On November 25, RFE/RL’s Tajik Service — known locally as Radio Ozodi — reported that President Emomali Rahmon’s third daughter, Rukhshona Rahmonova, had been appointed a deputy head of the foreign ministry’s international organizations department. The day before, the ministry had updated its staffing structure and Rahmonova’s name appeared. A source within the ministry confirmed to RFE/RL that Rahmonova had been appointed “some 10 days ago,” but the change had not been publicized. Rukhshona, according to the foreign ministry source, has previously worked in Tajikistan’s London embassy.
A president appointing his children to government posts is always a newsworthy event, and more so in Tajikistan because Rahmon has made it a habit. His son, Rustam, ran the customs service from 2013 to 2015 when he was appointed head of the state’s anticorruption agency. Another of Rahmon’s daughters, Ozoda, was elevated to the president’s chief of staff after serving as deputy foreign minister. RFE/RL carried versions of the story about Rukhshona’s appointment in Tajik, Russian, and English.
According to RFE/RL the foreign ministry called the Tajik Service on November 25 and threatened to revoke the accreditation of the service’s Dushanbe-based journalists if the story was not taken down in five minutes.Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.
Given that the story was based on an official government website (which is still up) listing the staff of the foreign ministry, including Rukhshona, as a deputy department head, and was corroborated by a source, the news agency declined to remove the story. RFE/RL says it had been asked earlier in November to remove a different story, which it also declined to do.
The foreign ministry revoked the accreditation of six Dushanbe-based RFE/RL correspondents on November 25. According to RFE/RL, the six correspondents weren’t even involved with the story about Rukhshona.
In a statement, RFE/RL President Thomas Kent said, “We are outraged by this action by the Tajik government which is a blatant attack on our ability to do our jobs as journalists.”
The U.S. Embassy in Tajikistan, which has been slow to speak too loudly against Dushanbe’s abuses in the past, issued a response on November 29 expressing “concern over the cancelation of accreditations of six journalists from Radio Ozodi.”
The statement goes on to stress the importance of journalists to a democratic society, and call on Tajik authorities “to ensure that journalists have the right to freedom of expression and to hold opinions without interference in accordance with Tajikistan’s international obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.”
RFE/RL — a U.S. government-funded broadcasting organization — has been the target of authoritarian ire throughout Central Asia. Its websites have been blocked in a number of states — Tajikistan since September 2015, for example — and its correspondents and staff (and their family members) threatened and abused.
Local journalists working with regional services are often accused of being “unpatriotic” because the stories they report make the state look bad.
Soltan Achilova, a 67-year old Turkmen correspondent has been attacked three times in the past month alone. On November 8, two women approached Achilova, reportedly screaming that her work was meant to “pour dirt on Turkmenistan.”
“It’s never been easy being a journalist in Central Asia. Quite the opposite, in fact,” Bruce Pannier, a long-time Central Asia watcher who works for RFE/RL wrote, introducing a podcast on the topic. “Reporting from Central Asia can lead to dire consequences: assaults, arrests, imprisonment, and, on occasion, even death.”
While resting on government funding is far from ideal for any media organization, if not for RFE/RL, very little reporting on Central Asia would happen at all. The local services are especially critical. Indigenous outlets experience even greater pressure and abuse. They disappear suddenly and quietly.
EurasiaNet recently reported on regional journalists dropping their pens, doubly crushed by economic forces troubling newspapers everywhere and also by state governments, which view them as far from necessary for a functioning society.