP’s national security narrative for the 2019 elections.

With the release of INC’s and the BJP’s manifestos, the stage is set for a battle of narratives in India’s 2019 general elections. While the BJP looks to advance a vision of safety and security under a second term for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the INC is positioning itself to present a vision of economic development and welfare. As Indian voters head to the polls and decide who they will vote for in the upcoming elections, they will face a fundamental choice beyond the names on the ballot. They will need to choose between guns or butter.

Aman Thakker is a Research Associate at the Wadhwani Chair in U.S.-India Policy Studies at CSIS and a Contributor for The Diplomat.