U.S. China policy

Washington needs to enact the concept of “strategic sequencing” to avoid fighting a two-front war against nuclear-armed rivals.

History shows us that blithely chasing consensus could lead decision-makers in Washington astray, with disastrous consequences.

China policy has become a proxy for different economic strategies at home: more investment (and deficit spending) vs. budget cuts and a market-driven approach.

By designating China a developed rather than developing nation, proposed U.S. legislation would challenge the credibility of how Beijing frames its international cooperation. 

The stronger identity dynamics become, the more likely they are to reduce all the specific strategic choices into a single decision: to side with the U.S. or China.

Omar – and other progressive Democrats – seem to be pivoting toward a harder line stance on China as they come under Republican fire.

Aside from longstanding historical issues, the three countries will face challenges in sustaining coordination on North Korea and China policy. 

Republicans may find they can best pursue two top agenda items – contain China and cripple Biden – by intertwining them.

The Biden administration trumpets its efforts to build consensus on China policy through consultation. Recent legislation challenged that. 

Addressing collective challenges such as climate change will require abandoning militarized approaches for cooperation and diplomacy.

Doing what is “right” on a wide range of issues has reinforced the momentum in U.S. efforts to counter Beijing.