Canberra’s reactive approach to the Korean Peninsula is antithetical to its interests and middle power aspirations.

A year in office, it’s time to examine South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s economic policies.

Lost amid the diplomatic flurry are clear signs that the Trump administration’s hardline stance has not changed.

Kim Jong-un’s concessions can be read as genuine or merely calculated moves, but it depends who you ask.

Trump enjoys flattery, so the South Koreans are flattering him into engaging North Korea diplomatically.

Seeking international recognition through grand sport events exacts a heavy price on Asian cities.

Over the weekend, Moon briefed Abe by telephone about his discussions with Kim.

The most likely outcome is that we will essentially end up where we began.

Given Australia's economic interests in Northeast Asia, how does Canberra view the Inter-Korea summit?

How impactful are the summit’s agreements and how will they influence the Trump-Kim summit?

Ultimately, South Korea’s engagement strategy comes down to the realities of the Korean Peninsula.

A possible peace treaty is viewed favorably, but many remain skeptical of Pyeongyang.

The summit between the two Koreas will set the tone for the Trump-Kim summit.

At the April 27 summit, there’s room for lowering tensions and making progress on the peninsula.

The upcoming rush of summits is a litmus test for Moon’s leadership.

The recent controversies should be viewed in light of South Korea’s long bipartisan history of censorship.