Safe and compact: these words, formulated in different ways, have become Tokyo’s mantra in its 2020 Olympics bid, which is heating up against rival contenders Istanbul and Madrid.
Most recently, this refrain was repeated last weekend in Lausanne, Switzerland, before a general meeting of the Association of National Olympic Committees by Tsunekazu Takeda, President of the Japanese Olympic Committee and the Tokyo 2020 Bid Committee, as well as Rie Tanaka, a Japanese gymnast who competed in last year’s London Olympics. They also emphasized the city’s clean streets, beautiful skyline and even its friendly taxi drivers. In late May, Tokyo’s Olympic crusaders also pitched the city’s virtues at the SportAccord conference in St. Petersburg, Russia.
If recent media reports are to be believed, “safe and compact” seems to be a winning combination when stacked up against the issues plaguing rivals Istanbul and Madrid. According to The Japan Times, high-level sources from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) who anonymously spoke to the paper have suggested that a win for Tokyo is nigh, assuming no gaffe that could botch the city’s chances between now and the IOC’s official announcement of the winner on September 7 in Buenos Aires. The no-gaffe proviso may seem simple enough, but when Japanese politicians and officialdom are involved, it is in fact a fairly big ask.Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.
Tokyo got off to a good start with its 2020 bid. “We have been hugely impressed by the quality of the bid presentations made by the bid committee. Across the board, they have just been excellent,” IOC vice president Craig Reedie said during the committee’s visit to the Japanese capital in March. So far, so good: or so it seemed. Fast forward from that first IOC visit to early May when Tokyo governor Naoki Inose made comments deemed offensive to the Arab world.
In an interview with The New York Times, he said: “So, from time to time, like Brazil, I think it’s good to have a venue for the first time. But Islamic countries, the only thing they share in common is Allah and they are fighting with each other, and they have classes.”
In response, Turkey’s youth and sports minister Suat Kilic tweeted: “The negative statements of the Chair of Tokyo 2020 are unfair and disheartening.”
In the days that followed things were touch and go for Tokyo. After Inose unequivocally apologized and president Takeda issued a statement further driving the extent of repentance home, a huge collective sigh of relief came when the IOC forgave Inose and assured Tokyo that the city would not be penalized for the comments.
The pendulum then swung dramatically back in Tokyo’s favor when riots broke out across Turkey after police cracked down on a campaign to save Gezi Park on May 31. Though many have speculated that the crackdown has dealt a “big blow” Istanbul’s chances, the city’s bid leaders were quick to claim that the riots would not diminish the city’s chances.
Uğur Erdener, President of the National Olympic Committee of Turkey, even went as far as saying, “In Istanbul, the voice of progress will be tempered by the voice of tolerance. And the bond of our secular democracy and its responsibility to govern will be strengthened. And Istanbul will be an even better host for 2020.”
Whether this proves true will not be known until September. But for the moment, Turkey’s unrest, combined with Madrid’s economic crisis (Spanish unemployment is 27 percent), seems to have tipped the scales back in Tokyo’s favor. It seems that the bid is Tokyo’s to lose. The biggest challenge now is to avoid making any other gaffes – about which Takeda has warned his colleagues on the Olympic Committee.
As momentum builds, Tokyoites have warmed to the idea of the games as well. Compared with the tepid public response to Tokyo’s 2016 bid, a stroll around Tokyo at the moment quickly reveals that the Olympic spirit is in the air. Signs emblazoned with “Tokyo 2020 Candidate City” are plastered on train station walls, while local news reports give a blow-by-blow account of the ongoing bid.
“Japan has its narrative that inspires many. That’s why we hope Tokyo will be chosen,” Abe said during a dinner hosted for the IOC in March. “It is about the disasters we endured, the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear failure. But it is also about the revitalization.”
Abe’s sentiment – invoking Japan’s phoenix-like nature – has rallied many to Tokyo’s cause. Yet, some remain unconvinced. “I don’t think it’s the right way to use money right now. The people in Tohoku are the ones who need it,” a Tokyo office worker named Akiko told The Diplomat. “The government should use that tax money for rebuilding the region.”
Another Tokyo resident took a different view, while also suggesting one tweak to the city’s plan. “I think it would great if Tokyo hosts the Olympics,” she said. “But it would be even better if more Japanese were involved in designing the event.” She was referring to the fact that UK architecture firm Zaha Hadid has been chosen to design a new 80,000-seat, $1.62 billion Olympic stadium if Tokyo wins the bid. “It would be better for Tokyo if a Japanese architect was chosen for the job.”
In the end, support outweighs opposition, with 77 percent of the public backing the city’s bid as of late March. And the city is ready with a government fund of $4.5 billion to make it happen. There are still a few more presentations to go, during which officials must carefully choose their words. But all in all, things look good for Tokyo.