Chen Exposes Communist Goliath
Image Credit: U.S. State Department

Chen Exposes Communist Goliath


The drama of Chen Guangcheng, the blind self-taught lawyer who made a daring escape from his captors in his home village in Shandong to the American Embassy in Beijing this month, has almost certainly earned its place in Chinese history.   Future generations will likely compare Chen to the lone student who stood in front of a tank in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. It’s doubtful whether a more inspiring film script could have been written that would do justice to the courage and defiance embodied by Chen’s story.

The apparent agreement between Beijing and Washington to allow Chen to go to the United States as a visiting scholar in the very near future may have put an end to this heart-wrenching episode for now, but the fallout from this event, both for Chinese diplomacy and the ruling Communist Party’s ability to maintain control in an increasingly volatile political environment, will be significant and lasting.

On the diplomatic front, the relative flexibility demonstrated by Beijing in handling this crisis has definitely prevented an even more damaging outcome.  The all-important U.S.-China relationship was spared another body blow.

Yet, Beijing should find no cause for cheer. The damage done to the Chinese government’s image abroad is incalculable. For almost a week, the world was riveted by the unfolding drama of Chen’s escape. People all over the world cared about Chen’s wellbeing because he was a powerful symbol for courage and social justice. This couldn’t be good news for Chinese leaders, now seen as complicit in Chen’s mistreatment by thugs hired by local government officials. China may have invested tens of billions of dollars, including extravaganzas like the Beijing Olympics and the Shanghai Expo, to boost its international standing. All it takes to undo such “soft power” offensives is one lonely blind man who dared to show to the rest of the world the cruelty and repressiveness of the current Chinese political system.

For the party, the domestic political fallout is perhaps even more worrying. Chen’s escape revealed the incompetence of its repressive apparatus. If more than a hundred thugs couldn’t guard a blind man, one wonders whether this costly apparatus could do much else. Another disquieting development for the Chinese government during this episode was the failure of its censorship system in blocking out the news of Chen’s escape. Of course, the censors tried hard, but China’s Twitter equivalent, the micro blogs, made their job impossible, as during the Bo Xilai scandal.  There isn’t enough evidence to suggest whether such demonstration of incompetence has hurt the hardliners inside the party.  While it’s conceivable that they could use these two incidents to urge tougher repressive measures in the future, it’s hard to imagine that their political standing has increased as a result of the Chen story.

If anything, the Chen drama suggests that fear of repression is dissipating within China.  Chen escaped with the help of a network of friends and human rights activists, who risked their lives and liberty to spirit him away from danger and into the U.S. Embassy.  More remarkably, after the Chen story broke, many of the same activists fearlessly served as the conduit between Chen and the outside world, even though several of them were detained and beaten up by the police. For the Chinese Communist Party, this is perhaps the most worrisome development – long-repressed dissidents are less afraid to challenge the regime directly. To the extent that authoritarian regimes maintain power largely through fear, the loss of fear on the part of the opposition initially and the ordinary people afterwards is almost certain to portend a profound crisis.

Frankie Fook-lun Leung
July 3, 2012 at 05:32

where do Chinese leaders send their children for education?  Where do corrupt Chinese bureaucrats hide their money?  Where do corrupt Chinese bureaucrats send their wives and relatives to get foreign residence?  Why?

Frankie Fook-lun Leung
May 20, 2012 at 04:04

where do China’s princelings go when they want an education? The West. Where do the rich and corrupt in China send their money? The West. Do they go to the Soviet? I have not yet seen one lately.

Frankie Fook-lun Leung
May 13, 2012 at 07:56

Read Prof. Nye’s article. He was invited by Chinese universities to speak on soft-power. I was also invited by over forty universities, professional societies and returnees’ societies in china to give talks on the Anglo-American legal system. Am I or Prof. Nye selling snake oil?

Frankie Fook-lun Leung
May 13, 2012 at 07:50

For example, I teach swimmer’s life-saving. You ask me: don’t you see so many people swimming in the sea and so few got drowned, what do you teach life-saving? See the logic. May be you don’t.

Frankie Fook-lun Leung
May 13, 2012 at 06:39

I only exchange ideas as an academic and don’t not trade personal insults. I taught Chinese law at Hong Kong University, Loyola Law School, Stanford Law School and University of Southern California law School. For your information and reference.

John Chan
May 12, 2012 at 02:41

@Frankie Fook-lun Leung,
Have you heard of try try and try again? Chinese does not expect free lunch, they are not like the people in the Westpac nations who expect to live beyond their means as entitlement. China understands it needs work very hard in order to get messages across to the arrogant and closed-minded westerners.

After 200 years relentless lying Westerners surely make you believe their lies about democracy and human rights despite the facts are shown otherwise. Presenting the true oneself is not myopic and self-centered view of persuasion; not accepting Westerner’s word as given truth is not propaganda engineering; reining in Westpac proxies to protect one’s sovereignty is the right of any nation; and indeed People’s eyes are crystal clear, they can see through the wrapping the snakeoil salesman presented no matter how nicely it is packaged.

Frankie Fook-lun Leung
February 11, 2014 at 13:07

You areconfusing bullying technique and chauvinism with persuasion. It does not work . Look at the environmental pollution, corruption , ;ack of food security and moral decade in China.

John Chan
May 12, 2012 at 01:15

@Frankie Fook-lun Leung,
Isn’t the ever-increasing FDI in China the answer you need regarding the protection of contractual rights in China?

What kind of lawyer and lecturer you are? Don’t you know research is the fundamental work of a creditable lawyer and lecturer?

John Chan
May 12, 2012 at 01:04

@Frankie Fook-lun Leung,
With your unrelenting baseless smearing, no wonder the Westerner can smear China outrageously without fear. If China goes down, you are guaranteed to be returned to the status before WWI, you can forget about human rights all together. Go to learn how Chinese was mistreated before WWI dude.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment

Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief