China’s Fluid Ideology


The 90th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party on July 1 provided an opportunity for the party to defend its record – and for others to take stock of the evolution of its ideology since it first assumed power in 1949.

A look at the party’s various constitutions through the six decades since the creation of the People’s Republic of China is instructive. A constitution by definition is meant to be a permanent document, and while amendments can be made, they’re not supposed to be able to be made too easily. Yet, the Communist Party has had more than half a dozen constitutions, each of which claimed to provide the definitive guide to action for the party.

Before the party came to power—and indeed for years afterward—congresses were held sporadically until, beginning in the 1980s, they began to be held every five years.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

The first congress held after the party assumed power was in 1956, and the constitution issued at that time asserted: ‘The Communist Party of China takes Marxism-Leninism as its guide to action.’

‘Only Marxism-Leninism,’ it said, ‘correctly sets forth the laws of development of society and correctly charts the path leading to the achievement of socialism and communism.’

The next party congress was held 13 years later, at the height of the Cultural Revolution, after head of state Liu Shaoqi and Communist Party General Secretary Deng Xiaoping had both been overthrown. The new party constitution stated that: ‘The Communist Party of China takes Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tsetung Thought as the theoretical basis guiding its thinking. Mao Tsetung Thought is Marxism-Leninism of the era in which imperialism is heading for total collapse and socialism is advancing to worldwide victory.’

So, the party effectively redefined Marxism-Leninism as Mao Tsetung Thought—Marxism-Leninism for the current era.

Constitutions rarely include the names of the living, but this one did. In fact, it specified who the next leader of the Communist Party would be. Lin Biao, the constitution said, was Chairman Mao’s ‘closest comrade-in-arms and successor.’

Lin was killed in 1971 when his plane crashed while he was supposedly fleeing to the Soviet Union after a failed attempt to assassinate Mao. Naturally, then, the constitution naming him as the successor had to be changed. This was done in 1973, the year after the visit to Beijing by US President, Richard Nixon, when it became clear that China was traveling a new path.

But this constitution didn’t last long either. Mao died in 1976 and, the following year, while Hua Guofeng was chairman and premier, a new party congress adopted another new constitution. Here, Mao Thought was defined as ‘the guiding ideology and theoretical basis of the Communist Party of China.’

But eventually, Deng was able to outmaneuver Hua, removing him first as premier – a post given to Zhao Ziyang – and then divesting him of the party chairmanship. Hua was succeeded in that post by Hu Yaobang.

A new party congress had to be held to legitimize this new leadership and, of course, another new party constitution was unveiled. But even though by now Mao had been dead for six years, the 1982 constitution still stated that: ‘The Communist Party of China takes Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought as its guide to action.’

A party plenum held the previous year explained that Mao Zedong Thought wasn’t actually the chairman’s individual thinking, but the collective wisdom of the party. Hence, even though Mao was no longer alive, his thought would continue to develop.

Although ordinary people may not care much about ideology, from the party’s standpoint, it has to justify changes in policy ideologically. What the party did after Mao’s death was to abandon his policy of unending class struggle within the country and the support of revolution around the world.

Deng reversed Mao’s policies by focusing on economic development, and to do this he had to transform the party’s ideology. Actually, from 1978 on, Deng became China’s new strongman and his thinking came to replace Mao Thought. He also introduced the concept of ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics,’ noting that since national conditions are different in each country, the socialism being practiced would also need to be integrated into a country’s actual conditions.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief