The Pulse

India’s Development Aid to Afghanistan: Does Afghanistan Need What India Gives?

Recent Features

The Pulse

India’s Development Aid to Afghanistan: Does Afghanistan Need What India Gives?

Indian aid to Afghanistan is well-received, but how deeply has New Delhi analyzed its programs and their impact?

India’s Development Aid to Afghanistan: Does Afghanistan Need What India Gives?
Credit: Pixabay

Afghanistan has been a prime example of India’s aid and assistance programs. India’s contribution to Afghanistan’s civilian reconstruction efforts has been seen as one of the major factors leading to the famed goodwill for India among the Afghans. However, there has been a lack of critical and sober assessment of the tangible impact of Indian aid with respect to the priorities of security and development in Afghanistan. After more than 17 years of foreign security presence and multinational efforts to bring the war-torn country back to its feet and the evolving political space that requires talking to the Taliban while also fighting with them, Afghanistan is at crossroads. Amid such dynamic changes and continuities, the nature of India’s aid and assistance needs to undergo an assessment not only in terms of what India can offer but also in terms of what Afghanistan needs.

Since 2001, India’s development efforts in Afghanistan have been categorized in the following four categories: humanitarian assistance, major infrastructure projects, small and community-development projects and education and capacity development.

Humanitarian assistance has included the provision of high-protein biscuits to nearly 2 million children, supply of 2,50,000 metric tonnes of wheat, free medical consultation, and medicines to 30,000 Afghans monthly, provision of vehicles for local governance purposes, and the construction of five public toilet and bathhouse complexes in Kabul. In the infrastructure space, efforts have included the construction of the Zaranj-Delaram highway, the construction of the Pul-e-Khumri transmission line, construction of the Salma dam, restoration of the telecommunication infrastructure in 11 provinces, construction of the Afghan parliament and the expansion of the television network across the country. Small and community-development projects that focus on local ownership and management in the agriculture, education, rural development, health, vocational training, and solar energy have been initiated and are at different stages of development.

The efforts in the education and capacity development domain have included the reconstruction of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, reconstruction of the Habibia School, provision of 500 annual scholarships, provision of 500 training scholarships to Afghan public servants and deputation of 20 Indian public servants to provide training and mentorship, vocational support to Afghan women, and youth, and capacity building in media and information, civil aviation, agricultural research and education, health care and medicinal science, tourism, education, standardization, rural development, public administration, electoral management and administration, and local governance. In a September 2016 meeting between the leaders of the two states, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi pledged an additional $1 billion with greater impetus to the small development projects that are characterized by local community engagement and execution.

The nature and allocation of Indian development aid has generated goodwill in Afghanistan. This goodwill has led to greater allocation of aid in favor of well-received small development projects, indicating a degree of learning on the part of the Indian aid program to respond to Afghan input. Indian aid has also been acknowledged as the “most focused and effective” aid program in Afghanistan in terms of the value for aid generated.

A geographical mapping of India’s efforts leads to the inference that Indian efforts have been spread across all provinces in the country. But, a significant part of the efforts have been concentrated in and around Kabul, intended to strengthen the state and supporting its efforts at development in the proximate region. There has been a definite emphasis on state-building. Another reason for the geographical nature of these efforts is the association with the U.S. presence which has provided a security cover to India efforts.

However, has Indian aid been determined in tandem with Afghan requirements or has it been determined on the basis of what India can best offer? This question becomes more imperative to deliberate upon, given the changing context of the U.S. security presence. As U.S. interest (if not presence) dwindles, the space and capacity for India to continue with significant development outcomes could also be affected negatively.

There is very little literature to explain the mechanism through which India allocates aid. However, some writing indicates that especially in the case of small development projects, Indian engagement is limited to selection and technical oversight with greater onus on local community participation and execution. Further, Indian aid is said to be demand-driven although the question of who is making the demand remains open. There is some writing on “public impact” driving Indian aid allocation. However, here again the specifics of what public impact entails remains vague. India saw the establishment of the Development Administration Partnership (DPA) in 2012 as a body that was intended at “handling India’s aid projects through the stages of concept, launch, execution and completion.” However, the need for India to articulate its agenda in this regard remains.

In the context of Afghanistan’s limited aid absorption capacity, a subsequent question that emerges is if Indian aid to Afghanistan is designed around a long-term strategy and end goals. Further, in terms of outcomes of Indian aid, there are differing thoughts with regard to impact. While some think that Indian aid amounts to no significant influence in the political sphere, others believe in the effectiveness of Indian efforts in this regard. Amid these extreme arguments, a possible suggestion for Indian aid is to work toward a more “whole of system” impact that could address its intent of generating goodwill and improve the impact — for its interests and for Afghan interests as well. This would also aid the intended sustainability dimension of the aid allocation. Finally, Indian aid also requires an evaluative mechanism that could measure its tangible impact and empirically augment subsequent aid to Afghanistan and elsewhere.

Afghanistan has been one of India’s largest recipients of aid and the favorable reception to Indian aid is well-acknowledged by the Afghan public, government and international community. However, in light of the constantly shifting political, security and economic spaces, New Delhi’s approach to the country as a whole, including the intended objectives of its aid and assistance programs and their actual outcomes, need to be assessed. The perception among Afghans regarding India’s contribution to Afghan reconstruction efforts is a dynamic vector that needs to be understood and taken into consideration for a more need based and impactful aid and assistance program, which could be a significant force multiplier for India-Afghanistan strategic partnership.

Nandita Palrecha is an MA student of Conflict Resolution at the Department of Government, Georgetown University, Washington D.C.

Monish Tourangbam is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Geopolitics and International Relations, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India