The Interview: Boeing Talks
Image Credit: Boeing

The Interview: Boeing Talks "Silent Eagle"

0 Likes
9 comments

After publishing A ‘Stealth’ Showdown in South Korea, which detailed the various aircraft vying for South Korea's FX-III prize, we were flooded with questions regarding the various competitors. We have reached out to Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Eurofighter to answer the most popular questions you asked over email, social media, and our comments board.

The Diplomat's Harry Kazianis spoke with Boeing's F-X Campaign Director Howard Berry regarding the F-15 Silent Eagle.

(Editor's Note: We are awaiting replies from Lockheed Martin and Eurofighter.)

1. The Diplomat recently ran a featured story concerning South Korea's FX-III fighter competition. Our readers were very excited concerning the entry of Boeing's F-15 Silent Eagle fighter. We received multiple emails, comments and requests for more information. One of the more repeated questions was a history of the Silent Eagle project. Obviously there is linkage to original F-15. How did the program come about? What are some of the goals of the program? How similar is the Silent Eagle to older versions of the F-15?

The Silent Eagle was designed in response to the needs expressed by current international F-15 operators. Silent Eagle builds on a continuous evolution of capability in the combat-proven F-15 family of aircraft with a bundle of additional advancements that allow us to offer a “2-Aircraft-in-1 Platform” solution that brings an unprecedented balance of survivability and lethality to meet customer needs in all phases of air combat.

2. The F-15 Silent Eagle obviously has some major competition from various competent and modern fighters such as the F-35 and the Eurofighter. In what ways does the F-15 SE stand out? How is the F-15 SE superior in your view to the competition?

Boeing’s progressive evolutionary-design approach positions us to offer our Republic of Korea customer a highly capable, yet low-risk and affordable Silent Eagle F-X solution on a schedule that will meet ROK requirements. From a capability perspective, what truly distinguishes Silent Eagle from every modern multi-role fighter in production today is its ability to have its airframe configuration tailored in the field thereby ensuring optimized performance of the aircraft in a wide array of missions. The platform can be flown in a stealthy configuration in the early days of a conflict when the battlespace is contested. Once airspace dominance has been achieved, the Silent Eagle can be flown in a configuration optimized for weapon payload capacity.

We have also offered a comprehensive offset package that addresses all of the ROK’s F-X priority areas including F-X Logistics, F-X Technology Transfer and F-X Parts Manufacture, as well as Technology Transfer to support Korea’s next-generation KF-X program. Boeing has been a partner to the Republic of Korea for more than a half century and in that time Korean industry has played a vital role across Boeing military and commercial airplane programs. We look forward to the opportunity a ROK Government acquisition of Silent Eagle would give us to further strengthen and extend the relationships as Korean industry continues its rapid advancement in the global aerospace and defense supply chain.

3. The F-15 SE is considered by many as a 4.5 generation fighter. It would compete presumably against a field of 5th generation fighters fielded by Russia, China and possibly others. How is Boeing preparing the Silent Eagle to compete against such airframes of the future?

I challenge you to define 5th generation. The definition seems to change on a daily basis, depending on who you’re talking to. We prefer not to use the generational distinction. Silent Eagle is designed to meet current and emerging customer requirements for improved survivability through enhanced situational awareness, stand-off weapons and reduced Radar Cross Section. Silent Eagle offers these capabilities and features via a mature, low-risk production program and in an affordable, proven aircraft type. The Silent Eagle has range, payload, and versatility advantages that others do not. Furthermore, we recognize that threats faced by Silent Eagle will continue to evolve in the decades ahead. Silent Eagle is uniquely capable in its growth potential given its excess capacity of payload, volume, cooling, power, computer memory and computer throughput thereby well positioning Silent Eagle for incorporation of new advanced systems over the life of its airframe.

4. What types of missions can the F-15 Silent Eagle be expected to perform? What do you consider the airplanes greatest strengths overall? How much is stealth an important asset to the airframe of the SE?

Silent Eagle is designed with advanced technologies that provide the warfighter an unprecedented ability to tailor the platform airframe to best meet the specific needs of the combat mission. For missions in highly-contested airspace requiring enhanced survivability, Silent Eagle can perform missions in its low-signature “silent” configuration. For combat missions requiring carriage of increased payloads, Silent Eagle can also fly with a traditional “heavy” weapons load that surpasses its contemporaries. Taking a balanced-survivability design approach, we have brought the requisite reduction in radar signature to thrive and survive in the Northeast Asian battlespace both today and for many decades to come while not trading away capabilities in the name of a single mission.

5. Consider the cost of a modern fighter jet, many governments investing in such a plane have expressed interests in upgradeability. Is the F-15 Silent Eagle capable of upgrades over its lifespan? What improvements over time could you see being integrated or being requested into the aircraft?

While nobody can predict the future, it is clear that those combat aircraft that can readily and affordably introduce new systems and capabilities will be best positioned to maintain a quality military edge over the ever-evolving threats. We have designed the Silent Eagle with that vision of evolutionary capability growth in mind. While numerous improved systems can be envisioned for the future, we believe that there is a high likelihood of continued advancements of sensor and weapon systems. With Silent Eagle’s designed-in growth capacity, its operators will be able to readily and affordably integrate such evolved systems.

6. Various versions of the F-15 have been deployed all over the world. As nations look at the cost of deploying newer versions of fighter aircraft, many governments have taken the path of upgrading their aircraft. Is there any option for current owners of the F-15 to upgrade to the capabilities of the Silent Eagle?

Boeing continually works with the U.S. Air Force and other F-15 customers looking at airframe and system upgrades that will ensure the F-15’s tactical relevance and airspace dominance. Silent Eagle brings a suite of capability elements to the F-15 aircraft. Many of these capability elements could be readily introduced into fielded F-15 aircraft currently in service around the globe.

Comments
9
johnTdownunderinBKK
August 20, 2013 at 23:15

Interesting points, PeterDownUnder. The problem with the F-35 is simple, evolving cost increases and lengthy developement delays going into full production. You simple can’t engender customer confidence with having an especially suffisticated platform such as the F-35, going into full production and still be in the developement phase. It doesn’t seem to be an effective way to operate. These two issues, I believe, will sway the South Koreans to go for a known platform that already exists. Namely, the F-15SE. The beauty of the F-15SE, is that, it also has the potential to be like the latest Sukhois, in that, the F-15SE could b fitted with thrust vectoring 2D nozzles. What an added bonus that would have as a selling point, compared to the now very costly F-35. I think that the Australia Govt. is now firmly and fully locked up and in to the F-35. Pardon the pun. I just hope that we can afford it and the ongoing delays, ongoing issues, and the ongoing costs that are sure to follow. There is still time to look at the options.

johnTdownunderinBKK
August 20, 2013 at 23:01

Interesting points, PeterDownUnder. The problem with the F-35 is simple, evolving cost increases and lengthy developement delays going into full production. You simple can’t engender customer confidence with having an especially suffisticated platform such as the F-35, going into full production and still be in the developement phase. It doesn’t seem to be an effective way to operate. These two issues, I believe, will sway the South Koreans to go for a known platform that already exists. Namely, the F-15SE. The beauty of the F-15SE, is that, it also has the potential to be like the latest Sukhois, in that, the F-35SE could be easily fitted with thrust vectoring 2D nozzles. What an added bonus that would have as a selling point, compared to the now very costly F-35. I think that the Australia Govt. is now firmly and fully locked up and in to the F-35. Pardon the pun. I just hope that we can afford it and the ongoing delays, ongoing issues, and the ongoing costs that are sure to follow. There is still time to look at the options.

Tyler
February 7, 2013 at 09:53

no not really

Pseudonym
December 15, 2012 at 16:38

Isn't the critical question here the size of the Silent Eagle's radar cross section? If it's comparable to the F-35 then it seems obvious that the F-15SE is a better option. If it's more along the lines of the Eurofighter or worse then it's very questionable that it would be the best option. Given all the compromises that went into the F-35 in order to make it stealthy, though, why would it be the plane it is if a few simple updates to the F-15 airframe could achieve the same level of stealth? (Or more importantly, if the F-15SE's miracle stealth technology could be applied to the F-16?)

You cant kid us
November 24, 2012 at 23:57

The euro fighter will wipe the floor with them all and you know it

spektre
November 19, 2012 at 09:14

Winterborn that's a great point and like anything else, from the simplest household good to the latest combat plane it's all about the money plus a gamble when you either try to sell a brand x or y product and it very well applies to this plane.Even with the F-15SE nice host of features, the F35 could still win but like you said the F35 is plagued with problems and it does even show or have more problems than the F22 on it's early stages of being deployed as a frontline fighter.Like I said before the F15 is a proven plane almost a staple on friendly nations to USA and I agree with you that the South Koreans would do wrong going for the F35 because the time to train a pilot and ground crew or the learning curve for the F35 is awful compared to the F15SE which is way shorter and more flexible for the pilots and ground crew.

spektre
November 18, 2012 at 04:03

Time and again the F15 has proven itself to be a formidable aircraft with many adavanced capabilities even when other nations were merely talking about 4g the F15 was already being rolled out during the 70's and forward as the mainstay 4g US fighter for many years until this point and like Mr. Howard Berry said, is not a simple matter of 4g or 5g fighter anymore it's a matter of winning conflicts in the Low-Intensity-Conflict arena which means keep it short and win fast I'm a naval veteran and even though the F15 is not carrier based, the suite is now carrying puts it in a 4.5+++ generation making it a highly capable and enduring aircraft with a very modern modular architecture that will keep it at the front now and for years to come making the F15 a cost efficient alternative plus being a combat proven aircraft I believe the other option that remains for South Korea is not the EF2000 but rather the Rafale but seems is not on this bid for some reason.

Winterborn
November 17, 2012 at 07:46

I think that many countries quite sick of the F-35 poroblems could consider this aircraft. That is assuming it is just not a marketing game

PeterDownUnder
November 15, 2012 at 23:05

Just as Aus Air Power analysed most 4th generation fighter jets would be on par to one another depending on the updates made to them.
F-35s are deemed to be inferior to 4th gen fighters with the latest mods in radar and armament. F-15s upgraded to the latest everything will be an attractive option for S Korea as well as the option to upgrade their existing F-15s. But it seems the Eurofighter has offered better technology transfer offers than Boeing has so thats probably another negotiating issue.
I reckon S Korea will definetly either go with the F-15s or the F-35. The other participants are just cards to use in their negotiation with the US companies. Just think of how many billions US Forces Korea spends for Korea. It would be politically disastrous/impossible for SK to purchase foreign military fighter jets besides the US.
F-35 just still remains a great big mystery for everyone. The first trillion dollar plane, will it be all that it promised or a catastrophic failure.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
required
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment
required

Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief