U.S. China strategy

The Biden administration trumpets its efforts to build consensus on China policy through consultation. Recent legislation challenged that. 

The renewed focus on nuclear weapons amid the contest with China raises the risk of nuclear use – and reduces the likelihood of arms control talks.

Insights from Raymond Kuo.

A new grand strategy is desperately needed to meet not only the military threat posed by Russia, but the more comprehensive threat from China.

The U.S. military and its civilian leaders are overemphasizing militarized responses to what is largely an economic and diplomatic challenge.

From Trump to Biden, Congress has remained at the center of the so-called Washington consensus to end previous engagement in favor of strong opposition to Beijing.

The United States is currently at a crossroads with its strategic approach to China. Can “neo-engagement” provide a path forward?

NATO’s China policy must focus on core business.

Kennedy’s “flexible response” strategy for deterring and countering Soviet aggression in the 1960s could be used again.

The administration is pursuing a whole-of-government approach to counter China's concept of Comprehensive National Power.

Comparing McMaster’s China prescriptions to George Kennan’s famous containment strategy.