Superpower Denied? Why China's 'Rise' May Have Already Peaked
Image Credit: Wikicommons

Superpower Denied? Why China's 'Rise' May Have Already Peaked


If dating the rise and decline of great powers is tricky, pinpointing the peaking of a rising power is almost hopeless.  One obvious problem is the measurement of power.  Shall we look at the size of a country’s economy or its level of wealth? Should we also consider the momentum and sustainability of its growth?  Is its external environment a legitimate variable to include in calculating its power since any country’s power is relative to that of its potential adversaries?

These are the questions to bear in mind when we tackle an important real-world problem: Has China’s rise peaked?

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

If one were to pose this question a few years ago, he would probably be laughed out of the room.  The conventional wisdom then was that China’s rise was certain to continue.  But today, this question is very much on everyone’s mind.

What has changed?

Almost everything.

If one has to take a position, it may be reasonable to argue that the Beijing Olympics in 2008 symbolically marked the peaking of Chinese power.  Everything began to go downhill afterwards.  Caught up in the global economic crisis, the Chinese economy has never fully recovered its momentum.  To be sure, Beijing’s stimulus package of 2008-2009, fueled by deficit spending and a proliferation of credit, managed to avoid a recession and produce one more year of double-digit growth in 2010.  For awhile, Beijing’s ability to keep its economic growth high was lauded around the world as a sign of its strong leadership and resilience.  Little did we know that China paid a huge price for a misguided and wasteful stimulus program.  The bulk of its stimulus package, roughly $1.5 trillion (with two-thirds in the form of loans from state-owned banks), was squandered on fixed-asset investments, such as infrastructure, factories, and commercial real estate.   As a result, many of these projects are not economically viable and will saddle the banking system with a mountain of non-performing loans.  The real estate bubble has maintained its froth.  The macroeconomic imbalance between investment and household consumption has barely improved.  Today, Chinese economic policy-makers are hamstrung in trying to revive economic growth.  The combination of local government indebtedness, massive bad loans hidden in the banking system, anemic external demand, and diminishing returns from investments has made it all but impossible for Beijing to use the same old economic playbook to fire up the economy.

Short-term difficulties are not the least of Beijing’s worries.  In the coming decade, many of the favorable structural factors that have helped power China’s double-digit growth in the past two decades are going to disappear.  Topping the list is the demographics.  The proportion of the Chinese population of working age peaked in 2011 and has started decreasing in 2012, according to a RAND study.  At the same time, the share of the elderly in the population is beginning to rise rapidly.  In 2010, 8.6 percent of the population was 65 and older.  By 2025, the figure will likely be 14.3 percent.  An aging population will increase labor costs, reduce savings and investments, inflate healthcare and pension costs — and slow down growth.

Another difficult obstacle ahead is environmental degradation.  Beijing has neglected environmental protection for the sake of rapid growth.  But the costs of environmental degradation have become unbearable, both economically and politically.  Water and air pollution today cause 750,000 premature deaths and around 8 percent of GDP.  China’s long-suffering population has finally begun to fight vigorously for their environmental rights.  This year alone, large-scale protests forced the government to cancel plans to build plants that would threaten the health and livelihoods of the residents in two Chinese cities.  In the decade ahead, the combination of environmental degradation and the effects of global warming will further drag down Chinese growth.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter
The Diplomat Brief