Fifty years ago, on the morning of October 20, 1962, China’s People’s Liberation Army assaulted Indian military positions along their disputed frontier. The Chinese attack, justified domestically and abroad as self-defense, resulted in the only major armed conflict in modern times between the world’s two most populous countries. The Indian military, poorly prepared and naively led, was routed. A second major Chinese assault the following month forced India’s Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru to write to President John F. Kennedy in desperation to request air support from the United States. Having brought India to its knees, Beijing declared a unilateral ceasefire on November 21, and the PLA withdrew to its pre-war positions.
This short but savage war, which resulted in over 2,000 fatalities, was fought just as the world’s eyes were fixated upon the nuclear stand-off between the United States and Soviet Union over the latter’s deployment of nuclear missiles to Cuba. That may partly explain why the war goes largely unnoticed today by strategic experts in the West and across the Asia-Pacific, including many Sinologists. But just as history is often written by the winners, it is rarely forgotten by the losers. The border conflict casts a long shadow over how India has perceived, and continues to perceive, Chinese intentions.
Despite the importance of Sino-Indian ties for the United States and other regional and global powers, that relationship is prone to much misinterpretation. Observers are often content to characterize relations between Beijing and New Delhi either as unbridled competition by two rising powers or sinister cooperation against the U.S.-led international order. The reality is in fact far more complex.
Fifty years after their border war, China and India remain locked in their dispute over territory the size of Greece, populated by well over a million people. It makes the disagreements over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands and the South China Sea Islands – both recently in the news – pale by comparison. The clash over the Sino-Indian frontier has complex origins, rooted in the non-demarcated boundaries of British India, differing interpretations of sovereignty, and the legitimacy of Chinese claims to Tibet. While border negotiations between Beijing and New Delhi continue periodically behind closed doors, Chinese and Indian maneuvering manifests itself publicly in subtle but deliberate shifts in policy concerning mundane activities such as military interactions, the printing of official maps, and the issuing of visas. While meaningful, such messaging is occasionally exaggerated by irresponsible and ill-informed members of the media in India and nationalist bloggers and commentators in China.
Yet for a number of reasons, the prospects of history repeating itself are slim. India is far better equipped today along virtually every dimension of military preparedness. In recent years, India has expanded its mountain warfare units, redeployed its most sophisticated fighter aircraft to its northeast, and enhanced its naval capabilities as a deterrent against possible Chinese adventurism. The presence and responsible stewardship of nuclear weapons by both sides has also contributed to stability. Additionally, China and India are increasingly economically interdependent, with China now among India’s largest trade partners and foreign investors, and India an important market and source of raw materials for Chinese manufacturers. And the international environment today is far more conducive for India, which now enjoys cooperative diplomatic, economic, and military relations with most major states in the international system.
Despite China’s rapid military modernization, ongoing leadership transition, and newfound assertiveness, New Delhi is reluctant to become part of any overtly anti-Chinese military alliance. It has cooperated closely with China, and against developed states, on several matters of multilateral diplomacy, notably climate change. Multilateral cooperation has also extended to the BRICS summit, the various ASEAN-centered multilateral groupings, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (of which India is an observer). But it would be a mistake to interpret any such tactical cooperation as the emergence of a Sino-Indian bloc that seeks to undermine the power and influence of the United States and its allies.
As recollections of the 1962 war linger, policymakers and commentators across the Asia-Pacific and in the West would do well to understand that the episode still colors relations between the two rising giants. India continues to pursue fruitful economic and diplomatic relations with China and shares many of Beijing’s concerns about its development trajectory, fragile sovereignty, and representation at various international high tables. But the unresolved territorial dispute and the residual memory of Beijing’s assertiveness will ensure that India hedges its bets on China’s peaceful rise. The rest of the world would do well to take notice.
Dhruva Jaishankar is a Transatlantic Fellow with the Asia Program of the German Marshall Fund of the United States in Washington D.C.
Reddit
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Technorati
Yahoo
Google
Plurk
Fancy Liu
The war has always been the trick that the politician carry out their political intention by sacrificing the benefit of the civilians. Peace and development are the main topic in current society. I would like china becoming more powerful in economy than in political. If our life can improve significantly, anything else is more meaningful for us?
Indian
China is the worst country ever in the history of world. China is also a very big cheater country who cheated with India in1962's war by attaching on it all of sudden. China is enemy of the entire world not only India
Sri Lankan
On the Contrary, India is the worst enemy of the whole of South Asia…!..Creating terror to destablilize all neighbouring states, and finally intervening to maintain India`s dominancy in external affairs of that state…!…China is a friend in need to us Sri Lankans, Pakistanis, Bengalis and Nepalese…!..India, actually, is the Enemy…!
ariel
John Chan on one side and the whole world on the other side. Fellow readers and bloggers, please appreciate the fact that Chan was released from a rehab center/mental asylum to defend and espouse China's cause in cyberspace. The war of words is similar to the WWII which was fought between the Allied Powers on one side and a mad man called Hitler on the other. Here is one mad cap who wants the entire world to see and interpret history through Communist China's prism and anything contrary is perceived to be imperialistic and in furtherance of Western agenda. One opium shot and Johnny's comments go ballistic. And one should not forget the fact that he earns 20 cents per comment which enables him to buy a bit of his opium.
graham irish
@JC – again with the handbook. The Irish in the british empire were deprived of voting rites, ruled by an elite, denied land rites, did not have freedom of religon or expression, used as cannon fodder, while they died from starvation and disease. All this while making their masters rich. The british empire was run pretty much the same way the chinese elite run china. We were nobodies in our own country pretty much the same as you are nobody in yours. You cant even move around in your own country in the same problem free way as we in the west can. Your opinions are not of your own, they are the product of your political,social and educational indoctrination. Try to google the new york times today, you see they only let you know what they want you to think….
graham irish
@Chan- your adept at spinning history,probably your reading some anti imperialist government handbook of suitable quotes. Its china that has imperialist idea's and its quite disturbing. My country was under imperialist control for over 800 years, its ingrained in the irish dna to smell a bully nation, and china is stinking to high heaven. Every country in your region is concerned about china's now relentless claims, its arbitary citizens imbargo on japenese goods, and its yearning for its rightfull place as the worlds supreme power. In time i think there will be an asian equivalent of Nato, so as to curtail your imperialist ambition. Germany, Japan and the Soviet Union learned you cant take the world on….
John Chan
@graham irish,
I doubt you have ever learnt anything from those 800 years of English suppression. You are mere regurgitating what the imperialists have been doing all along, presuming morality then accusing the victims with perjury on the moral high ground. British is good at it, American, largely Irish, born out of British is out-doing the British like a butterfly transformed from a caterpillar.
Yes, you are right, there would be an Asian Nato in time; turning Asia into a powder keg is European’s eternal desire like what they did to Balkan, Middle East, Africa, …
BTW, the Irish shouldn’t feel too bitter against the English, without the English the Irish can’t repay their 800 years humiliation to the English as an American; on top of that, the Irish benefited quite a lot in the British empire as part of the ruling class to exploit the colonies.
Errol
JC, you'r making yourself look foolish again. Do you even know the demographics of modern-day America? Do you even know what percentage of the population are the descendants of the Irish immigrants? You're forgetting that there were other waves from Scotland, England, France, Italy, Germany, Eastern Europe, Africa, and more during the early centuries of America's history?
Saying that Americans are largely Irish in ancestry… well, I leave that to the others what to think of that.