India terrorism

Hindutva violence is not included in India’s official conception of terrorism, but rather enjoys the blessing of the state. 

For South Asia in particular – a region plagued with insurgency and cross-border tension for several decades – Hamas' devastating attack on Israel presents numerous lessons in warfare. 

In the past, Pakistan has accused India of eliminating people who threatened its control over Kashmir, but was rarely taken seriously by the international community.

As drone sightings along the always-tense border increase, India must increase its attention to C-UAS technology. 

There is a clear continuum from the events that led up to the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992 to the looming darkness that confronts India today. But it’s not what you think.

But will it succeed in persuading the world that India is a perpetrator of terrorism in the region rather than a victim?

On October 30, 2008, bombings in Assam killed 88 and injured 500. Who was behind the attack – and why?

The Muslim killers of a Hindu tailor have rightly been charged under a terrorism law. But Hindutva extremists are rarely punished, let alone charged under terrorism laws.

While fingers point to an Iranian involvement, Indian security services will find it difficult to cut through the fog of plausible deniability.

The Modi government’s decision to revoke the autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 has improved the region’s security situation.

New Delhi wants to divorce human rights advocacy from its fight against Islamist terrorism.

What does the Nangarhar jailbreak tell us about the terror group’s recruitment in India?