Thailand foreign policy

Despite a consistent, albeit minuscule, economic relationship, Bangkok has little meaningful leverage over Pyongyang.

The past two administrations have pledged to play a more prominent role on the global stage. But words have yet to be met with actions.

In the discussions over Thailand's new cabinet, there has been a curious silence about foreign policy.

Thai commentators fear that fast-growing Vietnam could steal their nation's economic crown, but in most respects bilateral relations are in a better state than ever before.

Did Bangkok's refusal to sign the joint communique reflect inconsistency, or a more principled policy stance?

Bangkok says that membership would help boost the country's global economic and political profile.

Maris Sangiampongsa, a former ambassador to Australia, Fiji, and Nepal, will replace the outgoing foreign minister, who resigned unexpectedly over the weekend.

The unexpected resignation comes at a time when the Thai policy toward its troubled neighbor remains in flux.

The diplomatic push has not been matched by sufficient improvements in the country's own human rights record.

While relations between Bangkok and Beijing remain warm, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin is pursuing a more diversified foreign policy.

The country's traditional diplomatic finesse has been tested by domestic political upheaval and the rapidly shifting global strategic landscape.