China Holds Key to Climate Change
Image Credit: David Schroeter

China Holds Key to Climate Change


For the past two decades, international climate change negotiations have been marred by a North-South split. With the conclusion of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Durban at the end of last year, the first cornerstone was laid for increased global cooperation. The actual architecture of meaningful long-term action remains elusive, however, as global governance finds itself preoccupied with other geopolitical and economic trials. Indeed, it will be China and the world’s largest carbon emitters – not U.N. summits – that determine the nature of the climate challenge in the immediate years ahead.

To be sure, a number of symbolic successes were achieved in Durban. The Kyoto Protocol was extended into a second phase that will begin in 2013, the Green Climate Fund was endorsed as the primary vehicle to support low-carbon investment in the developing world, and the “Durban Platform” was created to guide negotiations over a new climate regime that will cover both developed and developing countries by 2020.

Yet while Durban delegates worked diligently to save the process, it’s still uncertain whether the environment will be an equal beneficiary. The parties that will participate in the second Kyoto Protocol commitment period account for only around 15 percent of global emissions. Additionally, the $100 billion Green Climate Fund is still a mostly empty vessel, with the United States insisting on a large role for private sector funding while least developed countries and small island states argue that their vulnerability demands robust funding from developed country governments. The Durban Platform promises an apparent denouement to years of disagreement over the nature of differentiated responsibilities, but the language is too ambiguous and the timeline too remote for the Platform to make any immediate dent in cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.  

Multilateralism is a time-intensive affair, but the world’s coal mines, cars, and consumption are unlikely to slow down as the diplomats deliberate. The International Energy Agency estimates that existing energy-related infrastructure is likely to lock the world in on a dangerous climate path unless there’s a serious course correction by 2017. As a new climate governance structure waits to be born, it’s an unlikely candidate to provide such immediate change. Instead, the international community will be watching China – the world’s largest carbon emitter since 2006 – to see how it manages its own domestic energy, economic, and environmental dynamics.

China’s twelfth Five Year Plan, for 2011 to 2015, includes a 17 percent carbon-intensity reduction target to support China’s broader international pledge to reduce emissions intensity by 40 percent to45 percent by 2020 relative to 2005. This goal is hardly ambitious – projections supplied by both the Paris-based International Energy Agency and the Beijing-based Energy Research Institute suggest that this is already the business-as-usual emissions trajectory.

Michael Guy
February 1, 2013 at 20:15

carbon Dioxide only comprises 0.0037 of the air. This miniscule amount of gaseous plant metabolite is not responsible for all climate catastrophes. The regulation and restriction on emissions is just a way for politicians, bureaucrats and plutocrats with a Marxist monopoly to achieve Lenin's dream of controlling the means of production via controlling the means of combustion.  western government will issue carbon ration cards and then sell these permission slips using wall street firms or Al Gore.  This will drive up costs of good produced in the West making Chinese goods more competitive.  The West will have higher unemployment and lower industrial output while China profits.  The EPA and environmentalist are just propagandist for China.  Wall street, Government bureaucracies and Beijing will benefit from this ruse, we will go towards greater poverty,

March 26, 2012 at 15:53

As a very close tag of the environmental issues, I think of the main challenges the very large desert lands face most of African countries and small parts of others. This is one of the key driving factors in Africa which has also spread various conflicts and upraisings which have been sweeping many countries there. These could further cause most people are being unafordable to improve and sustain their economic lifes and sequentially being too fragile to trigger conflicts easily to occur. So all related institutions must initiate future plans and programs to tackle this most striking issues there.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment

Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief