In a move that prompted a swift and angry response from China, the U.S. has reportedly agreed to substantially increase its military presence in the Philippines, increasing the number of troops, aircraft and ships which routinely rotate through the country.
Details surrounding the scale of the increase were not made public but Pio Lorenzo Batino, the Philippines deputy defense minister said policy consultations were also held on a framework that would allow Washington to bolster military equipment in-country as well. He warned that, "There has been no discussion yet on specifics [of in-country military equipment] … (these are) policy consultations and the specifics would be determined by the technical working groups,"
Batino went on to say they expected to sign a five-year joint U.S.-Philippine military exercise plan during their meetings recently.
The announcement came during the 3rd Philippines-United States Bilateral Strategic Dialogue in Manila last week. The 2nd bilateral dialogue was held in January of this year, and “Two-Plus-Two” Ministerial Consultations between their foreign and defense secretaries took place in April in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. side of the strategic dialogue was headed by U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell who told reporters afterwards that the long-standing U.S.-Philippines relationship was enjoying a “renaissance” as part of the larger U.S. pivot to Southeast Asia.
Meanwhile, tensions over conflicting territorial claims in the South China Sea continues to dominate relations between China and members of the Associations of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN).
The Philippines, Vietnam, China, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei have overlapping claims to the Spratly islands located in the far southeast of the South China Sea, also known as the West Philippine Sea and East Sea in Vietnam, which also claims the Paracel Islands off its northeast coast.
China claims sovereignty over much of the region including the resource rich islands and sea lanes of communications through which almost half the world's international trade passes.
Increased U.S. support would also serve The Philippines when struggling against natural disasters, which occur quite frequently. Typhoon Bopha was the most recent, claiming more than 900 lives as it swept across the southern Philippines last week.
Both Manila and Washington seemed to emphasis the humanitarian nature of the increased U.S. presence in the country, likely in an effort to assuage China’s inevitable concerns.
If this was the hope it was not to be realized as Beijing immediately focused on the strategic implications and the potential conflict, rather than the natural disaster relief operations. State-run media in Beijing denounced the agreement and used language that was unusually evocative, reflecting China’s growing frustration with the Philippines.
The China Daily referred to the Philippines as a troublemaker seeking a confrontation with China, and accused it of opportunism and trickery. It also described Philippines Foreign Minister Albert del Rosario’s public support of Japan building up its military forces as pathetic.

zanzibar
From north to south, east to west, the US claims vital and strategic interests to interfere negatively in the affairs of soverign nations. Their military bases infest the planet like bumps on the face of a leper….they foment rebellions, instigate wars, support despots and rogue states, militarize the planet, imprison massively the weak and defenseless in their own country, torture and kill at will.
Honestly, can this really continue?
Cyrus
Oh, and it was the despotic Peoples Republic of China that the US helped and gave the UN seat originally from the Republic of China.
Horso
Zanaibar, are you really serious. No one on the face of this planet compares to Mao for the systematic murder of his own people. Hitler and Joe Stalin didn't even come close, although I must admit they tried.
China's claim on the South China Sea is no more than a land grab and it cannot be allowed to happen. What next they will be claiming the whole Pacific Ocean and annexing all of South East Asia.
The Philippines has the right to defend it EEZ and China has no right to claim the South China Sea and impede on freedom of navigation.
The US has made mistakes, Iraq was a big one and as far as Afganistan goes, September 11 was an act of war. George Bush should have just nuked them it would have saved a lot of US and allied lives.
I am an Australian and my countrymen and I will stand at the back of the US anytime.
Whichwaydidhegogeorge?
"The chinese & the americans, you'll find that chinese with 5000 to 6000 years of civilizations never invaded any country."
You are the dumb. Try selling that story to someone in Tibet, South Korea, or Vietnam ya baldfaced liar. They'll laugh in your lying face.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_invasions
amador
Just find any war or problem in the world & you'll find the fingerprints of U.S Imperialism & its allies like NATO & Zionists/Israel! By the same token,look around & you will never find Chines to make any trouble at all. They are friendly & making business in bilatheral & fair as much as possible. in conterary,the U.S wants everything for itself. If you give youe finger,will bite your hand totally.By looking the history of the two nations,The chinese & the americans, you'll find that chinese with 5000 to 6000 years of civilizations never invaded any country,but US with 250-300 years of history has made maney coups, war,invations,killing,bombing innocent people ,committed crimes against humanity,etc,etc!
My advice to filipinos is break up wiith Us,be friend with your neighbours like China.
Remeber after the erruption ov vulcano in 80's in the Philippines,the Yankees run away & left you alone & did not extent any helping hand.when it was necessery for them,they used you & your people.the had clark air base in angeles city & naval base in olangapo.they oped bars & brought VD (vietnam rose) & exploited filipinas for their soldiers! the lists of crimes of American goes on & on. so, think wisely & be friend with your friends,not with your enemy,the US yankees!
PS, I am neither chines,nor supporter of china.Only based on the reallity that exists & we see it every single day by own bare eyes the crimes committed by Americans in Iraq,Afganistan,Libya & now Syria the latest.So,refer to history & don't listen to the rulling calss that are corrupted from top to bottom!
Richard
Let me get this straight. The U.S. which defeated the Japaneese Empire which had conquered China in WWII is the problem? If the nations of the world would lay down their arms tomorrow there would be peace. If the US, Israel, and other Jewish-Christians nations laid down their arms, tomorrow they would all be dead. It's your type of thinking that caused WWII. Retink your position and perhaps give us a chance to avoid WWIII.
Errol
With all due respect, you're practicing Chinese Exceptionalism. "will never find Chines to make any trouble at all". Have you forgotten the events earlier this year? Scarborogh Shoal? Mischief Reef? Going back farther in history, don't forget the border conflict with Vietnam and India. Then there's the occupation of Xinjiang and Tibet.
Would you really rather pick China over the US? If you were a leftist, China is a natural choice. For some reason, leftists seem to be all anti-US. Not pro-Filipino. Anti-US. THere's a difference between the two. Pro-Filipinos choose the best for Filipinos. Anti-US don't care who they sacrfice as long as they get to have one up over the US.
As I said before, culturally, we seem to be better off with the Americans. Our people who migrated to the US are now part of American society and have even been elected to the corridors of power. Our people serve in their armed forces and work in their companies. In the last '5000' years of Chinese civilizations, how many Filipinos have accomplished the same in China? It's a good place to visit, but we can't live there.
I would say you will rail against the injustices Americans heaped upon us at this point. To be stuck with them is your prerogative. Just keep in mind that not every American is out to get us. Same with Chinese too, to be fair. But let's talk about the governments. Whom would you rather choose? Look at how Beijing and Washington treat its own citizens. I'm not saying either is squeaky clean. I'm just saying which would you rather have, especially if you're an activist?
Cyrus
I am not a ruling class and I have a degree major in Political Science and minor in History. I would tell you that China has conquered during its history it started out as a single tiny kingdom known as Qin and it's first emperor Shih Huang Ti was able to expand it and other Dynasties thereafter was able to follow suite. Recent history would be the War with Vietnam, Tibet, and Russia regarding its common borders.
China is the same as any other Empires of the past nothing makes it different nor special in regards to other Empires from Persia to Rome.
nirvana
I can read history. I have read Chinese history, recorded by true historians. I have read how Qin Shi Huang the first Chinese Emperor invaded other countries, burned books, enslaved others. I have read how Mao destroyed his detractors and former fellows. I have read that even the Swiss did invade some neighbors, but most of the time they are truly peaceful people. And I have compared the size of Switzerland with that of China. And I can count the number official languages spoken in Switzerland.
PS: I am not living on planet earth. Just blogging here because in my far far away galaxy people are so boring. They don't fight. They don't tell lies.
phil
Yeah right you are not chinese heh? LOL 5000 years with invading any countries haha. Please educate history yourself from a neutral and trusted sources. Stay away from any books that are published by CCP because they are all lies.
phil
should read "without" invading any countries
Be Way
@phil,
The last time China was unified as a single nation is already more than 2,000 years ago. The last time both Tibet and Xinjiang were subjugated under the Mongol Dynasty rule was around 800 years ago. The last time Vietnam was ruled by Chinese Ming Dynasty was around 600 years ago. Since then, when and what has China ever invaded another sovereign nations.
However let us be honest that the West chiefly America, has never learn how to be civilized. The Europeans triggered and fought amongst themselves in both World Wars less than a century ago. What more the brutal occupation of Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan by Nato until now. On top they are eyeing more wars with Syria, Iran and even China now. Don't forget too the sins of pillaging, slavery and plundering of many countries around the globe as a result of colonization by Western Imperialist.
The West is a brutal vicious warmongering devil in disguise. Full stop.
Filipino Defenser
sorry the china threat is very real and we must do all that we can to stop china's ambitions its illusions of granduer of ruling the minds and bodies of the world
Grin Olsson
The Philippines was a former U.S. territory where the Scarborough Shoals was the U.S. Navy's firing range. If the Philippines relinquishes the Scarborough Shoals to China's demands, then China will have both the ability to monitor all ships both American and Filipino activity in Manila Bay, as well as target the city and ships in any future confrontation. The U.S. should have been in the Philippines yesterday – this is the only Christian value nation in the region and is America's only real natural ally.
Leonard R.
This is the correct answer. From a US national security point-of-view, the Philippines is the most important nation in the Far East. If PLAN ships control its western coast, US territories in the second island chain are vulnerable. That's why Panatag (Scarborough) is important. It is 120 nautical miles from Subic. And it's open sailing straight south to Darwin.
Beijing plans to start its conquest with the Philippines. It perceives Manila as its weakest foe. The seizing of the Scarborogh Shoal is necessary pour discourager les autres. So right now, ownership of those rocks looms very large to ASEAN, Australia, Guam and the rules-based order of the world.
The PLAN, as recently as August 2012, was interdicting Malaysian vessels, well inside the EEZ of Malaysia. If Beijing gets its way here, no nation's EEZ is safe. It's not just the Philippines that is at risk here.
Now…waiting for JC to tell us America is thousands of mles away, et cetera, et cetera.
phil
Is it just me? The new JC seems to be smarter.. Or at least he gives less impression that he is reading from script
Bertdel
If I were China, I would want my neighborhood divided and weak too. Much easier to deal with in this situation. If China continues to bully its neighbor and North Korea continues its march towards development of nuclear delivery system (e.g., ICBMs), I can foresee Japan and maybe even South Korea going nuclear. Going nuclear is the only way Japan can check China without depending on US security guarantees.
Now let's see what John Chan has to say.
John Chan
@Bertdel,
All independent nations have the right to defend themselves with means they see fit; China always support other nation to be independent and free from foreign interference. Whether Japan arms itself with nuclear bombs, aircraft carriers, subs, jets, etc., or allies itself with undesirable people, it is their decision.
“Divide and conquer” is a retarded mentality prevailing in the western culture which believes “if I cannot have it then nobody can have it.” Western culture definitely is the wrong track for a people does not have culture of its own to copy.
Yolvas
Well, clearly John Chan is a Chinese government spokerman. Just read his reply to Berdel's comment. I'd like to go little further on China Doctrine: it is not just what is mine is mine and what is yours is mine. Anything I can steal (even on cyberspace) rob, copy, fabricate, reverse engineer is mine. Since I have invented nothing in modern history worht of praise, (such as TV, radio, airplane, train, car, computer, etc), so I claim everything pre-modern as my invention. It is not just gunpowder, compas, paper and printing press are the four inventions I shamelessly claim as mine without any evidence. I also claim soccer ball and ice-cream as my inventions as well even though we Chinese never played soccer until 1990s and ate ice-cream around same time in our history. Well, you foolish Westerners believe in our fabricated stories and accept these are my investions without any questions anyway.
CLJF
@John Chan,
exemplary Chinese-style diplomacy you've displayed here.
nirvana
@CLJF,
May I point out that John Chan is among the privileged to represent "China diplomacy" here. He may be a representative of CCP-educated elite but certainly not examplary of any Chineseness. We have to break through the censorship before we can conclude as you stated.
Errol
Didn't Sun Tzu himself said that it is best to break the alliances of the enemy? Sun Tzu was not a Western writer. Thus the concept is not the West's alone. It's a universal concept.
a_canadian_observer
I read somewhere that Sun Tzu was not chinese, but was actually Korean….
Errol
"… as Beijing immediately focused on the strategic implications and the potential conflict, rather than the natural disaster relief operations."
Of course it wouldn't focus on the humanitarian aspect of anything. Brings to mind of the time when India rolled out it's new rocket, the one that could hit Beijing and other capitals in East Asia. You didn't hear anything from the other capitals, not even their media, but you can guess where the complaints about escalations came from.
DanPendleton
The China doctrine can be summarized thusly: "What is mine is mine. What is yours is ours."
John Chan
@DanPendleton,
Are you sure you are not talking about the essence of predatory imperialism of the West?
ariel
No Channy. He is talking about Chinese imperialism.
a_canadian_observer
Or Imperialism with chinese characteristic :).
Dan
@John
Pretty sure western policy is “What’s ours is ours. What’s yours, we’ve already had.”