Not Rising, But Rejuvenating: The "Chinese Dream"  (Page 2 of 3)

This goal is hardly unique to Xi Jinping. Indeed, the explicit goal of rejuvenation goes at least as far back as Sun Yet-sen, and has been invoked by almost every modern Chinese leader from Chiang Kai-Shek to Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. In this way, leaders have used national rejuvenation as a grand goal to mobilize the Chinese population to support the revolution or reforms they launched. In making these efforts, they have helped transform China into the modern and more powerful nation it is today. Far from weakening their resolve, however, China’s impressive new achievements have only strengthened its citizens’ commitment to achieving the Chinese Dream.

It bears noting that the Chinese Dream is in many ways the polar opposite of the more widely understood American Dream. Specifically, whereas the American Dream emphasizes individuals attaining personal enrichment and success, the Chinese Dream is a collective undertaking that calls upon Chinese citizens to make personal sacrifices in order to serve the greater, national good. If there is an appropriate parallel in the U.S. it would not be the American Dream but President John F. Kennedy’s appeal to the American people to “ask not what your country can do for you–ask what you can do for your country.”

Although the meaning of the Chinese Dream is practical and intuitively understood at home, it has the unfortunate consequence of remaining opaque to non-Chinese. Given that the Chinese Dream is deeply rooted in history— in particular on China’s interpretation of history which may differ in crucial ways from Japan or the United States’ own teachings of that history—there is an unavoidable chasm between how China perceives the Chinese Dream and how foreign audiences do. Not only do many non-Chinese lack a strong understanding of Chinese history, but many are not accustomed to drawing such a strong connection between historical events and current affairs.

This varying historical consciousness of different countries creates a perception gap. One need only look at the differences between how Chinese and Japanese students learn important historic events. For example, whereas Chinese students learn all the details about the Sino-Japanese War, Japanese history textbooks contain very little information on the war, so younger generations do not know much about that part of history. Thus, the Chinese and Japanese have contrasting views over the Diaoyu/Senkakus. The Chinese youth are emotional in regard to the territorial dispute because they connect the current standoff with past humiliations, but the Japanese consider these completely separate issues. The Japanese indifference towards historical issues in turn further infuriates the Chinese.

These different historical memories have caused misperceptions between China and some of its neighbors over other sovereignty issues. For example, it seems inconceivable to the Philippines and Vietnam that China’s historical evidence of sovereignty over islands in the South China Sea should take precedent over modern international law. Consequently, these countries and others perceive China’s claims and efforts to defend them as inherently aggressive, and in turn demonstrate that China is a revisionist power.

David Lloyd-Jones
May 17, 2013 at 21:40

K Ballard writes "Understanding China and its ambitions could be as simple as translating the characters for it's name more correctly. 中国 could mean middle kingdom…"

 Right.  And the sun never set on the British Empire for reasons obvious to anyone who remembers that the other name for the UK is "Great" Britain.

This is wonderful — but can Ballard explain to us how America had a civil war, when the ral name for the country is the "United" States?

 Pity that. He had a really great theory gong for a while…



[...] At first pass, this article seems to be yet another editorial swipe at Japan. It ignores the growing number of calls by Indian nationalists for the government to take a more aggressive stance on the issue while  lambasting Japanese society as an inherently aggressive one poised to take Chinese territory. There is nothing new in this approach; China often tries to portray itself as a victim of Japan’s nationalism  within the Diaoyu/Senkaku dispute. And the PRC makes no secret of its view that Japan is a declining power. All of this fits within the official narrative of a peaceful China attempting to defend its territorial integrity from a region increasingly wary of its return to greatness. [...]

[...] Since taking over as party chairman Xi Jinping has repeatedly invoked the theme of the “Chinese Dream,” which heralds “the great revival of the Chinese nation.” [...]

[...] Since taking over as party chairman Xi Jinping has repeatedly invoked the theme of the “Chinese Dream,” which heralds “the great revival of the Chinese nation.” [...]

[...] Since taking over as party chairman Xi Jinping has repeatedly invoked the theme of the “Chinese Dream,” which heralds “the great revival of the Chinese nation.” [...]

[...] Since taking over as party chairman Xi Jinping has repeatedly invoked the theme of the “Chinese Dream,” which heralds “the great revival of the Chinese nation.” [...]

Bill Rich
March 4, 2013 at 07:12

What does facts and truth have anything to do with Chinese understanding of history ? It is political expedience that matters.

Bill Rich
March 4, 2013 at 07:07

You can talk for days about the last 160 years of why China needs rejuvenation. But to understand the Chinese “dream”, you have to rewind Chinese history way back when China was the top dog. Especially when China dominated the then known-to-China war by beating, killing, evacuating every nationalities around China, during Qing, Tang, Han and earlier dynasties. Count the number of tribes eliminated, literally.

March 29, 2014 at 05:25

just like how the settlers from europe came to america and wiped out the indigenous native indians + slavery trade of africans right? Classic definition of the pot calling the kettle black. What human group on earth which has achieved a level of power, hasn’t caused harm to one group or another?

March 29, 2014 at 05:26

count the number of indian tribes eliminated, literally.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment

Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief